$10000, faces a1. Calculate the expected utility of a person who has wealth Wpotential loss of C $5000 with probability π and has a utility index u(x) overmoney:=(i) π = 0.01 and u(x) = x²;(ii) π = 0.01 and u(x) = √√√√x;(iii) π = = 0.1 and u(x) = −2-x/10000.(iv) π = : 0.1 and u(x) = ln(x) with the natural base(v) π = = 0.1 and u(x) = log₁0 (x) with the base 10=

$10000, faces a 1. Calculate the expected utility of a person who has wealth W potential loss of C $5000 with probability and has a utility index u(x) over money: = (i) π = 0.01 and u(x) = x²; (ii) π = 0.01 and u(x): = √x; (iii) π = 0.1 and u(x) = -2-x/10000. (iv) π = 0.1 and u(x) = ln(x) with the natural base (v) π = 0.1 and u(x) = log₁0 (x) with the base 10 =

$10000, faces a 1. Calculate the expected utility of a person who has wealth W potential loss of C $5000 with probability and has a utility index u(x) over money: = (i) π = 0.01 and u(x) = x²; (ii) π = 0.01 and u(x): = √x; (iii) π = 0.1 and u(x) = -2-x/10000. (iv) π = 0.1 and u(x) = ln(x) with the natural base (v) π = 0.1 and u(x) = log₁0 (x) with the base 10 =

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter16: Labor Markets

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 16.9P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Find the Pratt - Arrow risk - aversion function for a utility function U(W) = log(0.5-W + 500), where W is the amount of wealth in €. Suppose that an investor's wealth is subject to outcomes -800 €, 500 €, 500 € and 1, 000 € which affect the initial amount of 2,500 € with probabilities of their occurrence 40%, 15%, 15% and 30%, respectively. a) Using the Taylor approximation to certainty equivalent, calculate an approximate expected utility value. b) Calculate the certain equivalent of the investor's uncertain wealth. Interpret.
Consider an individual who maximizes his expected utility with the following utility function: U(x) = logX He is faced with the lottery with the following probabilities and payoffs Probability Money 0.4 30 0.5 100 0.1 50 a. Find his expected utility b. Calculate the Certainty Equivalent c. Find the amount that the individual will be willing to pay in order to avoid the lottery (That is, the risk premium)
Calculate the risk premium of John when he faces the risky prospect X = {1, 4, 9, 16; 0.2, 0.4, 0.4, 0.0} . His utility function is u ( x ) = x , where x is wealth. (Use two decimals)
For constants a and b, 0 < b, b 1, and expected profit E(p), the expected utility function of a person who is risk-neutral can be written as E(U) = Which one: a+b^p a + (E(p))^b. a - bE(p). a + bE(p). a + (E(p))^(-b).
Calculate the expected utility of John when he faces the risky prospect X = {4, 9, 16, 25; 0.2, 0.3, 0.3, 0.2} . His utility function isu ( x ) = 50 x − x 2 , where x is wealth. (Use two decimals) ________
You are a risk-averse investor with a CRRA utility function. You are faced with the decision to invest your total wealth W of £1,000,000 into a riskless asset which generates a return of 5% or into a risky asset which either generates a return of 20% or a loss of −4% with equal probability. Find the optimal investment allocation with a coefficient of relative risk aversion η=2, and comment on your results.
QUESTION 16 Selwyn has a utility function of the form uW=(W^(1-x))/(1-x), where x=0.7. Calculate Selwyn's coefficient of relative risk aversion when his wealth is equal to £100.
Suppose Investor A has a power utility function with γ = 1, whilst Investor B has a power utility function with γ = 0.5 (i) Which investor is more risk-averse(assuming that w > 0)? (ii) Suppose that Investor B has an initial wealth of 100 and is offered the opportunity to buy Investment X for 100, which offers an equal chance of a payout of 110 or 92. Will she choose to buy Investment X?
If a risk‐neutral individual owns a home worth $200,000 and there is a three percent chance the home will be destroyed by fire in the next year, then we know that:a) He is willing to pay much more than $6,000 for full cover.b) He is willing to pay much less than $6,000 for full cover.c) He is willing to pay at most $6,000 for full cover.d) None of the above are correct.e) All of the above are correct.
Sarah has a coefficient of risk aversion of 2. Sheng has a coefficient of risk aversion of 4. Given their risk preferences, we do not expect that... Select one: a. The indifference curves of Sheng are steeper than those of Sarah. b. Sheng holds a higher weight of the risky assets than Sarah does. c. None of the options provided. d. Sarah and Sheng hold the same risky assets in their portfolios.
The von-Neumann Morgenstern utility function is of the form u(e) - In(e). There is a lottery over consumption outcomes: with probability 0.3, the consumption will be 1 and with probability 0.7 the consumption will be 3; Compute the risk premium (round to 2 decimals).
Gary likes to gamble. Donna offers to bet him $31 on the outcome of a boat race. If Gary’s boat wins, Donna would give him $31. If Gary’s boat does not win, Gary would give her $31. Gary’s utility function is p1x^21+p2x^22, where p1 and p2 are the probabilities of events 1 and 2 and where x1 and x2 are his wealth if events 1 and 2 occur respectively. Gary’s total wealth is currently only $80 and he believes that the probability that he will win the race is 0.3. Which of the following is correct? (please submit the number corresponding to the correct answer). Taking the bet would reduce his expected utility. Taking the bet would leave his expected utility unchanged. Taking the bet would increase his expected utility. There is not enough information to determine whether taking the bet would increase or decrease his expected utility. The information given in the problem is self-contradictory.