Part 1. Experiment to determine the specific binding of [3H]-flunitrazepam as defined by three different competing ligands Total binding Non-specific binding Specific binding c.p.m. 120.67 Total binding c.p.m. 143.00 Total binding c.p.m. 138 Diazepam c.p.m. 110.67 Flunitrazepam 128.00 2416.00 Non-specific binding Specific binding c.p.m. c.p.m. 133.00 c.p.m. c.p.m. Midazolam 2393.67 Non-specific binding Specific binding c.p.m. 2398.67 % Specific binding 95.24310118 % Specific binding 94.36268068 % Specific binding 94.55978975 The receptor or drug target in this case was the rat GABAA receptor obtained from homogenised rat brain cortical tissue. Using the same radioligand binding technique, what other way could you look at ligand affinity to GABAA receptors without using GABAA receptors derived from homogenised tissue? What are the advantages/disadvantages to each strategy?

3-2-1 Code It
6th Edition
ISBN:9781337660549
Author:GREEN
Publisher:GREEN
Chapter8: Introduction To Cpt Coding
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 9MC
icon
Related questions
Question
x₂ x² A2 A
V
Part 1. Experiment to determine the specific binding of [3H]-flunitrazepam
as defined by three different competing ligands
I
Total binding
c.p.m.
Total binding Non-specific binding Specific binding % Specific binding
c.p.m.
120.67
143.00
Total binding
c.p.m.
138
c.p.m.
English (United Kingdom)
110.67
Diazepam
Flunitrazepam
c.p.m.
133.00
128.00
Non-specific binding Specific binding
c.p.m.
Non-specific binding
c.p.m.
2416.00
c.p.m.
Midazolam
♫
2393.67
♥
Specific binding
c.p.m.
2398.67
95.24310118
átv A
% Specific binding
94.36268068
% Specific binding
The receptor or drug target in this case was the rat GABAA receptor obtained from
homogenised rat brain cortical tissue. Using the same radioligand binding technique,
what other way could you look at ligand affinity to GABAA receptors without using
GABAA receptors derived from homogenised tissue? What are the
advantages/disadvantages to each strategy?
94.55978975
Styles St
P
Focus
each strategy?
N
E
X
Transcribed Image Text:x₂ x² A2 A V Part 1. Experiment to determine the specific binding of [3H]-flunitrazepam as defined by three different competing ligands I Total binding c.p.m. Total binding Non-specific binding Specific binding % Specific binding c.p.m. 120.67 143.00 Total binding c.p.m. 138 c.p.m. English (United Kingdom) 110.67 Diazepam Flunitrazepam c.p.m. 133.00 128.00 Non-specific binding Specific binding c.p.m. Non-specific binding c.p.m. 2416.00 c.p.m. Midazolam ♫ 2393.67 ♥ Specific binding c.p.m. 2398.67 95.24310118 átv A % Specific binding 94.36268068 % Specific binding The receptor or drug target in this case was the rat GABAA receptor obtained from homogenised rat brain cortical tissue. Using the same radioligand binding technique, what other way could you look at ligand affinity to GABAA receptors without using GABAA receptors derived from homogenised tissue? What are the advantages/disadvantages to each strategy? 94.55978975 Styles St P Focus each strategy? N E X
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
3-2-1 Code It
3-2-1 Code It
Biology
ISBN:
9781337660549
Author:
GREEN
Publisher:
Cengage
Curren'S Math For Meds: Dosages & Sol
Curren'S Math For Meds: Dosages & Sol
Nursing
ISBN:
9781305143531
Author:
CURREN
Publisher:
Cengage
Essentials of Pharmacology for Health Professions
Essentials of Pharmacology for Health Professions
Nursing
ISBN:
9781305441620
Author:
WOODROW
Publisher:
Cengage
Biochemistry
Biochemistry
Biochemistry
ISBN:
9781305577206
Author:
Reginald H. Garrett, Charles M. Grisham
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Nutrition Now
Nutrition Now
Health & Nutrition
ISBN:
9781337415408
Author:
Brown
Publisher:
Cengage