Understanding Management (MindTap Course List)
Understanding Management (MindTap Course List)
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781305502215
Author: Richard L. Daft, Dorothy Marcic
Publisher: Cengage Learning
bartleby

Concept explainers

Question
Chapter 15, Problem 9AL
Summary Introduction

To critically think:

A class discussion about the study carried out and bringing out my experience as a student if required.

Introduction:

I have always worked hard rather than worked smart throughout my school years as a student, however with the experience and knowledge gathered now I think I have changed my studying pattern to working smart.

Blurred answer
Students have asked these similar questions
Sample Case - Study  This is a case-study of an organisation called Rags to Riches Retail – they are considering making changes to their staff appraisal processes and making cuts to their staff training programme. Imagine you are a consultant who has been asked for some help by this company. You have been given a summary of information about the company as attached. Background Information   This is a large retail company selling men’s and women’s clothing in the UK, Europe and Asia It is an international, team-based organisation with a strong focus on customer service There are opportunities for staff to gain experience internationally so there is some movement of staff between the outlets in different countries. Outlets are generally open 7 days per week from 9am to 10pm each day with some variation on Sundays and national holidays according to the variability in host-country legal requirements.   The CEO and Board of Directors are committed to a vision for a learning and feedback…
Sample Case - Study  This is a case-study of an organisation called Rags to Riches Retail – they are considering making changes to their staff appraisal processes and making cuts to their staff training programme. Imagine you are a consultant who has been asked for some help by this company. You have been given a summary of information about the company as attached. Background Information   This is a large retail company selling men’s and women’s clothing in the UK, Europe and Asia It is an international, team-based organisation with a strong focus on customer service There are opportunities for staff to gain experience internationally so there is some movement of staff between the outlets in different countries. Outlets are generally open 7 days per week from 9am to 10pm each day with some variation on Sundays and national holidays according to the variability in host-country legal requirements.   The CEO and Board of Directors are committed to a vision for a learning and feedback…
This week, we are looking at a particular case study where a problem in the workplace created consequences and actions needed to be taken to mitigate those consequences. Why is it important to review these kinds of case studies when we are contemplating solving workplace problems? Can you think of an instance where reflecting on a past problem and solution has enabled you to develop solutions to a current problem?
Knowledge Booster
Management
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, management and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • Chris Dykstra, responsible for loss prevention at Electronics took a deep breath before he launched into making his case for the changes that he was proposing to the company's shoplifting policy. He knew that convincing Ross Chenoweth was going to be a hard sell. Ross, the president and CEO was the son of the founder of the local, still-family-owned consumer electronics chain based in Phoenix, Arizona. He'd inherited not only the company, but also, his father's strict moral code. "I think it's time to follow the lead of other stores," Chris began. He pointed out that most Other retailers didn't bother calling the police and pressing charges unless the thief had shoplifted merchandise worth more than $50 to $100. In contrast, Westwind currently had a zero-tolerance policy toward theft that Ross's father had put in place when he started the business. Chris wanted to replace that policy with one that prosecuted only individuals between IS and 65 who had stolen more than $20 worth of goods, and who had a previous history of theft at Westwind. In the case of first-time culprits under IS or over 65, he argued for letting them Off With a strict warning, regardless of the value of their ill-gotten goods. Repeat offenders would be arrested. "Frankly, the local police are getting pretty tired Of having to come to Our stores every time a teenager sticks a CD in his jacket pocket," Chris pointed out. "And besides, we just afford the costs associated with prosecuting everyone." Every time he pressed charges against a shoplifter who'd made Off with a $10 item, Westwind lost money. The company had to engage a lawyer and pay employees Overtime for their court appearances. In addition, Chris was looking at hiring more security guards to keep up with the workload. Westwind was already in a losing battle at the moment with mass retailers who were competing all too successfully on price, so passing on the costs of its zero-tolerance policy to Customers wasn't really an option. " Let's concentrate on catching dishonest employees and those organized-theft rings. They're the ones who are really hurting us," Chris concluded. There was a long pause after Chris finished his carefully prepared speech. Ross thought about his recently deceased father, both an astute businessman and a person for whom honesty was a key guiding principle. If he were sitting here today, he`d no doubt say that theft was theft—that setting a minimum was tantamount to saying that stealing was acceptable, just as long as you steal too much. He looked at Chris. "You know, we've both got teenagers. Is this really a message you want to send out, especially to kids? You know as well as I do that there's nothing they like better than testing limits. It's almost an invitation to see if you can beat the system." But then Ross faltered as he found himself glancing at the latest financial figures on his desk—another in a string of quarterly losses. If West-wind went under, a lot of employees would be looking for another way to make a living. In his heart, he believed in his father's high moral standards, but he had to ask himself: Just how moral could Westwind afford to be? Continue Westwind's zero-tolerance policy toward shoplifting. It's the right thing to do—and it Will pay Off in the end in higher profitability because the chain's reputation for being tough on crime Will reduce overall losses from theft.
    Chris Dykstra, responsible for loss prevention at Electronics took a deep breath before he launched into making his case for the changes that he was proposing to the company's shoplifting policy. He knew that convincing Ross Chenoweth was going to be a hard sell. Ross, the president and CEO was the son of the founder of the local, still-family-owned consumer electronics chain based in Phoenix, Arizona. He'd inherited not only the company, but also, his father's strict moral code. "I think it's time to follow the lead of other stores," Chris began. He pointed out that most Other retailers didn't bother calling the police and pressing charges unless the thief had shoplifted merchandise worth more than $50 to $100. In contrast, Westwind currently had a zero-tolerance policy toward theft that Ross's father had put in place when he started the business. Chris wanted to replace that policy with one that prosecuted only individuals between IS and 65 who had stolen more than $20 worth of goods, and who had a previous history of theft at Westwind. In the case of first-time culprits under IS or over 65, he argued for letting them Off With a strict warning, regardless of the value of their ill-gotten goods. Repeat offenders would be arrested. "Frankly, the local police are getting pretty tired Of having to come to Our stores every time a teenager sticks a CD in his jacket pocket," Chris pointed out. "And besides, we just afford the costs associated with prosecuting everyone." Every time he pressed charges against a shoplifter who'd made Off with a $10 item, Westwind lost money. The company had to engage a lawyer and pay employees Overtime for their court appearances. In addition, Chris was looking at hiring more security guards to keep up with the workload. Westwind was already in a losing battle at the moment with mass retailers who were competing all too successfully on price, so passing on the costs of its zero-tolerance policy to Customers wasn't really an option. " Let's concentrate on catching dishonest employees and those organized-theft rings. They're the ones who are really hurting us," Chris concluded. There was a long pause after Chris finished his carefully prepared speech. Ross thought about his recently deceased father, both an astute businessman and a person for whom honesty was a key guiding principle. If he were sitting here today, he`d no doubt say that theft was theft—that setting a minimum was tantamount to saying that stealing was acceptable, just as long as you steal too much. He looked at Chris. "You know, we've both got teenagers. Is this really a message you want to send out, especially to kids? You know as well as I do that there's nothing they like better than testing limits. It's almost an invitation to see if you can beat the system." But then Ross faltered as he found himself glancing at the latest financial figures on his desk—another in a string of quarterly losses. If West-wind went under, a lot of employees would be looking for another way to make a living. In his heart, he believed in his father's high moral standards, but he had to ask himself: Just how moral could Westwind afford to be? Adopt Chris Dykstra`s proposed changes, but with a higher limit than the proposed $20 amount (say, $50 or $100), but which is still less than the cost of prosecution. In addition, make sure that the policy isn't publicized. That way, you'll reduce costs even more and still benefit from your reputation for prosecuting all shoplifters.
    Chris Dykstra, responsible for loss prevention at Electronics took a deep breath before he launched into making his case for the changes that he was proposing to the company's shoplifting policy. He knew that convincing Ross Chenoweth was going to be a hard sell. Ross, the president and CEO was the son of the founder of the local, still-family-owned consumer electronics chain based in Phoenix, Arizona. He'd inherited not only the company, but also, his father's strict moral code. "I think it's time to follow the lead of other stores," Chris began. He pointed out that most Other retailers didn't bother calling the police and pressing charges unless the thief had shoplifted merchandise worth more than $50 to $100. In contrast, Westwind currently had a zero-tolerance policy toward theft that Ross's father had put in place when he started the business. Chris wanted to replace that policy with one that prosecuted only individuals between IS and 65 who had stolen more than $20 worth of goods, and who had a previous history of theft at Westwind. In the case of first-time culprits under IS or over 65, he argued for letting them Off With a strict warning, regardless of the value of their ill-gotten goods. Repeat offenders would be arrested. "Frankly, the local police are getting pretty tired Of having to come to Our stores every time a teenager sticks a CD in his jacket pocket," Chris pointed out. "And besides, we just afford the costs associated with prosecuting everyone." Every time he pressed charges against a shoplifter who'd made Off with a $10 item, Westwind lost money. The company had to engage a lawyer and pay employees Overtime for their court appearances. In addition, Chris was looking at hiring more security guards to keep up with the workload. Westwind was already in a losing battle at the moment with mass retailers who were competing all too successfully on price, so passing on the costs of its zero-tolerance policy to Customers wasn't really an option. "Let's concentrate on catching dishonest employees and those organized-theft rings. They're the ones who are really hurting us," Chris concluded. There was a long pause after Chris finished his carefully prepared speech. Ross thought about his recently deceased father, both an astute businessman and a person for whom honesty was a key guiding principle. If he were sitting here today, he`d no doubt say that theft was theft—that setting a minimum was tantamount to saying that stealing was acceptable, just as long as you steal too much. He looked at Chris. "You know, we've both got teenagers. Is this really a message you want to send out, especially to kids? You know as well as I do that there's nothing they like better than testing limits. It's almost an invitation to see if you can beat the system." But then Ross faltered as he found himself glancing at the latest financial figures on his desk—another in a string of quarterly losses. If West-wind went under, a lot of employees would be looking for another way to make a living. In his heart, he believed in his father's high moral standards, but he had to ask himself: Just how moral could Westwind afford to be? Adopt Chris Dykstra's proposed changes and show more leniency to first-time offenders. It is a more cost effective approach to the problem than the current policy, plus it stays close to your father's Original intent.
  • Create a Group Control System Step 1. From into groups of three to five students. Each group will assume that another student group has been given an assignment of writing a major paper that will involve research by individual group members that will be integrated into the final paper. Each group member has to do his or part. Step 2. Your assignment is develop a list of rules and identify some statistics by which to control the behavior of members in that group. Brainstorm and discuss potential to govern member behavior and consequences for breaking those rules. Step 3. First, select the five rules that you think are most important for governing group member behavior. Consider the following situations that rules might cover; arriving late for a meeting: missing a meeting: failing to complete a work assignment; disagreements about desired quality of work; how to resolve conflicts about paper content; differences in participation , such as one person doing all the talking and someone else talking hardly at all; how to handle meetings that start late; the use of an agenda and handling deviations from the agenda; and any other situation that your group a cover. Step 4. Now consider what statistics could be developed to measure the behavior and outcome of the group pertaining to those five rules. What kinds of things could be counted to understand how group is performing and whether members are the following rules? Step 5. Discuss the following questions. Why are rules important as a means of control? What are the advantages and disadvantages of having many rules (hierarchical control) versus few rules (decentralized control) for a student group? How can statistics help a group ensure? appropriate behavior and a high-quality product? Step 6. Be prepared to present your conclusions to the Class.
    Please answer the four questions at the end of the case study. Length: 2-3 complete paragraphs for each case study question. Having advanced in finance departments of various large manufacturing companies, Margo Romano secured her dream job as CFO and executive committee member for a successful family-owned tool and die manufacturing company. She was worried about being the first nonfamily executive committee member, but the business was well-regarded in the sector and offered outstanding remuneration. She also worked hard to get along with the executive committee, notably the CEO. The CEO, the daughter of the company's founder, told Margo privately that she stood by her and that Margo was the “perfect match” for the executive committee position, even though some family members were initially hesitant. After Margo had been with the firm for a year, the CEO convened an executive committee meeting to announce that the company will shrink for the first time in its history due to rapid…
    Beginning in November 2001, the newly created federal Transportation Security Administration (TSA) was faced with the task of replacing private contractor airport security screeners with government employees. Well over 10,000 replacements had to be made and well over 100,000 applicants sought the new government positions. Consulting companies bid on this federal contract. Suppose company A suggested that the project could be accomplished more quickly if a job analysis were not conducted. Suppose company B suggested that ­“selection panels” be formed to interview and screen applicants. Suppose company C proposed to administer mental ability tests using local colleges to give tests at computer workstations. Which of these proposals would appear most promising and which least promising? Why?
  • .Case StudyThe case study main goal is to show that first impressions are formed promptly and are often highly precise. After seeing a person for just few seconds, people make determinations about another’s personal and professional attributes. Rahul/Ria is a 21- year-old fresher, who has just graduated from the college. He/she has an important interview. a. How much does a person’s dress style impact the First Impression? Assume that you are Rahul/Ria what are the key areas that you would work upon to create a lasting first impression?  b. What are the set of etiquette that Rahul/Ria needs to follow during the interview?
    The director of the safety department just approached you to investigate OSHA’s resources. He’s looking for a recognition program for workplace safety that would work well for the lab. Particularly, the director is proud of the work his team has done to instill safety into the workplace and wants them to get some official recognition. Using the resources provided to you in this module, determine which of OSHA’s offerings might be best suited to what the director is looking for, and what next steps you’d recommend. Write a paragraph or two with your recommendation?
    Misconduct in the workplace is not uncommon. Employees who are dissatisfied with their jobs routinely violate their organizations' standards of conduct. Disgruntled employees create various ethical difficulties in the workplace, whether by abusing corporate time, stealing credit for others' efforts, or bullying their co-workers.The 2020 Global Business Ethics Survey conducted by the Ethics & Compliance Initiative (ECI) indicates that 49 % of U.S. employees had observed wrongdoing that breached their organization's ethical norms. The rate of reporting wrongdoing has reached an all-time high of 86%. As for the global trend, the 2020 global median (33%) for observed misconduct is the same as in 2015, although there was a slight dip in 2019 (25%). The country-by-country comparison shows that some countries had a decrease in misconduct while others remained about the same or increased slightly. Based on the information given, EXPLAIN FOUR (4) the initiatives that the organization may…
  • Describe the tool and explain its uses and benefits. Share an example of how to use the tool (apply it to your individual workplace problem, if you can). Include diagrams or other visuals as appropriate.
    Joe works for SoPo Ice Cream. On break it is normal for the employees to help themselves to a scoop or two of ice cream and eat it in the break room. Joe knows the ice cream isn’t free and in training on the first day his manager told him that employees aren’t allowed to eat any SoPo Ice Cream without paying for it, and then winked at Joe. Which of the following statements best describes Joe’s situation?The employees work hard and it is understood that eating some ice cream is part of their pay;No one is harmed;Everyone is doing it, including his manager, and there’s no reason he shouldn’t;The ice cream costs the company money and eating it without paying for it is stealing.Based upon the suggestions made in the text, what do you recommend Joe do in this situation?  Think about whether Joe might do or not do something now and take another step(s) later depending upon the outcome of the first.
    Please Help me in my Case Study :( HRM - CASE STUDY Praveen’s Human Relations’ Dilemma Joseph is a supervisor in the Design Department of Advent Engineering Company. Henry is in charge of the Model Shop. Both are with the company for the past five years. They graduated from the same institute and knew each other fairly well. They hold equal positions and received the same level of compensation. Joseph and Henry report to Praveen who manages the Design Department. Due to other responsibilities, Praveen has given scant attention to the work of the Design Section and the Model Shop and has spent little time with his men. In his opinion, both are good and know their jobs well and so why bother. I can rely on them since both are responsible people. Joseph and Henry were good friends for the past couple of years, they were having bitter arguments over technical matters, and the division of responsibility for jobs was handled by both departments. Praveen has some knowledge of this situation…
    • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
    Recommended textbooks for you
  • Understanding Management (MindTap Course List)
    Management
    ISBN:9781305502215
    Author:Richard L. Daft, Dorothy Marcic
    Publisher:Cengage Learning
    Management, Loose-Leaf Version
    Management
    ISBN:9781305969308
    Author:Richard L. Daft
    Publisher:South-Western College Pub
  • Understanding Management (MindTap Course List)
    Management
    ISBN:9781305502215
    Author:Richard L. Daft, Dorothy Marcic
    Publisher:Cengage Learning
    Management, Loose-Leaf Version
    Management
    ISBN:9781305969308
    Author:Richard L. Daft
    Publisher:South-Western College Pub