The people D, S, B and a teenage boy were casted away in the sea on a lifeboat due to a storm. The only means of sustenance they had was two pounds of turnip which eventually got finished. So, D proposed to sacrifice one of the four persons on the boat for further sustenance, to which S agreed but B disagreed. The boy was ignored. The following day, D killed the boy who had become quite weak, and all three fed on him for survival until they were saved four days later by an ongoing boat. After being rescued, they were put to trial for the murder of the boy in England. To Explain: The possibility of three survivors to be subjected to penalties as per English criminal law given their unique circumstances.

Question

Olga, a resident of Maine, was recently injured by a defective product produced by Home Appliance Corporation, which is incorporated in Delaware but has its company headquarters in Virgina. Olga purchased the defective product in Maine. Olga is suing Home Appliance for $60,000. Which courts would have personal jurisdiction in this case? Would a federal court have jurisdiction? Why or why not?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 1, Problem 6BCP

Summary Introduction

Case Summary: The people D, S, B and a teenage boy were casted away in the sea on a lifeboat due to a storm. The only means of sustenance they had was two pounds of turnip which eventually got finished. So, D proposed to sacrifice one of the four persons on the boat for further sustenance, to which S agreed but B disagreed. The boy was ignored. The following day, D killed the boy who had become quite weak, and all three fed on him for survival until they were saved four days later by an ongoing boat. After being rescued, they were put to trial for the murder of the boy in England.

To Explain: The possibility of three survivors to be subjected to penalties as per English criminal law given their unique circumstances.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Olga, a resident of Maine, was recently injured by a defective product produced by Home Appliance Corporation, which is incorporated in Delaware but has its company headquarters in Virgina. Olga purchased the defective product in Maine. Olga is suing Home Appliance for $60,000. Which courts would have personal jurisdiction in this case? Would a federal court have jurisdiction? Why or why not?

Akhil drives a taxi without a license. Unaware of this, some passengers hired his services. Unfortunately, the taxi collides against a lorry, which is parked by the side of the road and the passengers get injured. In view of this illustration, discuss the following:Questions:A. Whether Akhil is guilty of breach of duty. Identify the nature of his act.B. Meaning and nature of a Tort.

A statute requiring railroads to fence their tracks is construed as intended solely to prevent animals that stray onto the right-of-way from being hit by trains. B&A Railroad Company fails to fence its tracks. Two of Calvin’s cows wander onto the track. Nellie is hit by a train. Elsie is poisoned by weeds growing beside the track. For which cow(s), if any, is B&A Railroad Company liable to Calvin? Why?