
You’re called out of an investment committee meeting at your real estate company for an important phone call. Stepping back into the meeting you find you’ve missed the initial description of the Subject Property, but a heated debate on which Comparable Properties should be used to evaluate the property is underway.
Glancing at a handout your analysts have prepared, you see observe the following table:
|
Comp A |
Comp B |
Comp C |
Comp D |
Comp E |
Distance from Subject |
0.50 Miles |
0.75 miles |
1 mile |
0.25 miles |
0.90 miles |
Year of Construction |
1990 |
2005 |
1985 |
2015 |
2006 |
Sq. Ft. |
14,000 SF |
24,000 SF |
10,000 SF |
25,000 SF |
37,000 SF |
Months Since Sale |
3 months |
9 months |
12 months |
4 months |
2 months |
The group turns to you to break the tie. Based only on the information provided above, select the most prudent answer for you to give:
A. "They’re all close enough. Let’s just average the data from all of them.”
B. “Without knowing anything about the Subject Property, it’s impossible to say which of these comps would be most appropriate.”
C. “There's just too much variation among the comps provide a meaningful picture. We can’t make a decision without finding additional sales comps.”

Analysis of various descriptions on comparable properties:
Description | Analysis |
Distance from Subject | There is too much variation in distance from subject. No inference can be drawn based on distance. |
Year of Construction | Variation is too high. Oldest being in 1985( Comp C) and the latest being in 2015 (Comp D) |
Sq. Ft. | Variation is too high. Least area is 10,000 SF ( Comp C) and the largest area is 37,000 SF (Comp E) |
Months Since Sale | Variation is fairly high, spreading from 2 months to 1 year. Within that 1 -year, the market conditions might have changed. |
For evaluation of property using an analogy of the given descriptions, such an analogy must help in drawing an inference and based upon such inference an acceptable conclusion must be drawn out.
Step by stepSolved in 3 steps

- a buyer purchased a home using a va loan. an appraiser was assigned to estimate the value of the property for the lender. the appraised value was less than the contract price. if the buyer really wants the property which of the following choices is the buyers best option do nothing because the seller must sell the property at the appraised value Hire an appraiser and see if a second appraisal yields a higher appraised value seek an fha lender who will automatically make up the difference between the contract price and the appraised value make up the difference between the contract price and appraised value in casharrow_forwardUse the following information to answer questions 1 to 5. A development corporation purchased land that will be the site of a new luxury condominium complex. Management is considering a six month market research study designed to learn more about potential market acceptance of the condominium project. Management anticipates that, if conducted, the market research study will provide one of the following two results. 1. Favorable report (F): A significant number of the individuals contacted express interest in purchasing a condominium. 2. Unfavorable report (U): Very few of the individuals contacted express interest in purchasing a condo- minium. After deciding whether to conduct the market research study, they have the following two decision alternatives. d1 = a small complex with 30 condominiumsd2 = a medium complex with 60 condominiumsFollowing this, a chance event concerning the demand for the condominiums has two states of nature. s1 = strong demand for the condominiumss2 = weak…arrow_forwardPlease do not give solution in image format thankuarrow_forward
- You’re called out of an investment committee meeting at your real estate company for an important phone call. Stepping back into the meeting you find you’ve missed the initial description of the Subject Property, but a heated debate on which Comparable Properties should be used to evaluate the property is underway. Glancing at a handout your analysts have prepared, you see observe the following table: Comp A Comp B Comp C Comp D Comp E Distance from Subject 0.50 Miles 0.75 miles 1 mile 0.25 miles 0.90 miles Year of Construction 1990 2005 1985 2015 2006 Sq. Ft. 14,000 SF 24,000 SF 10,000 SF 25,000 SF 37,000 SF Months Since Sale 3 months 9 months 12 months 4 months 2 monthsarrow_forwardhelp please answer in text form with proper workings and explanation for each and every part and steps with concept and introduction no AI no copy paste remember answer must be in proper format with all workingarrow_forwardThe first step in the development process is to gain control of the site. What is the most common, and lowest risk, method to obtain control of a site from another owner? O By purchasing directly from the existing owner By negotiating an option to purchase from the existing owner O By purchasing land at auction from the city O By borrowing money from a construction lenderarrow_forward
- We will continue our discussion from Module 6 on depreciation. Please read the article: Bumblauskas, D., Igou, A, Bumblauskas, P., Vaske, B., & Hahn, K. (2021). The Fixed Asset Life Cycle ChallengeLinks to an external site.. SF Magazine.com. Select ONE talking point from the article that you found interesting. Support your position by stating why you believe your point is relevant to accounting for depreciation.arrow_forwardUse the information provided to answer the questions.Use the information provided below to calculate the following. Where applicable, use the presentvalue tables provided in APPENDICES 1 and 2 that appear after QUESTION 5. QUESTION) Calculate the Accounting Rate of Return (on average investment) of Project B (expressed to twodecimal places). INFORMATION Zeda Enterprises has the option to invest in machinery in projects A and B but finance is only available to invest inone of them. You are given the following projected data:Project A Project BInitial cost R300 000 R300 000Scrap value R40 000 0Depreciation per year R52 000 R60 000Net profitYear 1 R20 000Year 2 R30 000Year 3 R50 000Year 4 R60 000Year 5 R10 000Net cash flowsYear 1 R90 000Year 2 R90 000Year 3 R90 000Year 4 R90 000Year 5 R90 000 Additional informationThe discount rate used by the company is 12%. Transcribed Image Text:Number of Periods 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 m 10 11 12 13 14 15 1% 2% 0.9901 0.9804 0.9709 3% 3.9020 3.8077…arrow_forwardPlease do fast ASAParrow_forward
- Essentials Of InvestmentsFinanceISBN:9781260013924Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.Publisher:Mcgraw-hill Education,
- Foundations Of FinanceFinanceISBN:9780134897264Author:KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. WilliamPublisher:Pearson,Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou...FinanceISBN:9781337395250Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. HoustonPublisher:Cengage LearningCorporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i...FinanceISBN:9780077861759Author:Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan ProfessorPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





