Company VVE constructed PLGC and estates in country T in two phases, 1 and 2. Another company VVP had cut the roadways and constructed water, sewer, and stormwater lines with the help of water inlets for development purposes. Person F, the president and owner of VVP and a sole general partner of company VVP, failed to get the proper permits for the development work in a timely manner. Person F also failed to comply with the requirement of the permits, once the permit was obtained. Person MD who was the attorney general of the state filed a case against company VVE and person F for presumably violating the law of water pollution control in the state. The court entered the judgment in favor of F. To find: The apportionment of penalties amongst the three defendants.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 17, Problem 2CT

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Company VVE constructed PLGC and estates in country T in two phases, 1 and 2. Another company VVP had cut the roadways and constructed water, sewer, and stormwater lines with the help of water inlets for development purposes. Person F, the president and owner of VVP and a sole general partner of company VVP, failed to get the proper permits for the development work in a timely manner. Person F also failed to comply with the requirement of the permits, once the permit was obtained. Person MD who was the attorney general of the state filed a case against company VVE and person F for presumably violating the law of water pollution control in the state. The court entered the judgment in favor of F.

To find: The apportionment of penalties amongst the three defendants.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Ellen, a citizen of California, was seriously injured in an automobile accident while driving in California. She was injured due to the negligence of Sara, a citizen of Arizona, who ran a red light at an intersection. Ellen is seeking 1.5 million in damages. 1. Where may Ellen bring her suit? 2. Discuss the process Ellen would have to follow in order to fully litigate her claim. 3. If Sara is granted summary judgment at the trial court level, what may Ellen do next? Explain her options.

Is the job exempt or non-exempt under the (FLSA)? Why or why not?Case 1.Harry Phipps, Senior Professional Sales RepresentativeHarry Phipps was employed by K & K Pharmaceutical Company as a senior professional salesrepresentative. Phipps’ position required him to travel across doctors’ offices and hospitals where hepromoted the benefit of K & K’s drug, Provita, to the prescribing doctors. K & K used this method in thehope that when doctors realized the benefit of Provita, they would prescribe the drug for their patients.By law, Phipps could not sell the drug directly to doctors. The company provided Phipps with a list oftarget doctors, and he was expected to complete ten visits per day, and each doctor had to be visited atleast once a quarter. K & K left the itinerary and method of achieving the targets up to Phipps. However,they did provide Phipps with a budget for the visits. He was also given pre-approved visual aids and hadreceived training in basic “marketing”…

The manager of Palms Restaurant assembles all employees and announces that because theft isoccurring, she would fire employees until the guilty party confessed. Turning to an employee, Alice, themanager says, "You're fired." Palms Restaurant is in an employment-at-will state. Discuss if Alice has anylegal remedy against Palms.