Amaranda and Bartolo consume only two goods, X and Y. They can trade only with each other and there is no production. The total endowment of good X equals the total endowment of good Y. Amaranda's utility function is U(xA, YA) = min{Xa, YA} and Bartolo's utility function is U(XB, YB) = max{Xg, yB}. In an Edgeworth box for Amaranda and Bartolo, the set of Pareto optimal allocations is the main diagonal. both diagonals. the whole Edgeworth box. the edges of the box and the main diagonal. the edges of the box.

Amaranda and Bartolo consume only two goods, X and Y. They can trade only with each other and there is no production. The total endowment of good X equals the total endowment of good Y. Amaranda's utility function is U(xA, YA) = min{Xa, YA} and Bartolo's utility function is U(XB, YB) = max{Xg, yB}. In an Edgeworth box for Amaranda and Bartolo, the set of Pareto optimal allocations is the main diagonal. both diagonals. the whole Edgeworth box. the edges of the box and the main diagonal. the edges of the box.

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter13: General Equilibrium And Welfare

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 13.5P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Bluth’s preferences for paper and houses can be expressed as Ub(p, h) = 2pb + hb, while Scott’s preferences can be expressed as Us(p, h) = ps + 2bs. Bluth begins with no paper and 10 houses, whereas Scott begins with 10 units of paper and no houses. 1. Is the starting endowment Pareto efficient? Justify your answer using an Edgeworth box? Determine whether each of the following price pairs is consistent with a competitive equilibrium. If yes, determine the resulting allocation of goods, sketching that equi- librium in your Edgeworth box. If not, explain why not (for what good is there a shortage, for what good is there a surplus?) pp =$3 and ph =$1 along with pp =$1 and ph =$1 Assume that the price of houses is $1. Given that price, determine the highest price pp that is consistent with a competitive equilibrium.
Chris and Dana live in an exchange economy with two goods: good Q and good R. Chris starts off with an endowment of 6 units of Q and 10 units of R. Dana starts off with an endowment of 8 units of Q and 8 units of R. Suppose that the price of good R is pR=1 and the price of good Q is pQ=2. a )At these prices, does the market clear? Yes or no? Explain your answer. b) What relationship must hold between the consumption of each agent and the price of the two goods at the market clearing equilibrium? Write the equation
####### Consider the following pure exchange, Edgeworth box economy. There are 2 consumers and 2 goods. Consumer 1 has an endowment of 3 units of good Y, while consumer 2 has an endowment of 3 units of good X. For both consumers the utility function is given by: U (x, v) = x^2y, where x and y denote the respective quantities of goods X and Y. Find the Walrasian equilibrium price ratio P/Pr and the Walrasian allocations. Does trade take place in equilibrium? i want answer in 1 hour. if you provide solution within time, i will upvote. thanks in advance
Let there be 3 people in the economy. Let the utility function of person 1 be u=min(x,y), utility of person 2 be = max(x,y) and the utility function of the 3rd consumer be U=x+y. Let the endowment points be A(5,5), B(5,5) c(5,5). An example of a pareto efficient allocation is: A) A(5,5), B(5,5) c(5,5) B) A(5,5), B(5,0) c(10,5) C) A(5,5), B(0,5), c(5,10) D) None of the above The correct answer is D. Explain clearly. Also, please state the pareto effient outcome not mentioned in the options (if it exists).
Rahim and Karim are two brothers. Rahim got 4 ice creams and 6 chocolates and Karim received 6 ice creams and 4 chocolates from heaven (the economy is assumed with no production and the amounts of goods they received as the initial endowments). The two brothers have the same Cobb-Doughlas preference structure. Draw the Edgeworth box and level the initial endowments. What is Pareto improvement? Does Pareto improvement possible here? If yes, show the Pareto improvement area in the Edgeworth box.
Two individuals, Fred and Helen, are in an economy with no production, and each have the utility function U = 10XY. Prices of both X and Y are set at $1. Initial endowments for Fred are 10 units of X and 6 units of Y. Helen has 8 units of X and 12 units of Y. Find the general equilibrium prices and allocation, then show that the G.E. allocation is Pareto efficient.
Consider a pure exchange economy, where each consumer has preferences described by a Cobb-Douglas utility function. Both consumers have exactly the same endowment. In such an economy, an equitable distribution of goods (where each individual consumes exactly half of each good) is a Walrasian equilibrium allocation? a. always, for any consumers' preferences b. only if consumers' preferences are exactly the same c. Never d. None of the above
For the rest of this question consider a two goods economy where Kim and Jung can trade Ferraris (good x) and VR headsets (good y) with each other. Kim and Jung both enjoy driving Ferraris and having more VR headsets (so more friends can play the same game). They start at the same (high) level of income. Kim has an initial endowment of (x0k, y0k) = (10,30) and Jung has an initial endowment of (x0j, y0j) = (30,10) d) Assume that a social planner could redistribute initial wealth (the amounts of ? and ? that Kim and Jung have). Can they reallocate resources so that Kim and Jung reach the allocation (Xk, Yk) = (20,20) and (Xj, Yj) = (20,20) as a general equilibrium (i.e. post-trade) allocation? Can the social planner redistribute resources to make the allocation where Jung owns all the resources in the economy a general equilibrium allocation?
Problem 5 Consider an exchange economy with two people: Will and Bob; and two goods: apples and bananas. Will's initial endowment is 10 apples and 5 bananas. Bob's initial endowment is 5 apples and 10 bananas. Will likes apples and hates bananas. Bob likes both apples and bananas. The preferences of both Will and Bob are strictly convex. (a) Draw an Edgeworth Box with apples on the horizontal axes. Put Will at the bottom left corner and Bob at the top right corner. Show the initial endowment and label it with W.
For the rest of this question consider a two goods economy where Kim and Jung can trade Ferraris (good x) and VR headsets (good y) with each other. Kim and Jung both enjoy driving Ferraris and having more VR headsets (so more friends can play the same game). They start at the same (high) level of income. Kim has an initial endowment of (x0k, y0k) = (10,30) and Jung has an initial endowment of (x0j, y0j) = (30,10) c) Assume that Kim has preferences Uk (Xk, Yk) = 3Xk + 3Yk and Jung has preferences Uj (Xj, Yj) = Xj + 3Yj. Will Kim and Jung trade? Calculate the general equilibrium allocation for Kim and Jung. Compute the utility at the endowment point and at the general equilibrium allocation. Is the new allocation on the contract curve?
Suppose that all goods are made with two factors-labour and capital. The table below shows the total endowments of each factor in the United States and Canada.Based on the information in the table, which of the following statements is FALSE? A) Canada is relatively capital abundant.B) The US is relatively labour abundant.C) The US has more capital and labour than Canada.D) The US is relatively capital abundant.
If John can produce a good in less time than Fred then he has an absolute advantage in producing that good. Group of answer choices True False