Microeconomics
2nd Edition
ISBN: 9781259813337
Author: KARLAN, Dean S., Morduch, Jonathan
Publisher: Mcgraw-hill Education,
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 1, Problem 7PA
To determine
(a)
To ascertain whether the
To determine
(b)
To ascertain whether the opportunity cost is increasing or decreasing.
To determine
(c)
To ascertain whether the opportunity cost is increasing or decreasing.
To determine
(d)
To ascertain whether the opportunity cost is increasing or decreasing.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Consider a two-city (A and B) regional economy where each city operates on the negatively sloped portion of its utility curve. In the initial equilibrium, the two cities are identical. Then air pollution (lead emissions) in city B decreases the brain power and productivity of workers in the city by 20 percent. Illustrate the effects of lead emissions on the regional equilibrium, indicating the direction of changes in city size (the number of workers) and regional utility.
Because one’s productivity in the workplace is likely to be affected by one’s health, investment in health could increase earnings to the extent that one might spend money on health care without reducing his or her consumption of other goods.
Consider the production of handmade rugs and assembly robots in India and Canada. Assume that Canada is relatively abundant in capital and that India is relative abundant in labour. Furthermore assume that the production technology for rugs and robots is the same in both countries.
Draw production possibilities frontiers for each country keeping the production of rugs in the horizontal axis and the production of robots in the vertical axis. Assuming that consumer preferences are the same in both countries, add indifference curves and relative price lines under autarky. What are the differences in the relative price of rugs between the countries under autarky?
Chapter 1 Solutions
Microeconomics
Ch. 1 - Prob. 1RQCh. 1 - Prob. 2RQCh. 1 - Prob. 3RQCh. 1 - Prob. 4RQCh. 1 - Prob. 5RQCh. 1 - Prob. 6RQCh. 1 - Prob. 7RQCh. 1 - Prob. 8RQCh. 1 - Prob. 9RQCh. 1 - Prob. 10RQ
Ch. 1 - Prob. 11RQCh. 1 - Prob. 12RQCh. 1 - Prob. 13RQCh. 1 - Prob. 14RQCh. 1 - Prob. 15RQCh. 1 - Prob. 16RQCh. 1 - Prob. 17RQCh. 1 - Prob. 18RQCh. 1 - Prob. 19RQCh. 1 - Prob. 20RQCh. 1 - Prob. 21RQCh. 1 - Prob. 22RQCh. 1 - Prob. 23RQCh. 1 - Prob. 24RQCh. 1 - Prob. 1PACh. 1 - Prob. 2PACh. 1 - Prob. 3PACh. 1 - Prob. 4PACh. 1 - Prob. 5PACh. 1 - Prob. 6PACh. 1 - Prob. 7PACh. 1 - Prob. 8PACh. 1 - Prob. 9PACh. 1 - Prob. 10PACh. 1 - Prob. 11PACh. 1 - Prob. 12PACh. 1 - Prob. 13PACh. 1 - Prob. 14PACh. 1 - Prob. 15PA
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Q1: Match each diagram in Figure 1 with its description here.Assume that the economy is producing or attempting to produce at point A and that most members of society like meat and not fish. Some descriptions apply to more than one diagram, and some diagrams have more than one description. Inefficient production of meat and fish Productive efficiency An inefficient mix of output Technological advances in the production of meat and fish The law of increasing opportunity cost An impossible combination of meat and fisharrow_forwardBecause one’s productivity in the workplace is likely to be affected by one’s health, investment in health could increase earnings to the extent that one might spend money on health care without reducing his or her consumption of other goods. True or Falsearrow_forwardSuppose that the price of commodity Y is $2 per unit while the price of commodity X is $4 per unit and suppose that an individual’s money income is $100 per time period and is all spent on X and Y. Draw the budget constraint line for this consumer at the initial point. 2.If the price of Y decreases to $3, incorporate BL2 showing change in the Budget line.arrow_forward
- Suppose that each week Fiona buys 16 peaches and 4 apples at her local farmer's market. Both kinds of fruit cost $1 each. From this we can infer that: If Fiona is maximizing her utility, then her marginal utility from the 16th peach she buys must be greater than her marginal utility from the 4th apple she buys. Fiona is not maximizing her utility. If Fiona is maximizing her utility, then her marginal utility from the 16th peach she buys must be equal to her marginal utility from the 4th apple she buys. The law of diminishing marginal utility does not hold for Fiona.arrow_forwardThe Brady family have a weekly budget of €200 to be spent on Food (F) and Other Goods (OG), which are initially equally priced at €10 and €20 per unit, respectively. Given recent inflation, the government has concerns about the ability of large families to afford an adequate diet for children. Due to this, the government announces that when Food consumption exceeds 12 units, the government will subsidise food consumption so that the price per subsequent unit will be €5 for any family. With Food on the horizontal axis, show the family’s pre and post-scheme budget line. Can we definitively determine the family’s utility maximising consumption bundle as a result of the government scheme?arrow_forwardwhile this topic may seem insensitive given the recent events in Uvalde (and others), in economics the "Guns vs. Butter" debate has been used for decades to describe the choice and trade-offs between producing a governmental capital goods (guns) vs. personal consumer goods (butter) in society. Please keep this in mind and do not get off topic in the guns vs. no guns debate or the idea of gun legislation. In this exercise you will demonstrate your ability to draw a simple production possibilities curve given data on the quantity of one input (labor) and the amount of labor required to produce each of two outputs (guns and butter). You should also be able to identify the opportunity cost of one good in terms of the other as the slope of the PPC. You will go on to explain your analysis. Guns or Butter? Suppose a nation has a total of 24 units of labor, which can be used to produce either guns or butter. One gun takes 6 units of labor to produce and 1 butter takes 2 units of labor to…arrow_forward
- Consider a couple (a husband and a wife) that jointly represents their collective preferences between combinations of household production time (X) and purchased goods and services (Y) according to the formula W = X2Y, where W represents the level of welfare. Suppose the maximum time available in a day is 16 hours and currently the wife devotes 6 hours to market work (H) at a wage of $16 per hour. a. What is the level of welfare associated with the wife’s current situation? b. How much additional purchasing power would the wife contribute if her market work hours increased to 8? c. How much of an increase in purchased goods and services would be necessary to compensate for the additional 2 hours of lost household production? d. Should this couple choose to have the wife increase her market work by 2 hours? e. If this couple is raising a child, suppose that combinations of household production and purchased goods are now ranked according to the formula U = X3Y. Would the additional 2…arrow_forwardOptions: 1. A) Yes, you can still afford the bundle at your previous consumer equilibrium B) No, you now cannot afford the bundle at your previous consumer equilibrium C) It is uncertain whether or not you can still afford the bundle at your previous consumer equilibrium 2. A) For each peck of apples, you will buy 1/3 pounds of oranges B)For each peck of apples, you will buy 1 pounds of oranges C)For each peck of apples, you will buy 3 pounds of oranges D) For each peck of apples, you will buy 6 pounds of orangesarrow_forwardAssume you are spending your full budget and purchasing such amounts of X and Y that the marginal utility from the last units consumed is 40 and 20 utils respectively. Assume (a) the prices of X and Y are $8 and $4 respectively; (b) it takes 3 hours to consume a unit of X and 1 hour to consume a unit of Y; and (c) your time is worth $2 per hour. In equilibrium, if you included the opportunity cost of time then, you should substitute X for Y until the marginal utility per hour is the same for both products. should consume X and Y in the equal amounts. should consume less of Y and more of X. should consume less of X and more of Y.arrow_forward
- How would you demonstrate part b) diagramatically 6. Assume you can work as many hours you wish at £12 per hour (net of tax). If you do not work, you have no income. You have no ability to borrow or lend, so your consumption, c, is simply equal to your income. a) Derive and plot the feasible set, between daily values of consumption c, and “leisure”, l. Label the values at the intercepts (the points where the feasible frontier cuts the two axes). b) Assume that your optimal choice of consumption and leisure is to work 8 hours per day. Illustrate this choice diagrammatically using the feasible set and indifference curves.arrow_forwardQuestion 26 Please refer to Maxine's & Daisy's PPFs Which good should Daisy specialize in? Group of answer choices the good for which she has a higher opportunity cost the good she can produce the most of the good for which she has a lower opportunity cost the good for which she has an absolute advantage.arrow_forward. Jenna and Walter are on a road trip across the country. They both say that they get 25 utils from peanut butter sandwiches and 25 utils from trail mix. Knowing this, we can conclude that Jenna a. gets the same satisfaction from peanut butter sandwiches that Walter does. b. gets more satisfaction from trail mix than Walter does. c. gets more satisfaction from trail mix than from peanut butter sandwiches. d. and Walter are both indifferent between other food than peanut butter sandwiches or trail mix. e. and Walter will consume the same amount of peanut butter sandwiches and trail mix on the road trip.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
