If managers can improve efficiency and effectiveness simultaneously, with the reference to the safety recall at General Motors for defective ignition systems. Introduction: The start of this entire dilemma transpired on the 10 t h of March 2010, where an accident occurred by a woman driving a 2005 Chevy Cobalt; the driver had lost control of the car and skidded over the road and fell over 15 feet down into a creek., which led to the passing of the driver. This accident led to police investigations and escalated into law suits placed against GM Motors by several citizens.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 1, Problem 4DQ

Summary Introduction

To determine:

If managers can improve efficiency and effectiveness simultaneously, with the reference to the safety recall at General Motors for defective ignition systems.

Introduction:

The start of this entire dilemma transpired on the 10^t^h of March 2010, where an accident occurred by a woman driving a 2005 Chevy Cobalt; the driver had lost control of the car and skidded over the road and fell over 15 feet down into a creek., which led to the passing of the driver. This accident led to police investigations and escalated into law suits placed against GM Motors by several citizens.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Think about the highly publicized safety recall at General Motors (GM ) for defective ignition systems. One observer said that a goal of efficiency had taken precedence over a goal of quality within this company. Do you think managers can improve both efficiency and effec tiveness şimultaneously? Discuss.

Discuss whether a manager can use tools and techniques from several different traditional and contemporary management perspectives at the same time. For example, explain if a manager can use both classical and behavioral perspectives. Give an example of a time or situation when a manager can do this, and describe how it can enable him or her to be effective.

Douglas McGregor believed there were two types of managers: Theory X managers, who assume that workers dislike work, lack ambition, and require constant supervision; and Theory Y managers, who assume that employees enjoy work, are self-directed, and seek responsibility. In what situations would a Theory X manager be more effective? In what situations would a Theory Y manager be more effective? What experiences have you had in the workplace or in school that support your assertions? Have you had a boss or professor that leaned toward either Theory X or Y?