Suppose that a, b, m, and n are integers (n, m positive) and suppose we know a = b (mod n) and n | m Can we safely conclude that a = b (mod m)? (a) True by transitivity (b) False because I can find small integers for which it fails. True, because congruence mod n has more equivalence classes so the conclusion is just a weaker (c) version of the hypothesis. True, because congruence mod n has fewer equivalence classes so the conclusion is just a weaker O (d) version of the hypothesis.

Elements Of Modern Algebra
8th Edition
ISBN:9781285463230
Author:Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie
Publisher:Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie
Chapter2: The Integers
Section2.5: Congruence Of Integers
Problem 39E
icon
Related questions
Question
Question 3:
Suppose that a, b, m, and n are integers (n, m positive) and suppose we know
a = b (mod n) and n | m
Can we safely conclude that a = b (mod m)?
O (a) True by transitivity
(b) False because I can find small integers for which it fails.
True, because congruence mod n has more equivalence classes so the conclusion is just a weaker
(c)
version of the hypothesis.
True, because congruence mod n has fewer equivalence classes so the conclusion is just a weaker
O (d)
version of the hypothesis.
Transcribed Image Text:Question 3: Suppose that a, b, m, and n are integers (n, m positive) and suppose we know a = b (mod n) and n | m Can we safely conclude that a = b (mod m)? O (a) True by transitivity (b) False because I can find small integers for which it fails. True, because congruence mod n has more equivalence classes so the conclusion is just a weaker (c) version of the hypothesis. True, because congruence mod n has fewer equivalence classes so the conclusion is just a weaker O (d) version of the hypothesis.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer