Case s ummary : Person J, resides in New Jersey, desired to start a restaurant business. He asked person K, residing in New York, for legal and business advice related to the exchange for a 20 percent ownership interest of the restaurant. Person J opened a restaurant CO with the help of K and cut K out of the deal. The restaurant became a success and K filed a suit against J and the company for the damages. To f ind : The jurisdiction of the federal court over the parties on the grounds of diversity of citizenship.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 17, Problem 2BS

Summary Introduction

Case s ummary : Person J, resides in New Jersey, desired to start a restaurant business. He asked person K, residing in New York, for legal and business advice related to the exchange for a 20 percent ownership interest of the restaurant. Person J opened a restaurant CO with the help of K and cut K out of the deal. The restaurant became a success and K filed a suit against J and the company for the damages.

To f ind :The jurisdiction of the federal court over the parties on the grounds of diversity of citizenship.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Business Case Problem with Sample Answer—Determining Employee Status. Nelson Ovalles workedas a cable installer for Cox Rhode Island Telecom,LLC, under an agreement with a third party,M&M Communications, Inc. the agreementstated that no employer-employee relationshipexisted between Cox and M&M’s technicians, includingOvalles. Ovalles was required to designate his aliation withCox on his work van, clothing, and identication badge. Coxhad minimal contact with him, however, and had limitedpower to control how he performed his duties. Cox suppliedcable wire and similar items, but the equipment was delivered to M&M, not to Ovalles. On a workday, while Ovalleswas fullling a work order, his van rear-ended a car driven byBarbara Cayer. Is Cox liable to Cayer? Explain. [Cayer v. CoxRhode Island Telecom, LLC, 85 A.3d 1140 (R.I. 2014)] (SeeAgency Law.)

Zuhair, section associate in Almadar company has found the fraud done by one of his colleagues in his section. In this situation, which of the following option is appropriated initial action of Mr. Zuhair to do if he does whistleblowing? a. Discuss the issue with the family as they may be affected b. Leave the company c. Approach immediate manager and make the manager aware of the issue d. Go outside the company and discuss with the media

Stephen Glass made himself infamous as a dishonest journalist by fabricating material for more than forty articles for The New Republic and other publications. At the time, he was a law student at Georgetown University. Once suspicions were aroused, Glass tried to avoid detection. Later, Glass applied for admission to the California bar. The California Supreme Court denied his application, citing “numerous instances of dishonesty” during his “rehabilitation” following the exposure of his misdeeds. How do these circumstances underscore the importance of ethics?