Owners of the two companies, namely LLC and BCM agreed to go into wood-pallet enterprises along with Ark-Mo, by allocating it 30 percent ownership interests in their future products. The owner of BCM, person L formed a new company BCR, but allocated only 5 &#37; to Ark-Mo on which G, owner of LLC objected. However, the person L promised in a telephone conversation that Ark-Mo will receive 30 percent interest in future projects. Ark-Mo did not receive any interest and therefore, he filed a case for a breach of contract. To find: The consideration to support the telephone deal.

Question

32)Unlike an arbitrator, a mediator has the power to make a final decision. true or false

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 12, Problem 7BCP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:Owners of the two companies, namely LLC and BCM agreed to go into wood-pallet enterprises along with Ark-Mo, by allocating it 30 percent ownership interests in their future products. The owner of BCM, person L formed a new company BCR, but allocated only 5 % to Ark-Mo on which G, owner of LLC objected. However, the person L promised in a telephone conversation that Ark-Mo will receive 30 percent interest in future projects. Ark-Mo did not receive any interest and therefore, he filed a case for a breach of contract.

To find: The consideration to support the telephone deal.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

32)Unlike an arbitrator, a mediator has the power to make a final decision. true or false

Noodleoo, a struggling restaurant chain, wants to enact a franchise agreement with Stephen to sell its product through a chain-style franchise. Stephen agrees and opens the store, and 6 months later Noodleoo goes bankrupt. Which is most likely true of this situation? Stephen was not responsible for looking into the financial status of Noodleoo before making the agreement. The Franchise rule does not apply to struggling companies. If Noodleoo was not transparent with its financial data, Stephen has no recourse. If Noodleoo was not transparent with its financial data, it has broken the Franchise Rule.

Sally and Tom decide to go into business, selling discounted merchandise through their website “e-Buy.” They sign a partnership agreement that requires Sally to contribute $12,000 and Tom to contribute $8,000 in capital to start the firm. The agreement also states that only Sally will have the authority to bind the partnership in deals with third parties, but the agreement says nothing about the management of the firm or a division of profits. Without Sally’s knowledge, Tom tells United Computer Products, Inc., that he represents the firm and signs a contract with United to buy hard drives for resale on e-Buy. In the first year, e-Buy makes a profit of $50,000. What are the partners’ rights with respect to the management of the firm? Is the partnership bound to the contract with United? Do the partners split the first year’s profits? If so, how much is each entitled to?