Company S sells the heating, cooling and security setups for homes. It employs installer and technicians for its projects and allows them to exercise their own judgement and control in the execution of the work. To find: The employment status of installers and technicians in the given case.

Question

Business Case Problem with Sample Answer—Determining Employee Status. Nelson Ovalles workedas a cable installer for Cox Rhode Island Telecom,LLC, under an agreement with a third party,M&M Communications, Inc. the agreementstated that no employer-employee relationshipexisted between Cox and M&M’s technicians, includingOvalles. Ovalles was required to designate his aliation withCox on his work van, clothing, and identication badge. Coxhad minimal contact with him, however, and had limitedpower to control how he performed his duties. Cox suppliedcable wire and similar items, but the equipment was delivered to M&M, not to Ovalles. On a workday, while Ovalleswas fullling a work order, his van rear-ended a car driven byBarbara Cayer. Is Cox liable to Cayer? Explain. [Cayer v. CoxRhode Island Telecom, LLC, 85 A.3d 1140 (R.I. 2014)] (SeeAgency Law.)

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 19, Problem 8BCP

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Company S sells the heating, cooling and security setups for homes. It employs installer and technicians for its projects and allows them to exercise their own judgement and control in the execution of the work.

To find: The employment status of installers and technicians in the given case.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Business Case Problem with Sample Answer—Determining Employee Status. Nelson Ovalles workedas a cable installer for Cox Rhode Island Telecom,LLC, under an agreement with a third party,M&M Communications, Inc. the agreementstated that no employer-employee relationshipexisted between Cox and M&M’s technicians, includingOvalles. Ovalles was required to designate his aliation withCox on his work van, clothing, and identication badge. Coxhad minimal contact with him, however, and had limitedpower to control how he performed his duties. Cox suppliedcable wire and similar items, but the equipment was delivered to M&M, not to Ovalles. On a workday, while Ovalleswas fullling a work order, his van rear-ended a car driven byBarbara Cayer. Is Cox liable to Cayer? Explain. [Cayer v. CoxRhode Island Telecom, LLC, 85 A.3d 1140 (R.I. 2014)] (SeeAgency Law.)

ETHICS Pete, an accountant, recommended that several of his clients invest in Competition Aircraft. These clients passed this recommendation on to Arlene, who did invest. Unfortunately, Competition was a fraudulent company that pretended to sell airplanes. After the company went bankrupt, she sought to recover from Pete. Is Pete liable to Arlene? Whether or not Pete faces legal liability, is it a good idea for accountants to recommend investments to clients? Does that practice create any potential conflicts of interest?

Zuhair, section associate in Almadar company has found the fraud done by one of his colleagues in his section. In this situation, which of the following option is appropriated initial action of Mr. Zuhair to do if he does whistleblowing? a. Discuss the issue with the family as they may be affected b. Leave the company c. Approach immediate manager and make the manager aware of the issue d. Go outside the company and discuss with the media