Case s ummar y:A company POM is making and selling pomegranate-based products. The company in ads claimed that it will prevent or reduce heart disease and cancer on daily consumption. Federal Trade Commission(FTC) charged the company for misleading and misrepresentation ads. The company was barred for future ads and affirmed that other advertisements of the company are deceptive. The court affirmed that the benefits in its product required Randomized Controlled Trials result. The court ordered that benefits in Ads should be supported by the evidence to the consumer in a non-misleading way.
To find:The validity of arguments advanced by the company POM.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 24 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
- 1. Qualitative research refers to a. the collection of statistical data b. the collection of society's overall values c. information based on opinions and values d. the analysis of statistical data focusing on opinions e.none of these 2. The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 is divided into five sections. Which section covers the rights of individuals with disabilities in the areas of employment? a.Title I b.Title II c.Title III d.Title IV e.Title V 3. The most common tort in the health and fitness industry is a.negligence b.battery c.reckless misconduct d.defamation e.assault 4. An aspect of the fitness industry evolution is the increased activity by a.private investment groups b.public markets c.the commercial sector d.community investors e.both a and b 5. In many states, unless a written employment contract is signed, employment is considered to be a.employment by day b.statutory employment c.employment at will d.employment under law e.none of these 6. Which of…arrow_forward1a. What are the general principles of consumer protection? 1b. Discuss the nature of and parties in a consumer protection suit. Who can bring a suit and why? 1c. Who is held accountable under the consumer protection laws?arrow_forwardJimmyCorps places several Facebook ads claiming that his magic tonic protects consumers from coronavirus. Harvey places an order for 50 gallons of the magic tonic to protect himself and his family. Meanwhile, the New York Attorney General commences prosecution of JimmyCorps for fraud—his magic tonic is simply a gallon of bleach, and consumers who have purchased it have become gravely ill or died. Still, JimmyCorps sues Harvey when Harvey refuses to pay for the 50 gallons of tonic he ordered. Can a judge force Harvey to pay JimmyCorps? Why or why not? Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forward
- 1. Discuss and compare the functions of regulations, incentive and pricing mechanisms with respect to achieving environmental goals.2. With respect to product safety, what is strict liability, and what older standard does it replace?3. With respect to proprietary information, what is a trade secret, and how does it differ from information that’s patented or copyrighted?4. When employers are gathering information about job applicants or current employees, what is the meaning of informed consent?5. What are the principles of the old system of mercantile capitalism?6. What is a corporation, and what is the principle of limited liability?7. What is an ecosystem, and what is meant by interdependency in an ecosystem?8. List and briefly explain the 4 key features of capitalism.Keep answers short and accurate.arrow_forwardIn late September 2015, Volkswagen found itself in the midst of a firestorm. The company, which captures 70 percent of the U.S. diesel-powered passenger-car market, was caught cheating on diesel emissions tests. Over the past many years, Volkswagen had installed software on more than half a million diesel cars in the United States—and roughly 10.5 million more worldwide—that detected when the cars were undergoing emissions tests and triggered so-called “defeat devices” that temporarily switched operating modes and allowed them to pass the tests. VW diesel autos were found to actually be emitting up to 40 times the allowable levels of nitrogen oxide pollutants. Volkswagen has long pitched its diesel cars as efficient, nonpolluting vehicles. But in 2008, when U.S. rules on diesel exhaust became stricter, VW faced difficulties meeting the new standards and living up to its “clean diesel” advertising promises and image. So, under competitive pressures, it covertly installed the secret…arrow_forwardUsing a domain name that is an identical or similar to the trademark of another is: a) legal because it is a clever marketing ploy. b) legal because it is a fair use. c) legal because it is a safe harbor. d) illegal. 3) Transferring copyrighted music recordings to others, without the copyright owners’ authorization, is: a) goodwill. b) a fair use. c) illegal. d) a license. 4) Discharging an employee who uses social media in a way that violates the employer's stated social media policies is: a) within the employer's rights. b) a violation of the employee's rights. c) a violation of an Internet service provider's rights. d) a violation of the social media's rights. 5) Cybercrime can best be defined as: a) a crime against property. b) not a new type of crime but a new way of committing crime—in cyberspace. c) a crime that necessarily also involves a tort. d) organized crime.arrow_forward
- Wisconsin passes a state law that bans all semi-trucks from carrying double-trailers on roads in our state (see picture below). The state's ostensible reason for passing the law is to reduce accidents on the road. Double-trailers a more likely to be involved in accidents than single-trailer semis. A national trade group representing freight companies sues the state, arguing that the law violates the Dormant Commerce Clause. Would the state law violate the Dormant Commerce Clause? Explain your decision.arrow_forwardAccording to the case FTC v Standard Education, Question 11 options: The Court advocated a change of standard from the ignorant-consumer standard to the reasonable-person standard The Court set a precedent that unless an advertisement makes a obviously false claim, an advertisement is not deceptive The Court advocated a change of standard from the reasonable-person standard to the gullible-consumer standard The rule of caveat emptor should be the guiding principle in deciding consumer fraud casesarrow_forwardA few days before the end of the term of a two-year NDA (nondisclosure agreement) he signed witha startup company related to a possible patent, Frank interviewed with another startup and divulgedinformation covered by the agreement. The interview had been scheduled for a week later, in whichcase it wouldn’t have been an issue, but had been moved up when another job applicant dropped outand the company had an opening for an earlier interview. Frank reasoned that he had met the spiritof the NDA, and a few days early wouldn’t really matter. Besides, as it turned out, the company heinterviewed with wasn’t interested in that information, although they did hire him. What would youhave done if you were Frank?arrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education