Ms. Vincent resides in a jurisdiction with a 35 percent income tax. Ms. Vincent has $40,000 that she could invest in bonds paying 8 percent annual interest. She is also considering spending the $40,000 on a new luxury automobile. Ms. Vincent is having a hard time deciding between these two alternatives. Why might her decision be easier if the jurisdiction increases its income tax rate to 50 percent?

Ms. Vincent resides in a jurisdiction with a 35 percent income tax. Ms. Vincent has $40,000 that she could invest in bonds paying 8 percent annual interest. She is also considering spending the $40,000 on a new luxury automobile. Ms. Vincent is having a hard time deciding between these two alternatives. Why might her decision be easier if the jurisdiction increases its income tax rate to 50 percent?

Individual Income Taxes

43rd Edition

ISBN:9780357109731

Author:Hoffman

Publisher:Hoffman

Chapter5: Gross Income: Exclusions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 16DQ: Tammy, a resident of Virginia, is considering purchasing a North Carolina bond that yields 4.6%...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Bonnie is married and has one child. She owns Bonnies Rib Joint, which produces a taxable income of approximately 120,000 per year. a. Assume that Bonnies taxable income is 40,000 without considering the income from the rib joint. How much tax will she pay on the 120,000 of income from the rib joint? b. You work for the firm that prepares Bonnies tax return. Bonnie has asked the partner for whom you work to advise her on how she might lower her taxes. The partner has assigned you this task. Draft a memorandum to the partner that contains at least two options Bonnie could use to lower her taxes. For each option, explain the calculations that support the tax savings from your recommendation.
Tammy, a resident of Virginia, is considering purchasing a North Carolina bond that yields 4.6% before tax. She is in the 35% Federal marginal tax bracket and the 5% state marginal tax bracket. She is aware that State of Virginia bonds of comparable risk are yielding 4.5%. However, the Virginia bonds are exempt from Virginia tax, but the North Carolina bond interest is taxable in Virginia. Which of the two options will provide the greater after-tax return to Tammy? Tammy can deduct any state taxes paid on her Federal income tax return. In your analysis, assume that the bond amount is 100,000.
On June 30, 2019, Kelly sold property for 240,000 cash and a 960,000 note due on September 30, 2020. The note will also pay 6% interest, which is slightly higher than the Federal rate. Kellys cost of the property was 400,000. She is concerned that Congress may increase the tax rate that will apply when the note is collected. Kellys after-tax rate of return on investments is 6%. a. What can Kelly do to avoid the expected higher tax rate? b. Assuming that Kellys marginal combined Federal and state tax rate is 25% in 2019, how much would the tax rates need to increase to make the option identified in part (a) advisable?
Floyd, a cash basis taxpayer, has received an offer to purchase his land. The cash basis buyer will pay him either 100,000 at closing or 50,000 at closing and 56,000 two years after the date of closing. If Floyd recognizes the entire gain in the current year, his marginal tax rate will be 25% (combined Federal and state rates). However, if he spreads the gain over the two years, his combined marginal tax rate on the gain will be only 20%. Floyd does not consider the buyer a credit risk, and he understands that shifting the gain to next year with an installment sale will save taxes. Still, he realizes that the deferred payment will, in effect, earn only 6,000 for waiting two years for the other 50,000. Floyd believes he can earn a 10% before-tax rate of return on his after-tax cash. Floyds adjusted basis for the land is 25,000, the buyer is also a cash basis taxpayer, and the short-term Federal rate is 4%. Floyd has asked you to evaluate the two alternatives on an after-tax basis.