Movie expenditures, in billions of dollars, on advertising in a certain format from 1995 to 2004 can be approximated by 0.02t + 0.31 if t 54 f(t) = -0.05t + 1.4 if t > 4, where t is time in years since 1995. (a) Compute lim f(t). (If an answer does not exist, enter DNE.) t-4 Interpret the answer. Shortly --Select--- 1999 (t = 4), annual advertising expenditures were close to $ billion. Compute lim f(t). (If an answer does not exist, enter DNE.) t+4+ Interpret the answer. Shortly -Select--- 1999 (t = 4), annual advertising expenditures were close to $ billion. (b) Is the function f continuous at t = 4? O Yes O No What does the answer tell you about movie advertising expenditures? Movie advertising expenditures--Select--- v in 1999.

Movie expenditures, in billions of dollars, on advertising in a certain format from 1995 to 2004 can be approximated by 0.02t + 0.31 if t 54 f(t) = -0.05t + 1.4 if t > 4, where t is time in years since 1995. (a) Compute lim f(t). (If an answer does not exist, enter DNE.) t-4 Interpret the answer. Shortly --Select--- 1999 (t = 4), annual advertising expenditures were close to $ billion. Compute lim f(t). (If an answer does not exist, enter DNE.) t+4+ Interpret the answer. Shortly -Select--- 1999 (t = 4), annual advertising expenditures were close to $ billion. (b) Is the function f continuous at t = 4? O Yes O No What does the answer tell you about movie advertising expenditures? Movie advertising expenditures--Select--- v in 1999.

Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry

13th Edition

ISBN:9781133382119

Author:Swokowski

Publisher:Swokowski

Chapter4: Polynomial And Rational Functions

Section4.5: Rational Functions

Problem 8E

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Let h(x) = (x2 - 2x - 3)/(x2 - 4x + 3). a. Make a table of the values of h at x = 2.9, 2.99, 2.999, and so on. Then estimate limx-->3 h(x). What estimate do you arrive at if you evaluate h at x = 3.1, 3.01, 3.001,......instead? b. Support your conclusions in part (a) by graphing h near c = 3 and using Zoom and Trace to estimate y-values on the graph as x--> 3.
Let ƒ(x) = (x^2 - 9)/(x + 3). a. Make a table of the values of ƒ at the points x = -3.1, -3.01, -3.001, and so on as far as your calculator can go. Then estimate limxS -3 ƒ(x). What estimate do you arrive at if you evaluate ƒ at x = -2.9, -2.99, -2.999,c instead? b. Support your conclusions in part (a) by graphing ƒ near c = -3 and using Zoom and Trace to estimate y-values on the graph as xS -3. c. Find limxS -3 ƒ(x) algebraically.
Let ƒ(x) = (x2 - 1)/( | x| - 1). Make tables of the values of ƒ at values of x that approach c = -1 from above and below. Then estimate limx→ -1 ƒ(x).
Let G(x) = (x + 6)/(x2 + 4x - 12). a. Make a table of the values of G at x = -5.9, -5.99, -5.999, and so on. Then estimate limx--> -6 G(x). What estimate do you arrive at if you evaluate G at x = -6.1, -6.01, -6.001, .....instead? b. Support your conclusions in part (a) by graphing G and using Zoom and Trace to estimate y-values on the graph as x --> -6
2. Let g(x)= {-1/5x + 2, x<0 -2, x=0 x+2, x>0. Does the lim g(x) x→0 exist? If yes, give its value. If not, why?
Given lim (4x-3) as x approaches 1. Use the definition of a limt to find a number delta such that the absolute value of x-a is less than delta when the absolute value of f(x)-L is less than 0.08
Movie expenditures, in billions of dollars, on advertising in a certain format from 1995 to 2004 can be approximated by f(t) = 0.04t + 0.33 if t ≤ 4 −0.01t + 1.5 if t > 4, where t is time in years since 1995. (a) Compute lim t→4− f(t). (If an answer does not exist, enter DNE.) Interpret the answer. Shortly 1999 (t = 4), annual advertising expenditures were close to $ billion. Compute lim t→4+ f(t). (If an answer does not exist, enter DNE.) Interpret the answer. Shortly 1999 (t = 4), annual advertising expenditures were close to $ billion. (b) Is the function f continuous at t = 4? YesNo What does the answer tell you about movie advertising expenditures? Movie advertising expenditures in 1999.
Let ƒ(x) = (x2 - 9)/(x + 3). a. Make a table of the values of ƒ at the points x = -3.1, -3.01, -3.001, and so on as far as your calculator can go. Then estimate limx--> -3 ƒ(x). What estimate do you arrive at if you evaluate ƒ at x = -2.9, -2.99, -2.999,...... instead? b. Support your conclusions in part (a) by graphing ƒ near c = -3 and using Zoom and Trace to estimate y-values on the graph as x -->-3.
Evaluate the limit numerically or state that the limit does not exist. (Round your answer to three decimal places. If you need to use or –, enter INFINITY or –INFINITY, respectively. If an answer does not exist, enter DNE.) lim x → 7+ x-8 x2-49
The graph of f(x) = 2x2/(x2 + 2) is shown. (a) Find L = limx ∞ f(x). (b) Determine x1 and x2 in terms of ε. (c) Determine M, where M > 0, such that ∣ f(x) − L∣ < ε for x > M. (d) Determine N, where N < 0, such that ∣ f(x) − L∣ < ε for x < N.
Find the limit. lim x → 2− e3/(2 − x)
4. Given f(x)= { 1, if x < 0 x-1, if x ≥ 0 , estimate lim f(x) x→0- a.1 b. 0 c. does not exist d. -1 5. Given f(x)= { 1/x, if x < 4 x2, if x ≥ 4 , estimate lim f(x) x→4+ a. 1/4 b. 2 c. does not exist d. 16