The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781305967304
Author: Frank B. Cross, Roger LeRoy Miller
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
Chapter 19, Problem 2IS
Summary Introduction
Case Summary :Person E contracted with another person D to buy a horse on her behalf. E directed D not to disclose her identity. D bought a horse from FS and made the down payment. Later, E did not make rest of the payment. FS sued D for a breach of contract.
To find: The liability of E to pay the damages.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
For the scenario, determine if the party is liable and what is "at play" related to agreement between parties.
Joy threatens Winston at knifepoint to sign a prenuptial agreement until he complies.
a. Liable - Duress
b. Not Liable
c. Liable - Undue influence
d. Liable - Fraud in the execution..
George develops upper- and middle-income townhouses and condo flats. He hired Pommella as his agent to sell the flat. Pommella is engaged on a fixed-term contract and is paid a predetermined salary plus commission according on the number of flats she sells. George is considering ending the agency relationship with Pomella. Explain to him
THREE (3) options to end the relationship lawfully under agency law.
Over a cup of coffee in a restaurant, X Invites Y to dinner at his house on a Sunday. Y hires a taxi and reaches X’s house at the appointed time , but x fails to perform his promise. Can Y recover any damages from X? (a) Yes, as y has suffered (b) No, as the intention was not to create legal relation. (c) Either (a) or (b) (d) None of these.
Chapter 19 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, subject and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Courtney and Jonathan agreed that Jonathan would paint Courtney's home for $800 with Courtney supplying the paint. Jonathan went to Courtney's home on several occasions to do the job, but she never had the paint. Finally, he moved on to other jobs. Six months later, Courtney sued Jonathan for not painting her home. Who is likely to win and why? Include the legal term for Jonathan's offer of performance.arrow_forwardKaren, a senior manager in Consult-Biz Inc., encourages Charles, her junior manager, to bill Consult-Biz's clients for his commute time, and identify it as "meet and confer with senior manager." Karen explains that she will then adjust her own billing sheet to match this entry.Karen tells Charles that all other Consult-Biz junior and senior managers engage in this practice, and that clients have never questioned such entries. Charles is not sure whether this would be an ethical action. What should Charles do?arrow_forwardBryan is a purchaser for Ace Widgets. Bryan’s brother-in-law is a salesperson for Niche Electronics, one of Ace’s largest suppliers. Bryan told his supervisor about the relationship, and she approved his ordering of supplies from his brother-in-law as long as the purchases were reviewed by a senior manager. Bryan did not receive any favor or money from his brother-in- law in return for the sales. A year after Bryan discussed the situation with his supervisor, Ace’s management discovers that another supplier offers the same parts as Niche Electronics but at cheaper prices. Ace Widgets is considering suing Bryan for conflict of interest. Which of the following is the most accurate statement about Ace’s chances of success? Choices: A. Ace’s chances are good because it could have gotten the supplies at a lower price. B. Ace’s chances are poor because Bryan did not actually receive any money from his brother-in-law for sending him business. C. Ace’s chances are poor because the company was…arrow_forward
- Morris, a salesperson for Acme, Inc., a manufacturer of household appliances, receives a commission on all sales made and no further compensation. He drives his own automobile, pays his own expenses, and calls on whom he pleases. While driving to make a call on a potential customer, Morris negligently collides with Hudson, who sues (a) Acme and (b) Morris. Who should be held liable?arrow_forwardWilliam Schmalz entered into an employment contract with Hardy Salt Company. The contract granted Schmalz six months’ severance pay for involuntary termination but none for voluntary separation or termination for cause. Schmalz was asked to resign from his employment. He was informed that if he did not resign, he would be fired for alleged misconduct. When Schmalz turned in his letter of resignation, he signed a release prohibiting him from suing his former employer as a consequence of his employment. Schmalz consulted an attorney before signing the release and upon signing it received $4,583 (one month’s salary) in consideration. Schmalz now sues his former employer for the severance pay, claiming that he signed the release under duress. Is Schmalz correct in his assertion?arrow_forwardFlorida land developer Lehigh would show prospective buyers Lehigh Acres and have the buyers stay at its motel. Competitor Azar would watch for the buyers, contact them at the motel, tell them that under federal law they had three days to cancel any contract with Lehigh, and then show them a less expensive property that he was selling. Question: What legal tort could apply in this circumstance?arrow_forward
- Pattie purchases a couch from Good Stuff, Inc., to use in her home. She pays for the couch, and Good Stuff agrees to deliver it. Unfortunately, on the way to her house, the delivery truck overheats and burns, destroying the truck and the couch inside. Pattie asks for a refund or another couch. Good Stuff’s owner refuses. If Pattie decides to sue Good Stuff, which party is likely to prevail? Explain. (In your answer, be sure to identify and discuss which law(s) might apply and how that could affect the outcome.)arrow_forwardLend Co. discovered that one of its employees, Dana, is an alcoholic. Her manager realized that Dana's alcoholism must be the reason for her absenteeism. To help Dana overcome her alcoholiśm, the employer provided her with counseling services and also asked her to make a firm choice between treatment and discipline. Lend Co. also offered outpatient treatment, and Dana participated in the program without success. When all of these efforts failed, Lend Co. offered to provide inpatient treatment, and Dana refused. Lend Co. fired Dana. According to the courts: O A. Dana has a valid claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act because she willingly participated in the outpatient treatment, even though it did not produce positive results. O B. Lend Co. is not liable under the Americans with Disabilities Act because it offered a reasonable accommodation, and Dana refused. O C. Lend Co, is liable under the Americans with Disabilities Act because it failed to offer Dana time off from…arrow_forwardIn partnership with American Express, Porter Cable requests that all employees at the rank of supervisor and above apply for a corporate credit card to be used for pay for travel, training and similar expenses. Ima Krimnel, the manager of the distribution center, was issued a corporate card and used it to take her husband to Hawaii for their 20th wedding anniversary. If Krimnel does not pay the charges, is Porter Cable liable? Why or why not?arrow_forward
- Dean was hired on February 12 as a sales manager of the Co-op Dairy for a minimum period of one year with the dairy agreeing to pay his moving expenses. By February 26, Dean had signed a lease, moved his family from Oklahoma to Arizona, and reported for work. After he worked for a few days, he was fired. Dean then brought this action against the dairy for his salary for the year, less what he was paid. The dairy argues that the statute of frauds bars enforcement of the oral contract because the contract was not to be performed within one year. Is the dairy correct in its assertion?arrow_forwardState whether the following agreements or contracts are void, voidable valid, and provide a reason for your answer. 1 ) Taylor, aged 17, gets married, and divorces two months later. After getting divorced, she enters into a contract with Michael for the sale of his house. ( 2 ) Jessica, aged 5, enters into a contract with John, aged 11, for the sale of his bicycle. 3 ) Nomsa, aged 16, runs a successful boutique with the consent of her parents, and enters into a contract relating to her business. 4 ) Amy, who is 17, has inherited an apartment in Cape Town from her deceased father. The apartment is valued at R2 million. With her mother’s assistance, Amy enters into an agreement to sell the apartment to her aunt. 5 ) Justin, who is mentally ill, concludes a contract for the sale of his laptop without his curator knowing. (2)arrow_forward) Jack was sued by Wowley for defamation, because of statements made by Jack in the public domain, which impugned wrongful, unethical behaviour by Wowley. Samla was subpoena to attend court as a witness, because she was present when Jack made the alleged defamatory statements. Jack as an incentive to Samla to attend court, promised to pay her the sum of $10,000 for her loss of time, but later on reneged on his promise, telling Samla to sue him because he is not giving her one cent. Samla thereafter sued Jack to enforce his promise, with a view to get the promised $10,000. Jack knows you are a Business law student and is seeking your advice on the matter. Please advise Jack.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education