Merck & Cd. included the following footnote in its 2016 Form 10-K: --- Environmental Matters The Company believes that there are no compliance issues associated with applicable environmental laws and regulations that would have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company is also remediating environmental contamination resulting from past industrial activity at certain of its sites. Expenditures for remediation and environmental liabilities were $11 million in 2016, and are estimated at $44 million in the aggregate for the years 2017 through 2021. These amounts do not consider potential recoveries from other parties. The Company has taken an active role in identifying and accruing for these costs and in management's opinion, the liabilities for all environmental matters that are probable and reasonably estimable have been accrued and totaled $83 million and $109 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. These liabilities are undiscounted, do not consider potential recoveries from other parties and will be paid out over the periods of remediation for the applicable sites, which are expected to occur primarily over the next 15 years. Although it is not possible to predict with certainty the outcome of these matters, or the ultimate costs of remediation, management does not believe that any reasonably possible expenditures that may be incurred in excess of the liabilities accrued should exceed $64 million in the aggregate. Management also does not believe that these expenditures should result in a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations, liquidity, or capital resources for any year. Required: а. How does Merck account for environmental liabilities that are probable and reasonably estimable? At December 31, 2016, how much were these liabilities? b. How does Merck account for environmental liabilities that are reasonably possible? At December 31, 2016, how much were these liabilities? The footnote mentions $83 million and $44 million as estimated future expenditures. Explain what each of these amounts represents and why they differ. с.

Financial Reporting, Financial Statement Analysis and Valuation
8th Edition
ISBN:9781285190907
Author:James M. Wahlen, Stephen P. Baginski, Mark Bradshaw
Publisher:James M. Wahlen, Stephen P. Baginski, Mark Bradshaw
Chapter6: Accounting Quality
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 20PC
icon
Related questions
Question

Answer a,b,c.if answered within 45mins,it would be appreciable!!!

iMerck & Cd. included the following footnote in its 2016 Form 10-K:
Environmental Matters
The Company believes that there are no compliance issues associated with applicable environmental laws and regulations
that would have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company is also remediating environmental contamination
resulting from past industrial activity at certain of its sites. Expenditures for remediation and environmental liabilities were $11 million
in 2016, and are estimated at $44 million in the aggregate for the years 2017 through 2021. These amounts do not consider potential
recoveries from other parties. The Company has taken an active rolein identifying and accruing for these costs and in management's opinion,
the liabilities for all environmental matters that are probable and reasonably estimable have been accrued and totaled $83 million and $109
million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. These liabilities are undiscounted, do not consider potential recoveries from
other parties and will be paid out over the periods of remediation for the applicable sites, which are expected to occur primarily over the next 15 years.
Although it is not possible to predict with certainty the outcome of these matters, or the ultimate costs of remediation, management does not
believe that any reasonably possible expenditures that may be incurred in excess of the liabilities accrued should exceed $64 million in the aggregate.
Management also does not believe that these expenditures should result in a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of
operations, liquidity, or capital resources for any year.
Required:
а.
How does Merck account for environmental liabilities that are probable and reasonably estimable? At December 31, 2016, how much were these liabilities?
b.
How does Merck account for environmental liabilities that are reasonably possible? At December 31, 2016, how much were these liabilities?
с.
The footnote mentions $83 million and $44 million as estimated future expenditures. Explain what each of these amounts represents and why they differ.
Transcribed Image Text:iMerck & Cd. included the following footnote in its 2016 Form 10-K: Environmental Matters The Company believes that there are no compliance issues associated with applicable environmental laws and regulations that would have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company is also remediating environmental contamination resulting from past industrial activity at certain of its sites. Expenditures for remediation and environmental liabilities were $11 million in 2016, and are estimated at $44 million in the aggregate for the years 2017 through 2021. These amounts do not consider potential recoveries from other parties. The Company has taken an active rolein identifying and accruing for these costs and in management's opinion, the liabilities for all environmental matters that are probable and reasonably estimable have been accrued and totaled $83 million and $109 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. These liabilities are undiscounted, do not consider potential recoveries from other parties and will be paid out over the periods of remediation for the applicable sites, which are expected to occur primarily over the next 15 years. Although it is not possible to predict with certainty the outcome of these matters, or the ultimate costs of remediation, management does not believe that any reasonably possible expenditures that may be incurred in excess of the liabilities accrued should exceed $64 million in the aggregate. Management also does not believe that these expenditures should result in a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations, liquidity, or capital resources for any year. Required: а. How does Merck account for environmental liabilities that are probable and reasonably estimable? At December 31, 2016, how much were these liabilities? b. How does Merck account for environmental liabilities that are reasonably possible? At December 31, 2016, how much were these liabilities? с. The footnote mentions $83 million and $44 million as estimated future expenditures. Explain what each of these amounts represents and why they differ.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Analytical Techniques
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Financial Reporting, Financial Statement Analysis…
Financial Reporting, Financial Statement Analysis…
Finance
ISBN:
9781285190907
Author:
James M. Wahlen, Stephen P. Baginski, Mark Bradshaw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment
Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment
Accounting
ISBN:
9781305224414
Author:
JENNINGS
Publisher:
Cengage
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q…
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q…
Accounting
ISBN:
9781305080577
Author:
Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:
South-Western College Pub
Intermediate Accounting: Reporting And Analysis
Intermediate Accounting: Reporting And Analysis
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337788281
Author:
James M. Wahlen, Jefferson P. Jones, Donald Pagach
Publisher:
Cengage Learning