estimated annual retum () which constrairts are binding? what is your interpretation of these constraints in terms of the problem? (Select all that apply) C Constraint 1. Al funds available are being utized. O Constraint 2 The maximum permissibie rkis being incured. O Constraint 3. All evalable shares of US. O are being purchased. ONone of the constraints are binding (a what are the dual values for the constraints? Interpret each. (Round your anwers te twe decimal places) constraint 1 Constraint 1 has a dual value of 0.09. r an adonal dollar isadded te the available funds, the total annual retum is predicted to inorease by sa.0n. O Constraint 1 has a dual value ofS.an additional dallar s added te the avalable funda, the total annual return is prodicted to increase by $5. CConstraint 1 has a dual value of 3. If an addtional dollar is added to the alatle fund. the total ann return is predicted to increese by $3. OConstreint I has a dual value of 1.33. an adstional dar is added to the avalable funds, the total anual retun a predicted to increase by $1.33. OConatraint 1 has a slack of s200. Addtional dolars added to the avaliabie fund wl net ingrove the tetal annual retum constraint 2

Practical Management Science
6th Edition
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Chapter4: Linear Programming Models
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 82P
icon
Related questions
Question
(a) What is the optimal solution, and what is the value of the total annual return (in $)?
estimated annual returm
(b) Which constraints are binding? What is your interpretation of these constraints in terms of the problem? (Select all that apply.)
O Constraint 1. All funds available are being utized.
O Constraint 2. The maximum permissible risk is being incurred.
O Constraint 3. All available shares of U.S. Ol are being purchased.
O None of the constraints are binding.
(e) What are the dual values for the constraints? Interpret each. (Round your answers to two decimal places. )
constraint 1
O Constraint 1 has a dual volue of 0.09. It an adational dollar is added to the avallable funds, the botal annual retum is predicted to increase by $0.09.
O Constraint 1 has a dual value of 5. If an additional dollar is added to the avalable funda, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $5.
O Constraint 1 has a dual value of 3. If an additional dolar is added to the avalatle funds, the total annl return is predicted to increase by $3.
O Constraint 1 has a duel value of 1.33. an additional dellar is added to the aveilable funds, the total annual retun a predicted to increase by 1.33.
O Constraint 1 has a slack of s200. Additional dollars added to the avalable funds will not improve the tetal annual return.
constraint 2
O Constraint 2 has a dual value of 0.09. It the risk index is increesed by 1, the tutal annual return is predicted to increase by s0.00.
Constreint 2 has a dusl velue of S. If the risk index is increased by 1, the total annual retum is predicted to increase by $5.
O Canstraint 2 has a dual value of 3. If the risk index is increased by 1. the total annual retum is predicted to increase by 53.
O Constraint 2 has a duel value of 1.33. the risk index la increased by 1, the total annual retum is predicted te increase by $1.33.
Coratraint 2 hes a slack of 200. Alowing additional risk wil not improve the total annual retum.
constraint 3
Constraint 3 has a dual value of 0.09. the maximum number of shares of U.S. O is increased by 1. the total annual return is predicted to increase by s0.09.
Constraint 3 has a dual value of 5. the maximum number of shares of u.S. Ol is increased by 1, the tetal annual return is predictod te increase by 5.
O Constraint 3 has a dual velue of 3. If the maimum number ef shares of US. Ol s increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted te increase by $3.
O Conatraint 3 has a dual value of 133. If the maximum number of shares of US. Ol is increased by 1, the total annual return ie predicted to increasey 1.33.
Constraint 3 has a slack of 200 shares. Raising the masimum number cf shares of US. Ol will net improve the total annual retum
(4) Would t be beneficial to increese the maxium amount invested in U.S O7 Why or why not?
Yos, each adtmonal chare increases the proft by $1.33
Yes, each addtional share inreases the profn by 200.00.
Transcribed Image Text:(a) What is the optimal solution, and what is the value of the total annual return (in $)? estimated annual returm (b) Which constraints are binding? What is your interpretation of these constraints in terms of the problem? (Select all that apply.) O Constraint 1. All funds available are being utized. O Constraint 2. The maximum permissible risk is being incurred. O Constraint 3. All available shares of U.S. Ol are being purchased. O None of the constraints are binding. (e) What are the dual values for the constraints? Interpret each. (Round your answers to two decimal places. ) constraint 1 O Constraint 1 has a dual volue of 0.09. It an adational dollar is added to the avallable funds, the botal annual retum is predicted to increase by $0.09. O Constraint 1 has a dual value of 5. If an additional dollar is added to the avalable funda, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $5. O Constraint 1 has a dual value of 3. If an additional dolar is added to the avalatle funds, the total annl return is predicted to increase by $3. O Constraint 1 has a duel value of 1.33. an additional dellar is added to the aveilable funds, the total annual retun a predicted to increase by 1.33. O Constraint 1 has a slack of s200. Additional dollars added to the avalable funds will not improve the tetal annual return. constraint 2 O Constraint 2 has a dual value of 0.09. It the risk index is increesed by 1, the tutal annual return is predicted to increase by s0.00. Constreint 2 has a dusl velue of S. If the risk index is increased by 1, the total annual retum is predicted to increase by $5. O Canstraint 2 has a dual value of 3. If the risk index is increased by 1. the total annual retum is predicted to increase by 53. O Constraint 2 has a duel value of 1.33. the risk index la increased by 1, the total annual retum is predicted te increase by $1.33. Coratraint 2 hes a slack of 200. Alowing additional risk wil not improve the total annual retum. constraint 3 Constraint 3 has a dual value of 0.09. the maximum number of shares of U.S. O is increased by 1. the total annual return is predicted to increase by s0.09. Constraint 3 has a dual value of 5. the maximum number of shares of u.S. Ol is increased by 1, the tetal annual return is predictod te increase by 5. O Constraint 3 has a dual velue of 3. If the maimum number ef shares of US. Ol s increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted te increase by $3. O Conatraint 3 has a dual value of 133. If the maximum number of shares of US. Ol is increased by 1, the total annual return ie predicted to increasey 1.33. Constraint 3 has a slack of 200 shares. Raising the masimum number cf shares of US. Ol will net improve the total annual retum (4) Would t be beneficial to increese the maxium amount invested in U.S O7 Why or why not? Yos, each adtmonal chare increases the proft by $1.33 Yes, each addtional share inreases the profn by 200.00.
Investment Advisors, Inc., is a brokerage firm that manages stock portfolos for a number of dients. A particular portfollo consists of U shares of U.S. Ol and H shares of Huber Steel. The annual
Invested. The portfolio risk index (0.50 per share of U.S. Oil and 0.25 per share for Huber Steel) has a maximum of 700. In addition, the portfolio is limited to a maxcimum of 1,000 shares of U.S. Ol.
The linear programming formulation that will maximize the total annual return of the portfolo is as follows.
Max 30 + SH
Maximize total annual return
s.t.
250 + SOH S 80,000 Funds available
0.50U + 0.25H S
700 Risk maximum
S 1,000 U.S. Ol maximum
U, H20
The computer output is shown below.
Optimal objective Value - 00.0c000s
Variable
Value
Beduces Cent
0.00000
0.01000
00.00000
1200.00000
Constraint
Slack/barpius
Dual Velue
0.00oto
0.000
23.ב
200.c0030
0.00000
Cjeotive
Coeftielent
Allowable
Inerease
7.00000
ALjowale
Decrease
Varieble
3.00000
.5000
5.0000
3.5000
RAS
Value
Allewable
Iscrease
ALlewable
Constraint
Decrease
so0.co
75. coon0
301.c000
1000.0000
Intinite
201.coo00
(a) what in the eptimal selution, and what is the value of the total annual retum in $)7
estimated annuel retum
Transcribed Image Text:Investment Advisors, Inc., is a brokerage firm that manages stock portfolos for a number of dients. A particular portfollo consists of U shares of U.S. Ol and H shares of Huber Steel. The annual Invested. The portfolio risk index (0.50 per share of U.S. Oil and 0.25 per share for Huber Steel) has a maximum of 700. In addition, the portfolio is limited to a maxcimum of 1,000 shares of U.S. Ol. The linear programming formulation that will maximize the total annual return of the portfolo is as follows. Max 30 + SH Maximize total annual return s.t. 250 + SOH S 80,000 Funds available 0.50U + 0.25H S 700 Risk maximum S 1,000 U.S. Ol maximum U, H20 The computer output is shown below. Optimal objective Value - 00.0c000s Variable Value Beduces Cent 0.00000 0.01000 00.00000 1200.00000 Constraint Slack/barpius Dual Velue 0.00oto 0.000 23.ב 200.c0030 0.00000 Cjeotive Coeftielent Allowable Inerease 7.00000 ALjowale Decrease Varieble 3.00000 .5000 5.0000 3.5000 RAS Value Allewable Iscrease ALlewable Constraint Decrease so0.co 75. coon0 301.c000 1000.0000 Intinite 201.coo00 (a) what in the eptimal selution, and what is the value of the total annual retum in $)7 estimated annuel retum
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Practical Management Science
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781337406659
Author:
WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:
Cengage,