Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Course List)
8th Edition
ISBN: 9781305971509
Author: N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 23, Problem 2CQQ
To determine
The impact on aggregate demand by tax cuts and government spending.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
In a Keynesian model, why would a $100 million increase in government expenditure on goodsand services have a greater impact on aggregate demand than a $100 million reduction in taxrevenue?A Consumers spend only part of any extra disposable income.B Government expenditure does not create wealth.C The marginal tax rate affects the value of the multiplier.D The multiplier does not apply to consumer expenditure.
Given a simple Keynesian spending multiplier of 2, how will GDP (Y) change when business investment increases by $15 billion, exports increase by $5 billion, and government spending drops by $10 billion?
Y increases by $20 billion.
Y decreases by $20 billion.
Y decreases by $10 billion.
Y remains unchanged.
According to traditional Keynesian analysis, a tax cut has a larger effect on aggregate demand than an increase in government expenditures of the same size.
a.true
b.false
Chapter 23 Solutions
Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Course List)
Ch. 23.1 - Prob. 1QQCh. 23.2 - Prob. 2QQCh. 23.3 - Prob. 3QQCh. 23.4 - Prob. 4QQCh. 23.5 - Prob. 5QQCh. 23.6 - Prob. 6QQCh. 23 - Prob. 1CQQCh. 23 - Prob. 2CQQCh. 23 - Prob. 3CQQCh. 23 - Prob. 4CQQ
Ch. 23 - Prob. 5CQQCh. 23 - Prob. 6CQQCh. 23 - Prob. 1QRCh. 23 - Prob. 2QRCh. 23 - Prob. 3QRCh. 23 - Prob. 4QRCh. 23 - Prob. 5QRCh. 23 - Prob. 6QRCh. 23 - Prob. 7QRCh. 23 - Prob. 8QRCh. 23 - Prob. 9QRCh. 23 - Prob. 10QRCh. 23 - Prob. 1PACh. 23 - Prob. 2PACh. 23 - Prob. 3PACh. 23 - Prob. 4PACh. 23 - Prob. 5PACh. 23 - Prob. 6PACh. 23 - Prob. 7PACh. 23 - Prob. 8PA
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- With the aid of a diagram and using the Keynesian analysis, explain in detail how income and aggregate spending are affected by the followinga) ‘government should step in and spend’b) A cut in spending by European firmsarrow_forwardAlthough our development of the Keynesian cross in this chapter assumes that taxes are a fixed amount, most countries levy some taxes that rise automatically with national income. (Examples in the United States include the income tax and the payroll tax.) Let’s represent the tax system by writing tax revenue as T = T− + tY, where T− and t are parameters of the tax code. The parameter t is the marginal tax rate: if income rises by $1, taxes rise by t × $1. 1.How does this tax system change the way consumption responds to changes in GDP? 2. Im the Keynesian cross, how does this tax system alter the government purchases multiplier? 3. In the IS–LM model, how does this tax system alter the slope of the IS curve? (solve all three tasks)arrow_forwardAccording to Keynesian economics, what impact would a balanced budget amendment to the constuition requiring the federal government to balance its budget annually have on the economy?arrow_forward
- According to Keynesian analysis; the proper government response to a recession is _________,whereas an Austrian would support __________.A)expansionary fiscal/monetary policy; laissez-faireB)the implemention of a corporatist bailout of insolvent firms; raising taxesC)expansionary fiscal policy; expansionary monetary policyD)increasing government spending; increasing the legal powers of the central bank to deal withthe crisisarrow_forwardTwo identical countries, Country A and Country B, can each be described by a Keynesian-cross model. The MPC is 0.6 in each country. Country A decides to increase government spending by $2 billion, while Country B decides to cut taxes by $2 billion. In which country will the new equilibrium level of income be greater? Show all computations.arrow_forwardIllustrate the impact of a $500 million increase in government spending by adjusting the graph. In the full Keynesian model, the marginal propensity to save (MPS) is 0.25. Aggregate expenditure (in millions of dollars)Aggregate income = real GDP (in millions of dollars)AE = AIC+I+G+X−M What is the resulting change in output? Output decreases by $2,000 million, or $2 billion. Output increases by $500 million×1.33$500 million×1.33 , or $666.6 million. Output decreases by $500 million×1.33$500 million×1.33 , or $666.6 million. Output increases by $2,000 million, or $2 billion. If the government cut taxes by $500 million instead, what would be the resulting change in output? Output decreases by $1,500 million, or $1.5 billion. Output increases by $666.6 million. Output increases by $1,500 million, or $1.5 billion. Output decreases by $500 million×0.25$500 million×0.25 , or $125 million.arrow_forward
- Suppose actual real GDP is $9.06 trillion, potential real GDP is $6.42 trillion, and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.59. If we ignore price effects, by how many trillions of dollars should the government change its lump sum taxes to fix the gap? (Round this to two digits after the decimal and enter this value as either a positive value or a negative value without the dollar sign.)arrow_forwardConsider a Keynesian model but where investment (just like consumption) is increasing in aggregate income, e.g., because investment depends on business cash flow. Now that investment depends on aggregate income, a fiscal stimulus has more effect on equilibrium output.Answer true, false, or uncertain. Please briefly explain your answerarrow_forwardWith the aid of a diagram and using the Keynesian analysis , explain in detail how income and aggregate spending are affected by the government spending and a cut in spending by European firms.arrow_forward
- Consider two standard Keynesian models. In Model 1, there are two types of consumers, Type A,who have low marginal propensities to consume, and Type B, who have high marginalpropensities to consume. In Model 2, there are only Type A consumers. Then, a decrease in theexogenous taxes would lead to higher output in Model 2 than in Model 1arrow_forwardIf the Keynesian consumption function were C = 2,000 + 0.75YD , what would the value of the tax multiplier be, and how much would equilibrium $output/$income, Y, change if taxes were decreased by 200? Group of answer choices A) Tax multiplier = - 4 ; change in Y = + $160 B) Tax multiplier = - 5 ; change in Y = + $1,000. C) Tax multiplier = - 4 ; change in Y = + $800. D) Tax multiplier = - 5 ; change in Y = + $4,000. E) Tax multiplier = - 3 ; change in Y = + $600.arrow_forwardSuppose we have the following information for the simple (fixed r, fixed P, fixed W) Keynesian model. C = 400 + 0.8 I = 310 G = 140 = 400 + 0.8 (Y - T) T = 200, where C is the consumption function, (Y - T) is disposable income, I is investment, G is government spending, and T is taxes. What can you say about the government's budget situation? (Hint: Think about what “G” and “T” stand for.) Group of answer choices A) There is a budget surplus. B) There is a budget deficit. C) None of the other options. D) We cannot say anything about the government budget. E) The budget is balanced.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning