The following table shows the performance criteria, weights, and scores (1 = worst, 10 = best) for a new product: a thermal storage air conditioner. If management wants to introduce just one new product and the highest total score of any of the other product ideas is 800, should the firm pursue making the air conditioner? Performance Criterion Weight (A) Score (B) Weighted Score (A x B) Market potential Unit profit margin Operations compatibility Competitive advantage Investment requirement Project risk 30 20 20 15 10 5 8 10 6 10 2 4 240 200 120 150 20 20 Weighted score = 750

The following table shows the performance criteria, weights, and scores (1 = worst, 10 = best) for a new product: a thermal storage air conditioner. If management wants to introduce just one new product and the highest total score of any of the other product ideas is 800, should the firm pursue making the air conditioner? Performance Criterion Weight (A) Score (B) Weighted Score (A x B) Market potential Unit profit margin Operations compatibility Competitive advantage Investment requirement Project risk 30 20 20 15 10 5 8 10 6 10 2 4 240 200 120 150 20 20 Weighted score = 750

Practical Management Science

6th Edition

ISBN:9781337406659

Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.

Publisher:WINSTON, Wayne L.

Chapter2: Introduction To Spreadsheet Modeling

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 21P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?
A hotel is runned by a manager and the owners propsoed a new proposal to increase their sales and if the manager does increases the sales they will pay him addiotional 10k but if they stick to their current situation what are the pros and cons, List 4 pros and 4 cons for status quo.
We're deciding between four alternatives, A, B, C, D. The four most important, criteria are C1,C2,C3 and C4. (i.e. price, time, ease of production, man-hours) Our baseline is the system we have in place at the moment. If an Alternative is better we give it a +1, if it's the same we give it a 0, and if it's worse we give it a -1. We have found that in In comparison with Baseline: Draw a Decision Matrix and indicate which Alternative is the best .
The production head at the All Paints and Surface Corp. would frequently stay back after office hours and experiment with new color combinations even though this was part of the new product development team’s job. As a result of these experiments, he came up with two new interior paint colors, foggy morning and mint julep. The new colors proved popular among test groups, and quickly became some of Omnitone’s best-selling products. Which of the following strategies does this scenario best illustrate? Multiple Choice intended strategy emergent strategy unrealized strategy tactical strategy
Herron Company is screening three new product ideas: A, B, and C. Resource constraints allow only one of them to be commercialized. The performance criteria and ratings, on a scale of 1 (worst) to 10 (best), are shown in the following table. The Herron managers give equal weights to the performance criteria. Which is the best alternative, as indicated by the preference matrix method? Rating Performance Criterion Product A Product B Product C 1. Demand uncertainty and project risk 3 9 2 2. Similarity to present products 7 8 6 3. Expected return on investment (ROI) 10 4 8 4. Compatibility with current manufacturing process 4 7 6 5. Competitive advantage 4 6 5
Non-financial performance indicators Identifying the critical success factors of a business is a key element in determining the non-financial performance indicators. Select an organization that you are familiar with, define the organization’s objectives, and identify two (2) critical success factors, and recommend one non-financial performance indicator, which must be measurable (expressed in a numerical formula). Note: the organization could be a business, a restaurant, a shop, a school club, as long as the organization’sobjectives are clear.
what are the pros and cons of the following five-point plan? 1. Each salesperson would continue to supervise company-owned stores and independent dealers. 2. Salespeople would be given specific objectives for facilities appearance and a percentage of sales of convenience store merchandise purchases from the Company’s designated distributors. 3. Salespeople would be given mandates that no retail outlet would remain closed for more than 30 days. 4. Sales volume objectives for salespeople would remain in place. Current year volume objectives would not change. 5. Regional sales managers’ annual objectives would be revised to be consistent with salespeople’s new objectives.
Table below is the cost breakdown per pound for typical big three cereal firms and private labels, which is constructed based on the Exhibit 2 and other information of RTE cereal case. Analysts believe that big three firms can drive private labels out of the market if big three lower their prices by 8 cents. What is the best recommendation of strategist to big three firms? Exhibit 2. Cost Breakdown per Pound for Typical Big Three Cereal Firms and Private Labels (a) Big three should lower their prices by 8 cents because it will increase their market share. (b) Big three should not lower their prices because it is too cruel to private labels. (c) Big three should consider if the profit when they drive private labels out of the market while lowering the price is greater than the profit when they let the private label in the market while keeping their prices. (d) None of the above. Explain each of the alternatives.
Kraft Bakeries introduced in 2019 a new line of frozen apple pie. For 2019, sales by quarter were asfollows: 11,000 units, 16,000 units, 15,000 units, and 20,000 units. Because of aggressive marketing and promotion, the company expects that sales for each quarter of 2020 will be 25% higher thanthe respective quarter in 2019. The selling price per unit in 2020 is expected to be $4. What are theexpected sales, in units and dollars, for the second quarter of 2020? For the third quarter of 2020?
Today’s Electronics specializes in manufacturing modern electronic components. It also builds the equipment that produces the components. Phyllis Weinberger, who is responsible for advising the president of Today’s Electronics on electronic manufacturing equipment, has developed the following table concerning a proposed facility: Payoffs Outcomes Large facility 550,000 -310,000 Medium-sized facility 300,000 -100,000 Small facility 200,000 -32,000 No facility 0 0 Develop an opportunity loss table. What is the minimax regret decision? Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.