Growth in real GDP per capita Initial level of real GDP per capita Refer to Figure 11-5. Based on the "catch-up line" drawn above, poorer countries are more likely to be at a point like GDP is relatively O A; low; B; high A; high; B; low B; low; A; high B; high; A; low where growth in while richer countries are more likely to be at a point like where growth in GDP is relatively 0000

Growth in real GDP per capita Initial level of real GDP per capita Refer to Figure 11-5. Based on the "catch-up line" drawn above, poorer countries are more likely to be at a point like GDP is relatively O A; low; B; high A; high; B; low B; low; A; high B; high; A; low where growth in while richer countries are more likely to be at a point like where growth in GDP is relatively 0000

Exploring Economics

8th Edition

ISBN:9781544336329

Author:Robert L. Sexton

Publisher:Robert L. Sexton

Chapter20: Economic Growth In The Global Economy

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

What do the growth accounting studies conclude are the determinants of growth? Which is more important, the determinants or how they am combined?
An economy starts off with a GDP per capita of 5,000. How large will the GDP per capita be if it grows at an annual rate of 2 for 20 years? 2 for 40 years? 4 for 40 years? 6 for 40 years?
The following table shows the GDP per capita of various countries forthe years 1960 and 2010 in PPP-adjusted 2005 dollars. The table alsocontains the implied growth rates, which show how much on average eachcountry needed to grow each year to reach the 2010 level of GDP per capitastarting from the 1960 level of GDP per capita. Use the table to answer thefollowing questions. 1. During 1960-2010, which countries failed to reduce the gap betweentheir GDP per capita and the U.S. GDP per capita?
The following table shows the GDP per capita of various countries forthe years 1960 and 2010 in PPP-adjusted 2005 dollars. The table alsocontains the implied growth rates, which show how much on average eachcountry needed to grow each year to reach the 2010 level of GDP per capitastarting from the 1960 level of GDP per capita. Use the table to answer thefollowing questions. 1. During 1960-2010, which countries were able to reduce the gap betweentheir GDP per capita and the U.S. GDP per capita?
The following table shows the GDP per capita of various countries forthe years 1960 and 2010 in PPP-adjusted 2005 dollars. The table alsocontains the implied growth rates, which show how much on average eachcountry needed to grow each year to reach the 2010 level of GDP per capitastarting from the 1960 level of GDP per capita. Use the table to answer thefollowing questions. 1. Why have some countries reduced the gap between their incomes andthat of the United States and other countries failed to do so?
US real GDP 2021: $21.12T. US population: 330 million. China real GDP 2021 $12T. China population: 1.5 billion. (these figures are hypothetical). Assume the Chinese real GDP is growing at 7%/year. a. what will be the (approximate) Chinese real GDP in 2031? b. In what year will Chinese real GDP per capita equal (approximately) the 2021 US real GDP per capita?
Consider the following data for a particular country. Year 1 Population (Millions) - 400 Real GDP (Trillions of $) - 16 Year 2 Population ( MIllinois ) - 480 Real GDO ( Trillions of $ ) - 24 Instructions: Enter your answers as a whole number. a. What is the growth rate of real GDP from year 1 to year 2 -blank percent b. What is the growth rate of real GDP per capita from year 1 to year 2 -blank percent Note: Donot given direct answer
Say that the average worker in Canada has a productivity level of $30 per hour while the average worker in the United Kingdom has a productivity level of $25 per hour (both measured in U.S. dollars). Over the next five years, say that worker productivity in Canada grows at 1% per year while worker productivity intheUKgrows3%peryear.Afterfiveyears,whowill have the higher productivity level, and by how much?
Many demographers predict that the UnitedStates will have zero population growth in thetwenty-first century, in contrast to average popu-lation growth of about 1 percent per year in thetwentieth century. Use the Solow model to fore-cast the effect of this slowdown in populationgrowth on the growth of total output and the growth of output per person. Consider theeffects both in the steady state and in the transi-tion between steady states.
Exercise 2: Growth and developmentCountries 1 and 2 have the production function: Yt = AiKαt L1−αt , where country 1 hasTotal Factor Productivity (TFP) of A1 = 25, country 2 has TFP A2 = 100, and α = 0.35for both. In the two countries population is constant and there is no technological progress.Every year capital depreciates by 6% in both countries. Country 1 saves 40% of output, andcountry 2 saves 20%.a) Write down the function of production per unit of labor. Suppose the two countriesstart with an initial capital stock (per unit of labor) of 500, what are the initial income andconsumption per unit of labor in both countries?b) Determine their steady state levels of capital, income and consumption per unit oflabor.c) Determine the difference in their steady state level of income per unit of labor, andhow much of that difference is due to differences in TFP and how much is due to differencesin capital per unit of labor.d) Suppose now that country 2 suddenly has access to the country 1…
explain 1.Orthodox or conventional economists say that to address unequal growth between the rich and thepoor, the world economy needs to grow more. Do you agree with this idea? Why or why not? 2.What does the term “de-develop” mean? Is it a positive or a negative idea? 3. According to investopdia.com, a steady-state economy is an economy structured to balance growt hwith environmental integrity, seeking to find an equilibrium between production growth andpopulation growth. This type of economy aims for the efficient use of natural resources but alsoseeks a fair distribution of the wealth generated from the development of those resources. Is thistype of economy more plausible than continued, unlimited economic growth? Why or why not?
if a nation real gdp is growing by 3.5 percent per year , its real GDP will double in aproxiately 1. 41.1 years 2, 20.6 years 3, 10.3 years 4, 72 years