Let ƒ : (a, b) → R. Show by example that the convergence of the sequence in part (a) need not imply the existence of f' (xo), and demonstrate that your example works.

Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
13th Edition
ISBN:9781133382119
Author:Swokowski
Publisher:Swokowski
Chapter10: Sequences, Series, And Probability
Section10.1: Infinite Sequences And Summation Notation
Problem 72E
icon
Related questions
Topic Video
Question
100%
Let f : (a,b) ·
→ R.
Show by example that the convergence of the sequence in part (a) need not imply the existence of
f'(xo), and demonstrate that your example works.
Transcribed Image Text:Let f : (a,b) · → R. Show by example that the convergence of the sequence in part (a) need not imply the existence of f'(xo), and demonstrate that your example works.
Expert Solution
Step 1

Given:

f:(a,b)R

f'(xo)

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Sequence
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, advanced-math and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra
ISBN:
9781133382119
Author:
Swokowski
Publisher:
Cengage
College Algebra
College Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781938168383
Author:
Jay Abramson
Publisher:
OpenStax