Q) Larry was accepted at three different universities and must choose one. Elite U costs $50,000 per year and did not offer him any financial aid. He values attending Elite U at 60,000 per year. State College costs $30,000 per year, and offered Larry an annual $10,000 scholarship. Larry values attending State College at $40,000 per year. NoName U costs $20,000 per year, and offered him a full $20,000 annual scholarship. He values attending NoName at $15,000 per year. What is Larry's opportunity cost of attending Elite U? a. $15,000 b. $20,000 C. $50,000 d. $70,000 Explain it correctly

Q) Larry was accepted at three different universities and must choose one. Elite U costs $50,000 per year and did not offer him any financial aid. He values attending Elite U at 60,000 per year. State College costs $30,000 per year, and offered Larry an annual $10,000 scholarship. Larry values attending State College at $40,000 per year. NoName U costs $20,000 per year, and offered him a full $20,000 annual scholarship. He values attending NoName at $15,000 per year. What is Larry's opportunity cost of attending Elite U? a. $15,000 b. $20,000 C. $50,000 d. $70,000 Explain it correctly

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

5th Edition

ISBN:9781337106665

Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Chapter3: Benefits, Costs, And Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4MC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Cost-Benefit Analysis Suppose you can take one of two summer jobs. In the first job as a flight attendant, with a salary of $5,000, you estimate the probability you will die is 1 in 40,000. Alternatively, you could drive a truck transporting hazardous materials, which pays $12,000 and for which the probability of death is 1 in 10,000. Suppose that you're indifferent between the two jobs except for the pay and the chance of death. If you choose the job as a flight attendant, what does this say about the value you place on your life?
Explain why the answer I chose was wrong, find the right answer, and explain why it is correct
Suppose that following graduation you have four job offers. Job 1 is in Spokane Washington, and pays a salary of $50,000 per year, Job 2 is in San Jose California and pays $60,000 per year, Job 3 is in Raleigh NC and pays $45,000 per year, Job 4 is in Sarasota Florida and pays $40,000 per year. If you choose job 4, what is the opportunity cost of this decision? Group of answer choices The full (combined) value of the other three jobs, including salary, benefits and living in those cities. The full value of Job 1, since this is the highest paying alternative. The full value of whichever job would have been your second choice. Zero. $20,000, because this is the difference between the salary you chose and the maximum salary that you gave up.
Purposeful behavior means that: people are selfish in their decision-making. people weigh costs and benefits to make decisions. people are immune from emotions affecting their decisions. decision-makers do not make mistakes when weighing costs and benefits.
Show full answers to part d)
List and explain the three types of flexible budget variance.
True or false 1. A perceived disadvantage of Rawls's social justice theory is that it does not consider the fact that people would not want to maximize benefits for the least advantaged persons 2. Ethical relativism is a moral theory which holds that individuals must decide what is ethical based on their own feelings about what is right and wrong. 3. Utilitarianism is a moral theory that chooses the greatest good to society but does not mean the greatest good for the greatest number of people. 4. According to Rawls's “social justice” theory, a person who is in a state of "veil of ignorance" is best fit to select the fairest possible ethical principles. Please help, & thank you!
A new manager recently was given an assignment to create two possible wage schemes for a design firm. The manager came up with the following packages: (1) Each employee will start at RM15 per hour and will work eight hours per day; (2) each employee will receive $8 per hour and one-tenth of 1 percent of profits (expected profits are RM80,000 per day if everyone puts out maximum effort). Which program will motivate the employees more? Which program would you choose? Why?
How is top-down budgeting different from bottom-up budgeting? Which of these methods is more widely accepted? What have been some of the attempts to reform bottom-up budgeting?
What role best fits the following situation? Manny wants to be involved in a business but is not sure which type of business to join or create. He has capital to invest. He has a good network of potential investors and partners. He has no experience in management. A. General partner in a limited partnership. B. Limited partner in a limited partnership. C. Neither a limited or general partner would be a good choice.
Which of these is a guideline for making a decision? Guaranteed gain Marginal cost is less than marginal price. Marginal utility is greater than marginal cost. Opportunity cost is less than marginal cost.
Ten workers work jointly on a project. All 10 workers are equally skilled. The total value of the output produced is $100 times the sum of the number of hours worked by all 10 workers. Each worker's utility is equal to his income minus the square of the number of hours he works. Each worker is selfish. The employers have no way of keeping track of any individual's work effort, so they decide to let each person work as long as he wants to and they divide the total value of the output equally among the workers. How much income will each worker get?