Do the data that Mendel obtained fit his hypotheses?For example, Mendel obtained 315 yellow round, 101yellow wrinkled, 108 green round, and 32 greenwrinkled seeds from the selfing of Yy Rr individuals(a total of 556). His hypotheses of segregation andindependent assortment predict a 9:3:3:1 ratio in thiscase. Use the chi-square test to determine whetherMendel’s data are significantly different from whathe predicted. (The chi-square test did not exist inMendel’s day, so he was not able to test his own datafor goodness of fit to his hypotheses.)

Do the data that Mendel obtained fit his hypotheses?For example, Mendel obtained 315 yellow round, 101yellow wrinkled, 108 green round, and 32 greenwrinkled seeds from the selfing of Yy Rr individuals(a total of 556). His hypotheses of segregation andindependent assortment predict a 9:3:3:1 ratio in thiscase. Use the chi-square test to determine whetherMendel’s data are significantly different from whathe predicted. (The chi-square test did not exist inMendel’s day, so he was not able to test his own datafor goodness of fit to his hypotheses.)

Human Heredity: Principles and Issues (MindTap Course List)

11th Edition

ISBN:9781305251052

Author:Michael Cummings

Publisher:Michael Cummings

Chapter5: The Inheritance Of Complex Traits

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2QP: The text outlines some of the problems Frederick William I encountered in his attempt to breed tall...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A pedigree analysis was performed on the family of a man with schizophrenia. Based on the known concordance statistics, would his MZ twin be at high risk for the disease? Would the twins risk decrease if he were raised in an environment different from that of his schizophrenic brother?
Mendel knew that some traits could be closely associated. Mendel said that those traits were essentially the same trait. Could Mendel be including traits that were very closely linked or that were due to the same genetic factor? Did he need to distinguish between these two possibilities in order to reject them as evidence for his Law of Independent Assortment? Why or why not?
Gregor Mendel knew that some traits could be closely associated. Mendel said that those traits were essentially the same trait. Mendel could be including traits that were very closely linked or that were due to the same genetic factor. Did he need to distinguish between these two possibilities in order to reject them as evidence for his Law of Independent Assortment? Why or why not?
In Mendel’s 1866 publication as shown in Figure 1-4, he reports 705 purple-flowered (violet) offspring and 224 white-flowered offspring. The ratio he obtained is 3.15:1 for purple: white. How do you think he explained the fact that the ratio is not exactly 3:1?
Which of the following is evidence that Mendel had that helped him to construct his Law of Segregation?A) His F2 generation in the dihybrid cross resulted in a 1:1:1:1 distribution of phenotypes.B) He found no linkage of different genes in the offspring of his pea plants.C) The F1 generation of the monohybrid cross resulted in blended phenotypes.D) The F2 generation of the monohybrid cross resulted in the recessive trait reappearing as a phhenotype.E) Two of the above are correct.
Mendel describes subjecting each of the 34 varieties of peas he obtained to a two-year trial. During this time he let the plants self-fertilize and observed their offspring. What was he looking for, and what was the purpose of doing this two-year trial? Explain what Mendel means when he writes that the 3:1 ratio observed in the first generation from the hybrids "resolves itself" into a ratio of 2:1:1
In Mendel's experiments, he obtained the following results: Which phenotypes can be said to be dominant?
As you know Mendel’s main contribution to genetics was his proposing a model of particulate inheritance. This discovery contradicted the widely held belief that blending inheritance was the true theory that explained hereditary traits. One advantage that Mendel had in choosing garden peas (Pisum sativum) was that he could either allow the pea flowers on a plant to self-pollinate or he could deliberately cross-pollinate the flowers. For his single locus crosses of pure-breeding lines, he would take the F2 offspring of the dominant phenotype (such as yellow seeds) and ensure that each yellow-seeded plant would self-pollinate. He was able to show that 1/3 of all the yellow-seeded plants in this generation bred true while the other 2/3 of the yellow seeded plants showed segregation. Do you believe that this extra experiment gave additional important evidence for the particulate theory of inheritance or did the offspring from the F1 x F1 cross provide enough evidence of Mendel’s First Law?…
What could be the genotypic and phenotypic ratios for a typical mendelian trait showed in the picture?
If the chi-square value came out to 14,224.221 and the p-value was said to be less than 0.01, what do you conclude about whether these traits follow a simple Mendelian inheritance pattern? Explain your answer.
shown are the F2 results of two Mendel's monohybrid crosses. Mendel crossed 2 heterozygote parents. If he were to expect segregation to happen normally, do the results match his expectations? state a null hypothesis that you will test using chi-square analysis. Calculate the chi-square value and determine the p value for both crosses a. Full pods: 882; constricted pods: 299 (full pods are dominant over constricted) b. violet flowers: 705; white flowers: 500 (violet dominant over white)
When Gregor Mendel performed his breeding experiments on pea plants, he discovered that tallness in the plants is inherited through a simple dominant trait (coded "T") with shortness as the recessive trait (coded "t"). Imagine that Mendel bred a homozygous dominant pea plant with a pea plant heterozygous for tallness. Draw a Punnett Square to help you answer this question and the next one: In the 1st generation of offspring, we expect the genotypes (for tallness) to include… a) 50% homozygous dominant, 50% heterozygous b) 100% heterozygous c) 50% tall, 50% short d) 100% tall e) None of the above