It has been suggested that one of the problems of having a user closely involved with a software development team is that they ‘go native’. That is, they adopt the outlook of the development team and lose sight of the needs of their user colleagues. Suggest three ways how you might avoid this problem and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.

It has been suggested that one of the problems of having a user closely involved with a software development team is that they ‘go native’. That is, they adopt the outlook of the development team and lose sight of the needs of their user colleagues. Suggest three ways how you might avoid this problem and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.

Principles of Information Systems (MindTap Course List)

12th Edition

ISBN:9781285867168

Author:Ralph Stair, George Reynolds

Publisher:Ralph Stair, George Reynolds

Chapter12: Systems Development: Investigation, Analysis, And Design

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2CTQ2

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

One of the problems of having a user closely involved with a software development team is that they “go native.” That is, they adopt the outlook of the development team and lose sight of the needs of their user colleagues. Suggest three ways how you might avoid this problem, and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.
The user may "go native" if they are involved too much in the software development process. In other words, they stop thinking like their user colleagues and start thinking like the development team. Give three workable answers to this challenge and discuss their benefits and drawbacks.
When a user is actively involved in the creation of software, there is a risk that the user would "go native." This is one of the potential downsides of this approach. In other words, they adopt the viewpoint of the development team and become blind to the requirements posed by their user colleagues. Give this problem three different viable approaches, and discuss the benefits and drawbacks associated with each one.
One of the downsides of associating a user directly with a software development team is that the user may become "native." Instead of considering the needs of their users, they focus on what the development team has to say. Identify and compare the advantages and disadvantages of three different approaches to this problem.
One of the drawbacks of involving a user directly with a software development team is that the user may "go native." That is, they embrace the development team's perspective and lose sight of their user colleagues' demands. Provide three possible solutions to this issue and evaluate the merits and downsides of each.
Q. It has been suggested that one of the problems of having a user closely involved with a software development team is that they ‘go native’. That is, they adopt the outlook of the development team and lose sight of the needs of their user colleagues. Suggest three ways how you might avoid this problem and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.
One of the problems of having a user closely involved with a software development team is that they may forget the requirements of the organization they represent. That is, they adopt the outlook of the development team and lose sight of the needs of their user colleagues. Suggest one way how you might avoid this problem and discuss at least one advantage and one disadvantage of your approach to solving this problem.
In the realm of software engineering, what would you say are the top four qualities that can be compiled? ... In order to improve software performance as a whole, please explain how the other four characteristics may be included into the development cycle.
One of the potential consequences of actively incorporating a user in the process of developing software is that the user may "go native." That is, they adopt the viewpoint of the development team and lose track of the needs of their user colleagues in the process. Give this problem three different potential solutions, and analyse both the positive and negative aspects of each one.
If at all possible, could you clarify the metrics involved in the software development process? Everything needs to be thoroughly debated.
Software engineers would do well to ask themselves this. What are your suggestions for optimizing the efficiency of the software development life cycle?
Could you please expand on the software development process metrics?This circumstance calls for a thorough analysis of all relevant factors.