A researcher studies water clarity at the same location in a lake on the same dates during the course of a year and repeats the measurements on the same dates 5 years later. The researcher immerses a weighted disk painted black and white and measures the depth (in inches) at which it is no longer visible. The collected data is given in the table below. Complete parts (a) through (c) below. Observation 3 Date 1/25 3/19 5/30 7/3 9/13 11/7 Initial Depth, X 63.3 40.2 49.4 45.1 46.4 68.2 Depth Five Years Later, Y 62.2 40.0 45.6 46.0 40.5 70.8 a) Why is it important to take the measurements on the same date? ow A. Using the same dates makes the second sample dependent on the first and reduces variability in water clarity attributable to date. B. Using the same dates maximizes the difference in water clarity. C. Using the same dates makes it easier to remember to take samples. D. Those are the same dates that all biologists use to take water clarity samples. b) Does the evidence suggest that the clarity of the lake is improving at the a = 0.05 level of significance? Note that the normal probability plot and boxplot of the data indicate that the differences are approximately normally distributed with no outliers. Let d = X,- Yj. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses. Но: Hy: ITune integers or decimals Do not round Click to select your answer(s). back 8. 5162 S55-7361 EG4S Low P. Mut arch or type URL +) & ( ) 8 delete { } | [ ] н K return ? 2. * 00 A researcher studies water clarity at the same location in a lake on the same dates during the course of a year and repeats the measurements on the same dates 5 years later. The researcher immerses a weighted disk painted black and white and measures the depth (in inches) at which it is no longer visible. The collected data is given in the table below. Complete parts (a) through (c) below. Observation 2 4 6. Date 1/25 3/19 5/30 7/3 9/13 11/7 Initial Depth, X 63.3 40.2 49.4 45.1 46.4 68.2 Depth Five Years Later, Y 62.2 40.0 45.6 46.0 40.5 70.8 Determine the test statistic for this hypothesis test. op Now (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Find the P-value for this hypothesis test. P-value = |(Round to three decimal places as needed.) What is your conclusion regarding Ho? I O A. Do not reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence at the a = 0.05 level of significance to conclude that the clarity of the lake is improving. B. Do not reject Ho. There is not sufficient evidence at the a = 0.05 level of significance to conclude that the clarity of the lake is improving. C. Reject Ho: There is sufficient evidence at the a = 0.05 level of significance to conclude that the clarity of the lake is improving. Click to select your answer(s). Feedback 5162 8. 355-7561 EG4S +, Q Search or type URL & ( ) 8 delete { } | Y [ ] н J K return く ? | shift P. 2. ト

Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction
4th Edition
ISBN:9781285463247
Author:David Poole
Publisher:David Poole
Chapter4: Eigenvalues And Eigenvectors
Section4.6: Applications And The Perron-frobenius Theorem
Problem 25EQ
icon
Related questions
Question
A researcher studies water clarity at the same location in a lake on the same dates during the course of a year and repeats the
measurements on the same dates 5 years later. The researcher immerses a weighted disk painted black and white and measures
the depth (in inches) at which it is no longer visible. The collected data is given in the table below. Complete parts (a) through (c)
below.
Observation
3
Date
1/25 3/19
5/30
7/3
9/13
11/7
Initial Depth, X
63.3
40.2
49.4
45.1
46.4
68.2
Depth Five Years Later, Y
62.2 40.0
45.6 46.0 40.5 70.8
a) Why is it important to take the measurements on the same date?
ow
A. Using the same dates makes the second sample dependent on the first and reduces variability in water clarity attributable
to date.
B. Using the same dates maximizes the difference in water clarity.
C. Using the same dates makes it easier to remember to take samples.
D. Those are the same dates that all biologists use to take water clarity samples.
b) Does the evidence suggest that the clarity of the lake is improving at the a = 0.05 level of significance? Note that the normal
probability plot and boxplot of the data indicate that the differences are approximately normally distributed with no outliers.
Let d = X,- Yj. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses.
Но:
Hy:
ITune integers or decimals Do not round
Click to select your answer(s).
back
8.
5162
S55-7361
EG4S
Low
P.
Mut
arch or type URL
+)
&
(
)
8
delete
{
}
|
[
]
н
K
return
?
2.
* 00
Transcribed Image Text:A researcher studies water clarity at the same location in a lake on the same dates during the course of a year and repeats the measurements on the same dates 5 years later. The researcher immerses a weighted disk painted black and white and measures the depth (in inches) at which it is no longer visible. The collected data is given in the table below. Complete parts (a) through (c) below. Observation 3 Date 1/25 3/19 5/30 7/3 9/13 11/7 Initial Depth, X 63.3 40.2 49.4 45.1 46.4 68.2 Depth Five Years Later, Y 62.2 40.0 45.6 46.0 40.5 70.8 a) Why is it important to take the measurements on the same date? ow A. Using the same dates makes the second sample dependent on the first and reduces variability in water clarity attributable to date. B. Using the same dates maximizes the difference in water clarity. C. Using the same dates makes it easier to remember to take samples. D. Those are the same dates that all biologists use to take water clarity samples. b) Does the evidence suggest that the clarity of the lake is improving at the a = 0.05 level of significance? Note that the normal probability plot and boxplot of the data indicate that the differences are approximately normally distributed with no outliers. Let d = X,- Yj. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses. Но: Hy: ITune integers or decimals Do not round Click to select your answer(s). back 8. 5162 S55-7361 EG4S Low P. Mut arch or type URL +) & ( ) 8 delete { } | [ ] н K return ? 2. * 00
A researcher studies water clarity at the same location in a lake on the same dates during the course of a year and repeats the
measurements on the same dates 5 years later. The researcher immerses a weighted disk painted black and white and measures
the depth (in inches) at which it is no longer visible. The collected data is given in the table below. Complete parts (a) through (c)
below.
Observation
2
4
6.
Date
1/25 3/19
5/30
7/3
9/13
11/7
Initial Depth, X
63.3 40.2 49.4 45.1
46.4 68.2
Depth Five Years Later, Y
62.2 40.0 45.6
46.0
40.5
70.8
Determine the test statistic for this hypothesis test.
op Now (Round to two decimal places as needed.)
Find the P-value for this hypothesis test.
P-value =
|(Round to three decimal places as needed.)
What is your conclusion regarding Ho?
I
O A. Do not reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence at the a = 0.05 level of significance to conclude that the clarity of the lake is
improving.
B. Do not reject Ho. There is not sufficient evidence at the a = 0.05 level of significance to conclude that the clarity of the lake
is improving.
C. Reject Ho: There is sufficient evidence at the a = 0.05 level of significance to conclude that the clarity of the lake is
improving.
Click to select your answer(s).
Feedback
5162
8.
355-7561
EG4S
+,
Q Search or type URL
&
(
)
8
delete
{
}
|
Y
[
]
н
J
K
return
く
?
|
shift
P.
2.
ト
Transcribed Image Text:A researcher studies water clarity at the same location in a lake on the same dates during the course of a year and repeats the measurements on the same dates 5 years later. The researcher immerses a weighted disk painted black and white and measures the depth (in inches) at which it is no longer visible. The collected data is given in the table below. Complete parts (a) through (c) below. Observation 2 4 6. Date 1/25 3/19 5/30 7/3 9/13 11/7 Initial Depth, X 63.3 40.2 49.4 45.1 46.4 68.2 Depth Five Years Later, Y 62.2 40.0 45.6 46.0 40.5 70.8 Determine the test statistic for this hypothesis test. op Now (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Find the P-value for this hypothesis test. P-value = |(Round to three decimal places as needed.) What is your conclusion regarding Ho? I O A. Do not reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence at the a = 0.05 level of significance to conclude that the clarity of the lake is improving. B. Do not reject Ho. There is not sufficient evidence at the a = 0.05 level of significance to conclude that the clarity of the lake is improving. C. Reject Ho: There is sufficient evidence at the a = 0.05 level of significance to conclude that the clarity of the lake is improving. Click to select your answer(s). Feedback 5162 8. 355-7561 EG4S +, Q Search or type URL & ( ) 8 delete { } | Y [ ] н J K return く ? | shift P. 2. ト
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 5 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction
Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285463247
Author:
David Poole
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781680331141
Author:
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Publisher:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL