In 2015, Forbes magazine listed Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft, as the richest person in the United States. His personal wealth was estimated to be $76 billion. Given that there were about 322 million people living in the United States that year, how much could each person have received if Gates’s wealth had been divided equally among the population of the United States?

In 2015, Forbes magazine listed Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft, as the richest person in the United States. His personal wealth was estimated to be $76 billion. Given that there were about 322 million people living in the United States that year, how much could each person have received if Gates’s wealth had been divided equally among the population of the United States?

Economics:

10th Edition

ISBN:9781285859460

Author:BOYES, William

Publisher:BOYES, William

Chapter33: Income, Income Distribution, And Poverty

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5E

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Why are the poorest members of society the greatest beneficiaries in the Difference principle of John Rawls?
Why is the typical American today more than 10 times richer than thetypical American a century ago?
According to John Rawls, society gains more from improving the welfare of the rich household.
Define economics in terms of wealth
Suppose that Eric believes that the government should aim to raise the welfare of the poorest people in society, because if we all started in the exact same position in life and then created rules and laws to obey as a society, people would be concerned about ending up at the bottom of the income distribution. Which redistributive philosophy is consistent with Eric's view? Utilitarianism Liberalism Libertarianism.
What consumption differences might you expect to observe between families characterized as underprivileged versus those whose income is average for its social class? Do you have a tendency to overestimate the class you are in? If so, why? If not, why?
Using the diagram above, which of the following is true? a. In country S the poorest 30 percent of the population receive 13 percent of the available income in country S. b. In country T the richest 10 percent of the population receive 23 percent of the available income in country T. c. In country S the richest 10 percent of the population receive 55 percent of the available income in country S. d. Country S has a more equal distribution of income than does country T. e. None of the above is true.
Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook and Elon Musk of Space X have taken risks to build to their businesses and been successful at it. The fundamental premise for their success mostly hinges on the ownership of private property and free market forces. For billionaires like them who have made their wealth mostly based on their own effort and perseverance, would it be fair to impose high income tax on them to redistribute their wealth to help the poor?
Explain why a lump-sum government transfer can entice some workers to stop working (and entices no one to start working) while the earned income tax credit can entice some people who otherwise would not work to start working (and entices no one to stop working).
International data show a positive correlation between income per person and the health of the population. Explain how higher income might cause better health outcomes. Explain how better health outcomes might cause higher income.
Income inequality is necessary for Pareto optimality so that people will work as hard as they can.” “If income is distributed equally, then there must be Pareto optimality because you can’t make one person better off without making someone else worse off.” Are these statements true or false? Why or why not?
If anyone could answer both of these question, I would be very thankful.