Suppose that the domain of the propositional function P(x) consists of the integers 1, 2, 3, 4and 5. Express these statements without using quantifiers, instead using only negations,disjunctions and conjunctions.(a) IxP(x) (b) VxP(x) (c) ¬IXP(x) (d) ¬VXP(x)

Given: The domain of the propositional function P (x) consists of integers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. A…

Answered: Suppose that the domain of the…

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Let p and q be the propositions “Swimming at the New Jersey shore is allowed” and “Sharks have been spotted near the shore,” respectively. Express each of these compound propositions as an English sentence. a)¬q b)p∧q c)¬p∨q d)p→¬q e)¬q→p f)¬p→¬q g)p↔¬q h)¬p∧(p∨¬q)
Let P(x) and Q(x) be relations, with x a variable from a given domain of discourse U. The Axiom of the Hilbert deductive system for first-order logic applied below is "Axiom 1,2,3,4,5" ? ⊢ ∀x P(x) → (∃x Q(x) → ∀x P(x)) Consider the steps given below of a proof in the Hilbert deductive system and determine the reason that justifies each. ∀x A(x) ⊢ ∀x A(x) "?"∀x A(x) ⊢ ∀x A(x) → A(a) " ?"∀x A(x) ⊢ A(a) " ?"
Simplify using the Logical Equivalence Laws or Algebra of Propositions. Do not simplify by indicating the binaries. 22. (~P -> (P -> Q)) -> (Q -> (P -> P))
Let p and q be two propositions. Consider the following two statements in prepositional logic. S₁: (-p^(pv q)) → p S₂: q→(-p^ (pvq)) Which of them is tautology
Let P(x) be the statement “x can speak Russian” and let Q(x) be the statement “x knows C++”. Express each of these statements in terms P(x), Q(x), quantifiers and logical connectives. The domain for quantifiers consists of all students at Mines. There is a student at Mines who can speak Russian and who knows C++. Every student at your school either can speak Russian or knows C++.
Give the complete truth table of the following propositional form: ( ( p ∨ q ) → r ) ↔ ( ( p → q ) ∨ ( p → r ) ). Is this propositional form a tautology, a contradiction, or a contingency?
Consider the wffs:φ1 ≡ p1 → (p2 → (p3 → p4))φ2 ≡ (p1 ∧ p2 ∧ p3) → p4(a) Technically speaking, neither φ1 nor φ2 is well-formed since neither is allowed by the formal syntaxof propositional logic. Correct them. Note, however, that we will freely make such trivial ’errors’ throughout this semester (as do most such courses).(b) Use truth tables (in the form defined in this course) to show that φ1 ↔ φ2.(c) After internalizing an intuitive understanding of this equality, propose an extension of it to n atoms.(d) State the number of rows in a truth table for proving the extension
Consider the wffs:φ1 ≡ p1 → (p2 → (p3 → p4))φ2 ≡ (p1 ∧ p2 ∧ p3) → p4(a) Technically speaking, neither φ1 nor φ2 is well-formed since neither is allowed by the formal syntaxof propositional logic. Correct them. Note, however, that we will freely make such trivial ’errors’throughout this semester (as do most such courses).(b) Use truth tables (in the form defined in this course) to show that φ1 ↔ φ2.(c) After internalizing an intuitive understanding of this equality, propose an extension of it to natoms.(d) State the number of rows in a truth table for proving the extension.
Let p, q , r be well-formed formulas of propositional calculus. Determine if (p ∧ q) <-> ( ( p -> q ) ∧ ( q -> r ) ) is tautology, contradiction or contingency
Complete the axiomatization by using and add a rule of universal generalization (∀1∀1) ∀x A→A(y/x) ∀x A→A(y/x),provided yy is free for xx in AA (∀2∀2) ∀x(A→B) → (A→∀x B) ∀x(A→B) → (A→∀x B),provided xx does not occur free in A
1. In transforming a formula into an equivalent CNF, you can use the absorption laws to eliminate conjunctions within disjuntions, i.e. expressions such as p ˅ (q ˄ r) and (p ˄ q) ˅ r. True False 2. Let p, q, and r be propositional variables. Which of the following expressions would NOT be formulas in conjunctive normal form? (p ˄ ¬q) ˅ (¬r ˄ q ˄ p) ¬q p ˅ q ˅ ¬p p ˄ ¬p 3. Consider the propositional logic formula (p ˄ q) ˅ (r ˅ ¬s) From the options below, which one is the equivalent CNF? To determine the correct answer, transform the formula above into CNF using the steps learnt in this module. (p ˅ r ˅ s) ˄ (q ˅ r ˅ ¬s) (¬p ∨ r ∨ s) ∧ (¬q ∨ ¬r ∨ ¬s) (p ˅ r ˅ ¬s) ˄ (q ˅ r ˅ s) (p ˅ r ˅ ¬s) ˄ (q ˅ r ˅ ¬s)…
Consider the predicates Martian (x): x is a MartianisGreen(x): x is green Use equivalence laws of first-order logic to identify the expression that is logically equivalent to ∀x (Martian(x) ˄ isGreen(x)) Group of answer choices ∃x (Martian(x)) ˅ ∃x (isGreen(x)) ∃x (¬Martian(x)) ˄ ∃x (¬isGreen(x)) ∀x (Martian(x)) ˄ ∀x (isGreen(x)) ∀x (¬Martian(x)) ˄ ∀x (¬isGreen(x))

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Database System Concepts

Computer Science

ISBN:

9780078022159

Author:

Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:

McGraw-Hill Education

Starting Out with Python (4th Edition)

Computer Science

ISBN:

9780134444321

Author:

Tony Gaddis

Publisher:

PEARSON

Digital Fundamentals (11th Edition)

Computer Science

ISBN:

9780132737968

Author:

Thomas L. Floyd

Publisher:

PEARSON

Database System Concepts

Computer Science

ISBN:

9780078022159

Author:

Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:

McGraw-Hill Education

Starting Out with Python (4th Edition)

Computer Science

ISBN:

9780134444321

Author:

Tony Gaddis

Publisher:

PEARSON

Digital Fundamentals (11th Edition)

Computer Science

ISBN:

9780132737968

Author:

Thomas L. Floyd

Publisher:

PEARSON

C How to Program (8th Edition)

Computer Science

ISBN:

9780133976892

Author:

Paul J. Deitel, Harvey Deitel

Publisher:

PEARSON

Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag…

Computer Science

ISBN:

9781337627900

Author:

Carlos Coronel, Steven Morris

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Programmable Logic Controllers

Computer Science

ISBN:

9780073373843

Author:

Frank D. Petruzella

Publisher:

McGraw-Hill Education

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS

Suppose that the domain of the propositional function P(x) consists of the integers 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Express these statements without using quantifiers, instead using only negations, disjunctions and conjunctions. (a) IxP(x) (b) VxP(x) (c) ¬IXP(x) (d) ¬VXP(x)