Terminology* Match each of the following terms to one of the definitions or descriptions listed below: sensitivity analysis, scenario analysis, break-even analysis, operating leverage, Monte Carlo simulation, decision tree, real option, tornado diagram.
- a. Recalculation of project
NPV by changing several inputs to new but consistent values. - b. Opportunity to modify a project at a future date.
- c. Analysis of how project NPV changes if different assumptions are made about sales, costs, and other key variables.
- d. The degree to which fixed costs magnify the effect on profits of a shortfall in sales.
- e. A graphical technique for displaying possible future events and decisions taken in response to those events.
- f. A graphical technique that is often used to display the results of a sensitivity analysis.
- g. Determination of the level of future sales at which project profitability or NPV equals zero.
- h. Method for calculating the probability distribution of possible outcomes.
To match: The terms with its appropriate definitions.
Explanation of Solution
a) The computation of the NPV of the project by changing various inputs to a consistent and a new values.
Hence, the correct answer is scenario analysis.
b) The chance to change the project on a future date.
Hence, the correct answer is real option.
c) The evaluation of how the NPV of the project changes if varied assumptions are made for costs, sales and any other fundamental variables.
Hence, the correct answer is sensitivity analysis.
d) The extent to which the fixed costs expands the outcome on profits for a shortfall in the sales.
Hence, the correct answer is operating leverage.
e) The graphical method for viewing a possible upcoming decisions and events taken in response for those activities.
Hence, the correct answer is decision tree.
f) A graphical method, which is usually utilized to view the outcome of sensitivity analysis.
Hence, the correct answer is tornado diagram.
g) Identification of the future sales level at which the profitability or NPV of the project is equivalent to zero.
Hence, the correct answer is break-even analysis.
h) The technique of computing the probability distribution of possible results.
Hence, the correct answer is Monte Carlo simulation.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 10 Solutions
PRIN.OF CORPORATE FINANCE
- Good managers not only identify and evaluate realoptions in projects—they also structure projects soas to create real options. Suppose a company isconsidering a project to build an electric generating plant. Name some real options that might bebuilt into the project, explain how they could beevaluated, and discuss their effects on the project’sNPV.arrow_forwarda. Acronym TELOS: which provides guidance for accessing project feasibility. The term stands for technical, economic, legal, operational and schedules feasibility. Discuss these feasibilities briefly. And elaborate cost-benefit analysis under economic feasibility. b) Accountants should be involved in the detailed design and implementation of the systemdevelopment life cycle. Comment on the statementarrow_forwardCompare and contrast different project evaluation methods, including net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), and payback period. When is each method most suitable for project analysis?arrow_forward
- The analysis of the effect that a single variable has on the net present value of a project is called _____ analysis. Group of answer choices variable erosion sensitivity scenario cost-benefitarrow_forwarddiscusses the acronym TELOS which providesguidance for accessing project feasibility. The term stands for technical, economic, legal,operational and schedules feasibility. Discuss these feasibilities briefly. And elaboratecost-benefit analysis under economic feasibilityarrow_forwardBriefly review the sensitivity analysis that is presented in the case exhibits. Under what circumstances is this project financially attractive? What bets were the company making when they went ahead with the project? DO NOT HAVE TO PERFORM YOUR OWN SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS. YOU ARE TO INTERPRET THE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS THAT IS GIVEN.arrow_forward
- a) Calculate the net present value (NPV) of each project, assess its acceptability, and indicate which project is best using NPV.arrow_forwardComparing Investment Criteria. Define each of the following investment rules and discuss any potential shortcomings of each. In your definition, state the criterion for accepting or rejecting independent projects under each rule. a. Payback period. b. Internal rate of return. c. Profitability index. d. Net present value.arrow_forwardAnswer the two questions below:a) What is the purpose of a project risk analysis, and why is it important in investment decision making?b) What is the difference between accounting break-even and NPV break-even? Which will offer the higher break-even level of output, and why?arrow_forward
- discusses the acronym TELOS which provides guidance for accessing project feasibility. The term stands for technical, economic, legal, operational and schedules feasibility. Discuss these feasibilities briefly. And elaborate cost-benefit analysis under economic feasibility. b) Accountants should be involved in the detailed design and implementation of the system development life cycle. Comment on the statement.arrow_forwardWhich of the following statements is CORRECT? a. An NPV profile graph shows how a project's payback varies as the cost of capital changes. b. The NPV profile graph for a normal project will generally have a positive (upward) slope as the life of the project increases. c. An NPV profile graph is designed to give decision makers an idea about how a project's risk varies with its life. d. An NPV profile graph is designed to give decision makers an idea about how a project's contribution to the firm's value varies with the cost of capital. e. We cannot draw a project's NPV profile unless we know the appropriate WACC for use in evaluating the project's NPV. Provide explanation for the choicearrow_forwardAutomotive art Net Present Valueo N/A • Return on Investment (ROI) • Anticipated Benefits from the Deployment of the New System • Project Risk and Feasibility of the Project • Organizational Risks and Feasibility • Evaluate Technological Risks and Feasibility • Assess Resource Risks and Feasibility • Identify Schedule Risks and Feasibility • Client Review and Approval • Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)arrow_forward
- Essentials Of InvestmentsFinanceISBN:9781260013924Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.Publisher:Mcgraw-hill Education,
- Foundations Of FinanceFinanceISBN:9780134897264Author:KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. WilliamPublisher:Pearson,Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou...FinanceISBN:9781337395250Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. HoustonPublisher:Cengage LearningCorporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i...FinanceISBN:9780077861759Author:Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan ProfessorPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education