Concept explainers
To discuss: The difference between unfair-trade and fair-trade laws. Would Person X support unfair-trade or fair-trade laws as a customer and as the owner of small store, would he support unfair-trade or fair-trade laws.
Explanation of Solution
Fair-trade laws: This law let the producer to fix minimum prices for the goods and it is necessary for the dealer to sign contract agreeing to those terms and conditions. These are the state laws that permit the wholesalers or producers to decide the minimum price that has to be charged by all the retailers for handling the product.
Unfair-trade laws: This law wants the sellers to retain minimum prices for comparable merchandise. Instead of concentrating on the final retail price, they force retailers and wholesalers to add a minimum markup value for their product that allows them to sell products at lower cost to attract customers.
Person X support unfair-trade or fair-trade laws as a customer is as follows:
In case of customer, Person X would not be favor of unfair-trade or fair trade laws because it might lead to higher prices.
Person X support unfair-trade or fair-trade laws as an owner of small store is as follows:
In case of small store owner, Person X be in favor of unfair-trade or fair trade laws because they support small businesses to fight with large businesses chains.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 18 Solutions
Contemporary Marketing (MindTap Course List)
- How does fair trade support the philosophy and practices of conscious capitalism? What are the challenges to implementation of fair trade in the developing world?arrow_forwardWhat is unfair trade practice act?arrow_forwardHealthcare What if you own and live on a commercial farm and grow wheat for sale, but you also set aside a fairly large amount for your family's personal consumption. Are you affecting interstate commerce in such a way that Congress should be able to regulate it?arrow_forward
- Please read the instructions carefully and submit the assignment. Identify any top Indian Company. Understand the CSR activities of the identified company. Discuss the impact of CSR activities of the identified company on its various stakeholders in not more than 500 wordsarrow_forwardWhat is predatory dumping? When does it occur?arrow_forwardThe political and legal environment in Ghana is very stable and peaceful. Using yourchosen organisation, why do you think it is essential for Ghanaian businesses to be aware of thetrends in the political-legal environment.arrow_forward
- watch Righteous Practice: The Intersection of Business Law and Human Rights (Links to an external site.) CLP Speaker Series - Righteous Practice: The Intersection of Business Law & Human Rights - YouTube and discuss the following questions: Do companies have a social responsibility to their communities and stakeholders? To which stakeholders do the companies have responsibilities? What are your thoughts about situations where business law enables damage through its design?arrow_forwardBusiness Ethics Is it morally permissible for pharmaceutical drug makers to give samples of their drugs to doctors for redistribution to their patients? Why or why not?arrow_forwardAffirmative action is a policy that can be helpful in some situations, but harmful in others if used inappropriately. Can you give an example where it could help versus hurt?arrow_forward
- What penalties and punishments can be imposed on businesses that violate consumer rights under the Consumer Protection Act?arrow_forwardGiven the principles noted in the case, how can companies comment on their positive actions to promote human rights so that consumers will think well of them? Would you propose that a company (a) do nothing, (b) construct a corporate code of ethics, or (c) align itself with some of the universal covenants or compacts prepared by international agencies?arrow_forwardThough many MNCs espouse and follow rigid codes of social responsibility in their home countries they are often not as diligent with respect to ‘host’ or overseas countries. In 1984 the Bhopal disaster in Madhya Pradesh, India killed 3,787 and impacted a further 558,125 people. The corporation in question was Union Carbide, a majority USA owned company. Indian courts convicted the Chairman and other senior executives of “…causing death by negligence”. Why do you believe that Union Carbide had a less stringent policy in India with respect to negligence than they did in the USA? What is the way to fix this situation? Explain whether it is legislation or cultural change from MNCs that is requiredarrow_forward
