Suppose that an initial $ 10 billion increase in investment spending expands GDP by $ 10 billion in the first round of the multiplier process. Also suppose that GDP and consumption both rise by $ 6 billion in the second round of the process. Instructions: In parts a and b, round your answers to 1 decimal place. In part c enter your answer as a whole number. A) What is the MPC in this economy? B) What is the size of the multiplier? C) If, instead, GDP and consumption both rose by $ 8 billion in the second round, what would have been the size of the multiplier?

Suppose that an initial $ 10 billion increase in investment spending expands GDP by $ 10 billion in the first round of the multiplier process. Also suppose that GDP and consumption both rise by $ 6 billion in the second round of the process. Instructions: In parts a and b, round your answers to 1 decimal place. In part c enter your answer as a whole number. A) What is the MPC in this economy? B) What is the size of the multiplier? C) If, instead, GDP and consumption both rose by $ 8 billion in the second round, what would have been the size of the multiplier?

Economics For Today

10th Edition

ISBN:9781337613040

Author:Tucker

Publisher:Tucker

Chapter19: The Keynesian Model In Action

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 7SQP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose that an initial $10 billion increase in investment spending expands GDP by $10 billion in the first round of the multiplier process. Also suppose that GDP and consumption both rise by $6 billion in the second round of the process. what is the MPC? What is the size of the Multiplier? If, instead, GDP and consumption both rose by $8 billion in the second round, what would have been the size of the multiplier?
Suppose that the initial 10 billion increase in the investment spending expands GDP by 10 billion in the first round of multiplier process. If GDP and consumption both rise by 6 billion in the second round of the process, what is the MPC in this economy? What is the size of the multiplier? If instead, GP and consumption both Rose by 8 billion in the second round, what would’ve been the size of the multiplier?
What is the multiplier effect? What relationship does the MPC bear to the size of the multiplier? The MPS? What will the multiplier be when the MPS is 0, .4, .6, and 1? What will it be when the MPC is 1, .90, .67, .50, and 0? How much of a change in GDP will result if firms increase their level of investment by $8 billion and the MPC is .80? If the MPC is .67?
Is the relationship between changes in spending and changes in real GDP in the multiplier effect a direct (positive) relationship or is it an inverse (negative) relationship? How does the size of the multiplier relate to the size of the MPC? The MPS? What is the logic of the multiplier-MPC relationship?
The following are exogenous (not directly affected by income): G = 9 I = 14 X = M = 0 The consumption function is: C = k + cY, where k = 8, c = 0.6 What is the equilibrium level of GDP? State to ONE decimal place What is the multiplier for this economy? The following are exogenous (not directly affected by income): G = 11 I = 4 X = M = 0 The consumption function is: C = k + cY, where k = 3, c = 0.8 What is the equilibrium level of GDP? What is the multiplier? Same information as in the previous question: The following are exogenous (not directly affected by income): G = 11 I = 4 X = M = 0 The consumption function is: C = k + cY, where k = 3, c = 0.8 Imagine the maximum potential output or real GDP of this economy is 100. Assume that is the same as saying we reach the edge of the PPF at 100. Now assume we want to get that economy from the current level of GDP to its maximum potential of 100. We can do this in two ways - either increase government spending (G) or reduce taxes, (we…
How is it possible for investment spending to increase even in a period in which the real interest rate rises? Is the relationship between changes in spending and changes in real GDP in the multiplier effect a direct (positive) relationship or is it an inverse (negative) relationship? How does the size of the multiplier relate to the size of the MPC? The MPS? What is the logic of the multiplier-MPC relationship?
Explain how MPC and the multiplier effect would impact a government’s attempt to stimulate its economy in each of the following scenarios. To stimulate the economy already in a serious recession, the government spends a total of $700 million to construct nationwide highspeed internet infrastructure so that all areas of the country, especially the rural areas will have highspeed internet service.
Refer the table below and answer the questions that follow. Aggregate Output ($ million) Y Aggregate Consumption ($ million) C Aggregate Saving ($ million) S Planned Investment ($ million) I Aggregate Expenditure AE = C+I 2,000 1,500 700 2,400 1,800 700 2,800 2,100 700 3,200 2,400 700 3,600 2,700 700 Fill in the table and find the equilibrium income. Find the MPC, MPS and the multiplier. If the planned investment increases by $100 million find the new equilibrium level of income.
If national income now rises by £22 billion and as a result, the consumption of domestically produced goods rises to £80 billion. Calculate the marginal propensity to consume (MPC)What is the value of the multiplier? What is the value of the multiplier? Comment on the results in part (3) and (4).