Check Your Understanding Is the equation
One further point thin needs to be mentioned is the effect of the operations of calculus on dimensions. We have seen that dimensions obey the rules of algebra, just like units, but what happens when we take the derivative of one physical quantity with respect to another or integrate a physical quantity over another? The derivative of a function is just the slope of the line tangent to its graph and slopes are ratios, so for physical quantities
Similarly, since integrals are just sums of products, the dimension of the integral of
By the same reasoning, analogous rules hold for the units of physical quantities derived from other quantities by integration or differentiation.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 1 Solutions
University Physics Volume 1
Additional Science Textbook Solutions
College Physics (10th Edition)
Physics for Scientists and Engineers: A Strategic Approach with Modern Physics (4th Edition)
Introduction to Electrodynamics
College Physics
College Physics: A Strategic Approach (4th Edition)
Essential University Physics: Volume 1 (3rd Edition)
- Consider the physical quantities s,v,a, and t with dimensions [s]=L,[v]=LT1,[a]=LT2 and [t]=L . Determine whether each of the following equations is dimensionally consistent. (a)v2=2as;(b)s=vt2+0.5at2;(c)v=s/t;(d)a=v/tarrow_forwardThe purpose of this problem is to show the entire concept of dimensional consistency can be summarized but the old saying “You can’t add apples and oranges.” It you have studied power series expansions in a calculus course, you know the standard mathematical funstions such as trigonometric functions, logarithms, and exponential function can be expressed as infinite sums of the form where the an are dimensionless constants for all n = 0, 1, 2, … and x is the argument of the function. (If you have not studied power series in calculus yet, just trust us.) Use this fact to explain why the requirement that all terms in an equation have the same dimensions is sufficient as a definition of dimensional consistency. That is, it actually implies the arguments of standard mathematical funstions must be dimensional consistency. That is, it actually implies the arguments of standard mathematical functions must be dimensionless, so it is not really necessary to make this latter condition a separate requirement of the definition of dimensional consistency as we have done in this section.arrow_forwardConsider the equation 4000/400=10.0 . Assuming the number of significant figures in the answer is correct, what can you say about the number of significant figures In 4000 and 400?arrow_forward
- In general, when a derived unit becomes complicated (involves too many standard units), what is done?arrow_forwardIn SI units, speeds are measured in meters per second (m/s). But, depending on where you live, you’re probably mole comfortable of thinking of speeds in terms of either kilometers per hour (km/h) or miles per hour (mi/h). In this problem, you will see that 1 m/s is roughly 4 km/h or 2 mi/h, which is handy to use when developing your physical Intuition. More precisely, show that (a) 1.0m/s=3.6km/h and 1.0m/s=2.2mi/h .arrow_forwardConsider the equation y=mt+b, where the dimension of y is length and the dimension of t is time, and mand bare constants. What are the dimensions and SI units of (a) mand (b) b ?arrow_forward
- Roughly how many heartbeats are there in a lifetime?arrow_forwardA good-quality measuring tape can be off by 0.50cm over a distance of 20m . What is its percent uncertainty?arrow_forwardCheck Your Understanding Light navels about 9 Pm in a year. Given that a year is about 3107s , what is the speed of light in meters per second?arrow_forward
- Consider the physical quantities m,s,v,a, and t with dimensions [m]=M,[s]=L,[v]=LT1 and [a]=LT2 . Assuming each of the following equations is dimensionally consistent, find the dimension of the quantity on the left-hand side of the equation: (a)F=ma;(b)K=0.5mv2;(c)p=mv;(d)W=mas;(e)L=mvrarrow_forwardCheck Your Understanding Figure 1.4 says the mass of the atmosphere is 1019kg . Assuming the density of the atmosphere is 1kg/m3 , estimate the height of Earth’s atmosphere. Do you think your answer is an underestimate or an overestimate? Explain why. How many piano tuners are there in New York City? How many leaves are on that tree? If you are studying photosynthesis or thinking of writing a smartphone app tot piano tuners, then the answers to these questions might be of great interest to you. Otherwise, you probably couldn’t care less what the answers are. However, these are exactly the soils of estimation problems that people in various tech industries have been asking potential employees to evaluate their quantitative reasoning skills. If building physical intuition and evaluating quantitative claims do not seem like sufficient reasons tot you to practice estimation problems, how about the fact that being good at them just might land you a high-paying job? For practice estimating relative lengths, areas, and volumes, check out this PhET (https://openstaxcollege.org/l/21lengthgame) simulation, titled “Estimation.”arrow_forwardA popular saying is Give him an inch, and hell take a mile. What would be the equivalent saying using comparable metric units?arrow_forward
- University Physics Volume 1PhysicsISBN:9781938168277Author:William Moebs, Samuel J. Ling, Jeff SannyPublisher:OpenStax - Rice UniversityStars and GalaxiesPhysicsISBN:9781305120785Author:Michael A. Seeds, Dana BackmanPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Physics: A Calculus-Based TextPhysicsISBN:9781133104261Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage Learning
- An Introduction to Physical SciencePhysicsISBN:9781305079137Author:James Shipman, Jerry D. Wilson, Charles A. Higgins, Omar TorresPublisher:Cengage Learning