Consider an employee who does not receive employer-based health insurance and must divide her $1,000 per week in after-tax income between health insurance and “other goods.” Draw this worker’s opportunity set if the price of health insurance is $200 per week and the price of “other goods” is $100 per week. On the same graph, illustrate how the opportunity set would change if the employer agreed to give this employee $200 worth of health insurance per week (under current tax laws, this form of compensation is nontaxable). Would this employee be better or worse off if, instead of the health insurance, the employer gave her a $200 per week raise that was taxable at a rate of 25 percent? Explain

Consider an employee who does not receive employer-based health insurance and must divide her $1,000 per week in after-tax income between health insurance and “other goods.” Draw this worker’s opportunity set if the price of health insurance is $200 per week and the price of “other goods” is $100 per week. On the same graph, illustrate how the opportunity set would change if the employer agreed to give this employee $200 worth of health insurance per week (under current tax laws, this form of compensation is nontaxable). Would this employee be better or worse off if, instead of the health insurance, the employer gave her a $200 per week raise that was taxable at a rate of 25 percent? Explain

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter6: Demand Relationships Among Goods

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6.13P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider an employee who does not receive employer-based health insurance and must divide her $10,000 per week in after-tax income between health insurance and "other goods." Draw this worker's opportunity set if the price of health insurance is $2,000 per week and the price of "other goods" is $1,000 per week. On the same graph, illustrate how the opportunity set would change if the employer agreed to give this employee $2,000 worth of health insurance per week (under current tax laws, this form of compensation is nontaxable). Would this employee be better or worse off if, instead of the health insurance, the employer gave her a $2,000 per week raise that was taxable at a rate of 25 percent? Explain.
Consider an economy composed of 16 consumers. Of these, 5 consumers each own one right shoe and 11 consumers each own one left shoe. Shoes are indivisible. Everyone has the same utility function, which is Min(2R, L}, where R and L are, respectively, the quantities of right and left shoes con sumed. A) (10%) Is the status quo (where each individual has his own shoe) Pareto efficient? If so, briefly explain why. If not, provide a Pareto improvement b) (10%) Characterize all Pareto efficient allocations
Suppose a person can work up to 80 hours per week at a pre-tax wage of $20 per hour but faces a constant 20% payroll tax. Assume that under these conditions the person maximizes utility by choosing to work 50 hours each week. The government proposes a negative income tax so that everyone receives $300 per week regardless of how much they work. To pay for the negative income tax, the payroll tax would be increased to 50%. Using the labor-leisure model, graphically show whether a person would be better off if the negative income tax is adopted and indicate whether hours worked increases or decreases due to the policy.
Suppose that there are three beachfront parcels of land available for sale in Astoria, and six people who would each like to purchase one parcel. Assume that the parcels are essentially identical and that the selling price of each is $745,000. The following table states each person's willingness and ability to purchase a parcel. Willingness and Ability to Purchase (Dollars) Alyssa 720,000 Brian 690,000 Crystal 680,000 Nick 900,000 Rosa 810,000 Tim 770,000 Which of these people will buy one of the three beachfront parcels? Check all that apply. Alyssa Brian Crystal Nick Rosa Tim Assume that the three beachfront parcels are sold to the people you indicated in the previous section. Suppose that a few days after the last of those beachfront parcels is sold, another essentially identical beachfront parcel becomes available for sale at a price of $732,500. This fourth parcel _____________be sold…
Mark can work up to 80 hours each week at a pre-tax hourly wage of $20 but faces a constant 20 percent tax on his earnings. Thus, Mark maximizes his utility by choosing to work 50 hours per week. The government proposes a negative income tax whereby everyone is given $300 per week and anyone can supplement their income further by working. To pay for the negative income tax, tax on earnings will be increased to 50 percent. On a single graph, draw Mark's original budget line and his budget line under the negative income tax. Show that Mark will work fewer hours if the negative income tax is implemented Will Mark's utility be greater under the negative income tax? Discuss your answer.
Moe and Curly both face the same budget line for consumption and leisure. At every possible consumption-leisure bundle on the budget line, Curly always requires marginally more leisure than does Moe in order to be equally happy when asked to forego a dollar of consumption. Using a standard budget line, graph the indifference curves for Moe and Curly that shows the optimal consumption-leisure bundle for both people. Which person optimally chooses more consumption? Which feature of indifference curves guarantees this result?
The graph below shows David’s preferences for leisure and consumption. Draw three budget constraints in the graph below. One if David’s wage is $10 per hour (BC1), another if his wage is $20 per hour (BC2) and a third for if his wage is $30 per hour (BC3). Show the optimal combination of leisure and consumption for each of the three budget constraints. Label the optimal amount of Leisure, L1, L2 & L3, and label the optimal amounts of consumption C1, C2 & C3.
Caroline and Alana are 2 sisters who live in a village called Deadend where no work is available. To go to the nearest city where jobs are available, they need to buy a bus pass for $50 dollars a week. Both receive an allowance of Yn from their parents. Illustrate in two different graphs Caroline and Alana’s s situations in the following two cases: Caroline’s preferences are such that she optimally decides to stay home receiving her parents’ allowance of Yn given the wage rate available in the nearest city and the cost of the bus pass. Alana’s preferences are such that she optimally chooses to commute and work h* given the wage rate and the cost of the bus pass and Yn. PLEASE JUST DRAW GRAPH NO EXPLANATION NEEDED
Terry attends college and works part-time in a drug store. She can work up to 40 hours per week and is paid $9 per hour. With her schoolwork and other responsibilities, she only has 40 hours per week total to devote to work and leisure. The following table shows her utility from different levels of leisure and income. Hours of Leisure Total Utility from Leisure Marginal Utility of Leisure Work Hours Income Total Utility from Income Marginal Utility from Income 5 18 5 45 35 10 34 10 90 59 15 48 15 135 77 20 56 20 180 86 25 60 25 225 92 30 65 30 270 98 35 69 35 315 103 40 72 40 360 107 Terry decides to decrease her work hours from 20 to 10. 8. What would be marginal utility loss from less income?
In the past, Andy received a university scholarship of Rp2,000,000 per month to purchase textbooks (B) and daily needs (L). At that time, Andy maximized his utility by spending Rp500,000 for textbooks and Rp 1,500,000 for daily needs, Now graphically show the allocation of the scholarship that maximized Andy's utility (B on the horizontal axis and L on the vertical axis) and interpret it!
Suppose you wants to go in for Swimming and GYM sessions during your holiday this Summer. The price of Swimming is $50 per session, and price for GYM is for $30 per session. Suppose you have $3000 available to spend on these two activities during your holiday this Summer. How will the consumer’s opportunity set (budget line) changes when price of Swimming decreases to $40? Show your answer on your graph in part b above (use colored ink). How does decrease (to from $50 to $40) affects Market rate of substitution?
Efficiency requires that no more trades can be made between people, or equivalently, that their marginal rates of substitution (MRS) be equal for all goods they consume. Yet you and I never trade anything between each other, so how and when can we be sure we have equal MRS's?