(a)
Interpretation:
The cell potential (EMF) of given voltaic cell should be calculated by using standard reduction potentials and effect of cell potential in given conditions should be explained.
Concept introduction:
Cell potential (EMF):
The maximum potential difference between two electrodes of voltaic cell is known as cell potential.
If standard reduction potentials of electrodes are given the cell potential (EMF) is given by,
Where,
(b)
Interpretation:
The cell potential (EMF) of given voltaic cell should be calculated by using standard reduction potentials and effect of cell potential in given conditions should be explained.
Concept introduction:
Cell potential (EMF):
The maximum potential difference between two electrodes of voltaic cell is known as cell potential.
If standard reduction potentials of electrodes are given the cell potential (EMF) is given by,
Where,
(c)
Interpretation:
The cell potential (EMF) of given voltaic cell should be calculated by using standard reduction potentials and effect of cell potential in given conditions should be explained.
Concept introduction:
Cell potential (EMF):
The maximum potential difference between two electrodes of voltaic cell is known as cell potential.
If standard reduction potentials of electrodes are given the cell potential (EMF) is given by,
Where,
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 19 Solutions
General Chemistry - Standalone book (MindTap Course List)
- A galvanic cell is based on the following half-reactions: In this cell, the copper compartment contains a copper electrode and [Cu2+] = 1.00 M, and the vanadium compartment contains a vanadium electrode and V2+ at an unknown concentration. The compartment containing the vanadium (1.00 L of solution) was titrated with 0.0800 M H2EDTA2, resulting in the reaction H2EDTA2(aq)+V2+(aq)VEDTA2(aq)+2H+(aq)K=? The potential of the cell was monitored to determine the stoichiometric point for the process, which occurred at a volume of 500.0 mL H2EDTA2 solution added. At the stoichiometric point, was observed to be 1 .98 V. The solution was buffered at a pH of 10.00. a. Calculate before the titration was carried out. b. Calculate the value of the equilibrium constant, K, for the titration reaction. c. Calculate at the halfway point in the titration.arrow_forwardA voltaic cell is constructed in which one half-cell consists of a silver wire in an aqueous solution of AgNO3.The other half cell consists of an inert platinum wire in an aqueous solution containing Fe2+(aq) and Fe3+(aq). (a) Calculate the cell potential, assuming standard conditions. (b) Write the net ionic equation for the reaction occurring in the cell. (c) Which electrode is the anode and which is the cathode? (d) If [Ag+] is 0.10 M, and [Fe2+] and [Fe3+] are both 1.0 M, what is the cell potential? Is the net cell reaction still that used in part (a)? If not, what is the net reaction under the new conditions?arrow_forwardConsider a galvanic cell based on the following half-reactions: a. What is the expected cell potential with all components in their standard states? b. What is the oxidizing agent in the overall cell reaction? c. What substances make up the anode compartment? d. In the standard cell, in which direction do the electrons flow? e. How many electrons are transferred per unit of cell reaction? f. If this cell is set up at 25C with [Fe2+] = 2.00 104 M and [La3+] = 3.00 103 M, what is the expected cell potential?arrow_forward
- An aqueous solution of an unknown salt of gold is electrolyzed by a current of 2.75 amps for 3.39 hours. The electroplating is carried out with an efficiency of 93.0%, resulting in a deposit of 21.221 g of gold. a How many faradays are required to deposit the gold? b What is the charge on the gold ions (based on your calculations)?arrow_forwardCalculate the cell potential of a cell operating with the following reaction at 25C, in which [MnO4] = 0.010 M, [Br] = 0.010 M. [Mn2] = 0.15 M, and [H] = 1.0 M. 2MNO4(aq)+10Br(aq)+16H+(aq)2MN2(aq)+5Br2(l)+8H2O(l)arrow_forwardAn electrochemical cell consists of a silver metal electrode immersed in a solution with [Ag+] = 1.00 M separated by a porous disk from a compartment with a copper metal electrode immersed in a solution of 10.00 M NH3 that also contains 2.4 103 M Cu(NH3)42+. The equilibrium between Cu2+ and NH3 is: Cu2+(aq)+4NH3(aq)Cu(NH3)42+(aq)K=1.01013 and the two cell half-reactions are: Assuming Ag+ is reduced, what is the cell potential at 25C?arrow_forward
- An electrolysis experiment is performed to determine the value of the Faraday constant (number of coulombs per mole of electrons). In this experiment, 28.8 g of gold is plated out from a AuCN solution by running an electrolytic cell for two hours with a current of 2.00 A. What is the experimental value obtained for the Faraday Constant?arrow_forwardGiven this reaction, its standard potential, and the standard half-cell potential of 0.34 V for the Cu2+ |Cu half-cell, calculate E° for the Fe(s)|Fe2+(aq) half-cell.arrow_forwardFor the cell: Cr|Cr3+Co2+|Co E° is 0.46 V. The same cell was prepared in the laboratory at standard conditions. The voltage obtained was 0.40 V. A possible explanation for the difference is (a) the surface area of the chromium electrode was smaller than the cobalt electrode. (b) the mass of the chromium electrode was larger than the mass of the cobalt electrode. (c) the concentration of Cr(NO3)2 solution used was less than 1.0 M. (d) the concentration of Cr(NO3)2 solution used was less than 1.0 M. (e) the volume of Cr(NO3)2 solution used was larger than the volume of Cr(NO3)2 solution used.arrow_forward
- General Chemistry - Standalone book (MindTap Cour...ChemistryISBN:9781305580343Author:Steven D. Gammon, Ebbing, Darrell Ebbing, Steven D., Darrell; Gammon, Darrell Ebbing; Steven D. Gammon, Darrell D.; Gammon, Ebbing; Steven D. Gammon; DarrellPublisher:Cengage LearningChemistry: Principles and PracticeChemistryISBN:9780534420123Author:Daniel L. Reger, Scott R. Goode, David W. Ball, Edward MercerPublisher:Cengage LearningChemistry & Chemical ReactivityChemistryISBN:9781337399074Author:John C. Kotz, Paul M. Treichel, John Townsend, David TreichelPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Chemistry & Chemical ReactivityChemistryISBN:9781133949640Author:John C. Kotz, Paul M. Treichel, John Townsend, David TreichelPublisher:Cengage LearningChemistryChemistryISBN:9781305957404Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCostePublisher:Cengage Learning