Whether managers can improve upon effectiveness and efficiency should be determined. Consider GM situation for defect in the ignition system wherein it has come to the picture that efficiency goal is preceded by quality goals in the organization. Introduction: Organization effectiveness stands to be the degree pertaining to which a stated goal is being achieved by the organization. Organization's efficiency on the other hand reflects the amount of resources that are taken in consideration of attaining the goal of the organization. It relies upon the number of people, the amount of money and raw material required to manufacture a specific level of output. The key obligation of the manager is to ascertain great performance, which stands to be the ability of the organization to achieve its goals by making use of resources in an effective and efficient manner. Although effectiveness and efficiency stand vital for performance, most of the individual would most likely say that effectiveness tends to have more significance rather than efficiency. The reason behind such statement is that no value is being provided to the internal efficiency if it fails to make possible for organizations to respond to external environment or achieve its goals. Whereas an organization that stands to be effective does attain its objective or goals as per the definition.

Question

Think about the highly publicized safety recall at General Motors (GM ) for defective ignition systems. One observer said that a goal of efficiency had taken precedence over a goal of quality within this company. Do you think managers can improve both efficiency and effec tiveness şimultaneously? Discuss.

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 1, Problem 5DQ

Summary Introduction

To determine:

Whether managers can improve upon effectiveness and efficiency should be determined. Consider GM situation for defect in the ignition system wherein it has come to the picture that efficiency goal is preceded by quality goals in the organization.

Introduction:

Organization effectiveness stands to be the degree pertaining to which a stated goal is being achieved by the organization. Organization's efficiency on the other hand reflects the amount of resources that are taken in consideration of attaining the goal of the organization. It relies upon the number of people, the amount of money and raw material required to manufacture a specific level of output. The key obligation of the manager is to ascertain great performance, which stands to be the ability of the organization to achieve its goals by making use of resources in an effective and efficient manner.

Although effectiveness and efficiency stand vital for performance, most of the individual would most likely say that effectiveness tends to have more significance rather than efficiency. The reason behind such statement is that no value is being provided to the internal efficiency if it fails to make possible for organizations to respond to external environment or achieve its goals. Whereas an organization that stands to be effective does attain its objective or goals as per the definition.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Think about the highly publicized safety recall at General Motors (GM ) for defective ignition systems. One observer said that a goal of efficiency had taken precedence over a goal of quality within this company. Do you think managers can improve both efficiency and effec tiveness şimultaneously? Discuss.

Discuss whether a manager can use tools and techniques from several different traditional and contemporary management perspectives at the same time. For example, explain if a manager can use both classical and behavioral perspectives. Give an example of a time or situation when a manager can do this, and describe how it can enable him or her to be effective.

Douglas McGregor believed there were two types of managers: Theory X managers, who assume that workers dislike work, lack ambition, and require constant supervision; and Theory Y managers, who assume that employees enjoy work, are self-directed, and seek responsibility. In what situations would a Theory X manager be more effective? In what situations would a Theory Y manager be more effective? What experiences have you had in the workplace or in school that support your assertions? Have you had a boss or professor that leaned toward either Theory X or Y?