(1) The state has a right to intervene on behalf of unborn children, and (2)this right should be implemented immediately. (3) Whille it may be true that a mere fetus has no rights, (4) surely a born child does have rights, and (5) these rights project backward to the time it was in the womb. This is true because (6)what happens to the child in the womb can have an impact throughout the child's life. (7) It is well known that alcohol and drug abuse by expectant mothers cause birth defects, and (8) these defects are not correctable after birth. (9) Granted, an expectant mother has the right to treat her own body as she chooses, but (10) this right does not extend to her unborn child. (11) Once a pregnant woman decides to give birth, she effectively transfers part of her rights over to her unborn child. (12) Unfortunately, however, the unborn child is incapable of securing these rights for itself. Thus, (13) the intervention of a higher power is justified.
Experts are waiting 24/7 to provide step-by-step solutions in as fast as 30 minutes!*
*Response times vary by subject and question complexity. Median response time is 34 minutes and may be longer for new subjects.