To think critically about: The union shop agreements as the violation of freedom of choice at workplace and examine if the agreements unfairly penalize workers that pay dues to the unions they elected. Introduction: The agreement as per which the non-members of the union can only be hired for a fixed period of 30days and the further employment depends upon the membership in the union is referred to as the union shop agreement.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 12, Problem 1CT

Summary Introduction

To think critically about: The union shop agreements as the violation of freedom of choice at workplace and examine if the agreements unfairly penalize workers that pay dues to the unions they elected.

Introduction:

The agreement as per which the non-members of the union can only be hired for a fixed period of 30days and the further employment depends upon the membership in the union is referred to as the union shop agreement.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The freedom of choice seems to be violated by the union shop agreements as the workers if hired are obliged to become the member of the union. In case, the workers do not wish to become a member, the same fees or dues are applicable to all. As, the employment opportunity are a few, this becomes a case of sheer blackmail to pay the unwanted dues. The workers can neglect the association with such unions to get saved from an agreement situation.

The dues that are paid by the workers as per the union shop agreement if known as to where is it spend or its usage is defined by the union cannot be defined as unfair. If the option to join the union is in the hand of worker and the expenditure of fairs are fairly discussed, the workers will not be addressed as unfairly penalized.

Conclusion

Therefore, it can be concluded that the freedom of the workers is violated in a union shop agreement and the workers are not unfairly penalized if the dues are paid intentionally.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

Pay and equity concerns are often potential areas of disagreement between employers and trade unions during wage negotiations. (a) Explain the main issues and concerns for the employer. (b) Explain the main issues and concerns for the employees and their trade union (c) What do you suggest as an appropriate approach in resolving the issues among the parties involved?

1. "An employer might not want to stifle a union-organizing effort. In fact, an employer might want to encourage his employees to join a union." Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Explain your position. 2. Given your career aspirations, might you join a union? Why or why not? Explain.

Federal laws dating back to the 1960s protect employees and job applicants from discrimination based on a variety of characteristics, including race and sex. Evidenced by the thousands of claims filed each year with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the existence of these laws has not eliminated discrimination in the workplace. Despite laws prohibiting discrimination, why does it still exist? Are the laws prohibiting discrimination and the consequences for violating them appropriate for the current era? What can be done to eliminate workplace discrimination?

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 12, Problem 1CT

Summary Introduction

To think critically about: The union shop agreements as the violation of freedom of choice at workplace and examine if the agreements unfairly penalize workers that pay dues to the unions they elected.

Introduction:

The agreement as per which the non-members of the union can only be hired for a fixed period of 30days and the further employment depends upon the membership in the union is referred to as the union shop agreement.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The freedom of choice seems to be violated by the union shop agreements as the workers if hired are obliged to become the member of the union. In case, the workers do not wish to become a member, the same fees or dues are applicable to all. As, the employment opportunity are a few, this becomes a case of sheer blackmail to pay the unwanted dues. The workers can neglect the association with such unions to get saved from an agreement situation.

The dues that are paid by the workers as per the union shop agreement if known as to where is it spend or its usage is defined by the union cannot be defined as unfair. If the option to join the union is in the hand of worker and the expenditure of fairs are fairly discussed, the workers will not be addressed as unfairly penalized.

Conclusion

Therefore, it can be concluded that the freedom of the workers is violated in a union shop agreement and the workers are not unfairly penalized if the dues are paid intentionally.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 12, Problem 1CT

Summary Introduction

To think critically about: The union shop agreements as the violation of freedom of choice at workplace and examine if the agreements unfairly penalize workers that pay dues to the unions they elected.

Introduction:

The agreement as per which the non-members of the union can only be hired for a fixed period of 30days and the further employment depends upon the membership in the union is referred to as the union shop agreement.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The freedom of choice seems to be violated by the union shop agreements as the workers if hired are obliged to become the member of the union. In case, the workers do not wish to become a member, the same fees or dues are applicable to all. As, the employment opportunity are a few, this becomes a case of sheer blackmail to pay the unwanted dues. The workers can neglect the association with such unions to get saved from an agreement situation.

The dues that are paid by the workers as per the union shop agreement if known as to where is it spend or its usage is defined by the union cannot be defined as unfair. If the option to join the union is in the hand of worker and the expenditure of fairs are fairly discussed, the workers will not be addressed as unfairly penalized.

Conclusion

Therefore, it can be concluded that the freedom of the workers is violated in a union shop agreement and the workers are not unfairly penalized if the dues are paid intentionally.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 12, Problem 1CT

Summary Introduction

To think critically about: The union shop agreements as the violation of freedom of choice at workplace and examine if the agreements unfairly penalize workers that pay dues to the unions they elected.

Introduction:

The agreement as per which the non-members of the union can only be hired for a fixed period of 30days and the further employment depends upon the membership in the union is referred to as the union shop agreement.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The freedom of choice seems to be violated by the union shop agreements as the workers if hired are obliged to become the member of the union. In case, the workers do not wish to become a member, the same fees or dues are applicable to all. As, the employment opportunity are a few, this becomes a case of sheer blackmail to pay the unwanted dues. The workers can neglect the association with such unions to get saved from an agreement situation.

The dues that are paid by the workers as per the union shop agreement if known as to where is it spend or its usage is defined by the union cannot be defined as unfair. If the option to join the union is in the hand of worker and the expenditure of fairs are fairly discussed, the workers will not be addressed as unfairly penalized.

Conclusion

Therefore, it can be concluded that the freedom of the workers is violated in a union shop agreement and the workers are not unfairly penalized if the dues are paid intentionally.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 12, Problem 1CT

Summary Introduction

To think critically about: The union shop agreements as the violation of freedom of choice at workplace and examine if the agreements unfairly penalize workers that pay dues to the unions they elected.

Introduction:

The agreement as per which the non-members of the union can only be hired for a fixed period of 30days and the further employment depends upon the membership in the union is referred to as the union shop agreement.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The freedom of choice seems to be violated by the union shop agreements as the workers if hired are obliged to become the member of the union. In case, the workers do not wish to become a member, the same fees or dues are applicable to all. As, the employment opportunity are a few, this becomes a case of sheer blackmail to pay the unwanted dues. The workers can neglect the association with such unions to get saved from an agreement situation.

The dues that are paid by the workers as per the union shop agreement if known as to where is it spend or its usage is defined by the union cannot be defined as unfair. If the option to join the union is in the hand of worker and the expenditure of fairs are fairly discussed, the workers will not be addressed as unfairly penalized.

Conclusion

Therefore, it can be concluded that the freedom of the workers is violated in a union shop agreement and the workers are not unfairly penalized if the dues are paid intentionally.

Answer 6

Chapter 12, Problem 1CT

Summary Introduction

To think critically about: The union shop agreements as the violation of freedom of choice at workplace and examine if the agreements unfairly penalize workers that pay dues to the unions they elected.

Introduction:

The agreement as per which the non-members of the union can only be hired for a fixed period of 30days and the further employment depends upon the membership in the union is referred to as the union shop agreement.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The freedom of choice seems to be violated by the union shop agreements as the workers if hired are obliged to become the member of the union. In case, the workers do not wish to become a member, the same fees or dues are applicable to all. As, the employment opportunity are a few, this becomes a case of sheer blackmail to pay the unwanted dues. The workers can neglect the association with such unions to get saved from an agreement situation.

The dues that are paid by the workers as per the union shop agreement if known as to where is it spend or its usage is defined by the union cannot be defined as unfair. If the option to join the union is in the hand of worker and the expenditure of fairs are fairly discussed, the workers will not be addressed as unfairly penalized.

Conclusion

Therefore, it can be concluded that the freedom of the workers is violated in a union shop agreement and the workers are not unfairly penalized if the dues are paid intentionally.

Answer 7

Chapter 12, Problem 1CT

Summary Introduction

To think critically about: The union shop agreements as the violation of freedom of choice at workplace and examine if the agreements unfairly penalize workers that pay dues to the unions they elected.

Introduction:

The agreement as per which the non-members of the union can only be hired for a fixed period of 30days and the further employment depends upon the membership in the union is referred to as the union shop agreement.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The freedom of choice seems to be violated by the union shop agreements as the workers if hired are obliged to become the member of the union. In case, the workers do not wish to become a member, the same fees or dues are applicable to all. As, the employment opportunity are a few, this becomes a case of sheer blackmail to pay the unwanted dues. The workers can neglect the association with such unions to get saved from an agreement situation.

The dues that are paid by the workers as per the union shop agreement if known as to where is it spend or its usage is defined by the union cannot be defined as unfair. If the option to join the union is in the hand of worker and the expenditure of fairs are fairly discussed, the workers will not be addressed as unfairly penalized.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

Conclusion

Therefore, it can be concluded that the freedom of the workers is violated in a union shop agreement and the workers are not unfairly penalized if the dues are paid intentionally.

Answer 12

Ch. 12.1 - Prob. 12.1AQ Ch. 12.4 - Prob. 12.4Q Ch. 12.4 - Prob. 1MED Ch. 12.4 - Prob. 1TP Ch. 12.4 - Prob. 2TP Ch. 12.4 - Prob. 3TP Ch. 12.4 - Prob. 4TP Ch. 12.5 - Prob. 12.5AQ Ch. 12.5 - Prob. 12.5BQ Ch. 12.5 - Prob. 12.5CQ

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 12 Solutions