Suppose Justine and Sarah are playing the dictator game. Justine is the dictator and has $100 to allocate. Based on repeated experiments of che dictator game, what is the least likely outcome for this game? Multiple Choice $100 for Justine and $0 for Sarah. $58 for Justine and $42 for Sarah. $50 for Justine and $50 for Sarah. $0 for Justine and $100 for Sarah.

Suppose Justine and Sarah are playing the dictator game. Justine is the dictator and has $100 to allocate. Based on repeated experiments of che dictator game, what is the least likely outcome for this game? Multiple Choice $100 for Justine and $0 for Sarah. $58 for Justine and $42 for Sarah. $50 for Justine and $50 for Sarah. $0 for Justine and $100 for Sarah.

Economics (MindTap Course List)

13th Edition

ISBN:9781337617383

Author:Roger A. Arnold

Publisher:Roger A. Arnold

Chapter5: Supply, Demand, And Price: Applications

Section5.3: Application 3: 10 A. M. Classes In College

Problem 1ST

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

To ensure safety and efficacy, the Food and Drug Administration regulates the medicines that pharmacies are allowed to sell in the US. Sometimes this means that a company must test a drug for years before receiving FDA approval and reaching the market. We can easily identify the "winners" in this system as those who are protected from unsafe drugs that might otherwise harm them. Who are the more "anonymous losers" who suffer due to the strict FDA medical regulations? Explain why according to the theory of rational ignorance, an individual will decide not to participate in the election process (vote).
Why might the multiple-play ultimatum game have a different result than the single-play ultimatum game? In the multiple-play ultimatum game, the first player generally offers less money to the second player than in the single-play ultimatum game. The multiple-play ultimatum game leads to a simpler equilibrium: the first player offers exactly half of the total sum to the second player. The multiple-play ultimatum game allows for players to send signals. Therefore, the receiver can punish a player who doesn’t share enough. The multiple-play ultimatum game generally results in less cooperation because both players fall into a back-and-forth pattern of trying to punish the other player.
Rational choice theory is an economic principle that assumes individuals always make prudent and logical decisions to maximize net benefit. True or false
Suppose Justine and Sarah are playing the ultimatum game. Justine is the proposer, has $140 to allocate, and Sarah can accept or reject the offer. Based on repeated experiments of the ultimatum game, what combination of payouts to Justine and Sarah is most likely to occur?.
Considering the given possible uses of candy, which of the four choices could be Pareto Efficient (assuming candy is a “good”)? Among the four choices, which policy would yield the highest value according to a “Rawlsian” welfare function? (assuming that sweet/candy is a “good”) Explain. CHOICE 1: Every student gets one candy. The remaining candies are thrown in the bin. CHOICE 2: One student gets all the candies CHOICE 3: Every student gets two candies except for one student, who gets no candy; the remaining go in the bin. CHOICE 4: All the candies go in the bin
The Condorcet paradox illustrates Arrow’simpossibility theorem by showing that pairwisemajority votinga. is inconsistent with the principle of unanimity.b. leads to social preferences that are not transitive.c. violates the independence of irrelevantalternatives.d. makes one person in effect a dictator.
Two players play the Ultimatum Game, in which they are to split $20. A purely rational agent would only reject an offer of … Group of answer choices... -$20 -$19 -$1 -$0 -$10
In a standard economic model, we generally assume the individual only cares about their own payoff. So, for example, utility of individual i is given by u = pi, where pi is the individual’s payoff. Suppose the individual is playing a dictator game with another partner j. How would you modify the utility function to explain the non-zero allocations to the partner that are typically observed?
Modified True or False: State whether each statement is true or false. If the statement is false, briefly explain why it is so, and then restate it to make it true. k. Pareto efficiency or Pareto optimality is a condition where no change is possible that will make some members of society better off without making some other members of society worse off.
Economic agents for example consumers or firms often do things Economic agents (for example, consumers or firms) often do things that at first glance seem to be inconsistent with their self-interest. People tip at restaurants and when they are on vacation even if they have no intention to return to the same place. Firms, sometimes, install costly pollution abatement equipment voluntarily. How can these deviations from Nash predictions be explained? Economic agents for example consumers or firms often do things
Mary earns $15 per hour, Paul earns $18 per hour, and Peter earns $22 per hour. Peter has three years of college, Paul has two, and Mary has one. The difference in their choice of years of education is due completely to different discount rates. How much can the available information reveal about each person’s discount rate?
Two players play the Ultimatum Game, in which they are to split $20. A purely rational agent would only reject an offer of …