The family M operated a business on their lakefront property for more than 40 years. M also used a piece of land belonging to the neighbor F for over 40 years with their permission. F also reminded them several times about the ownership of such a piece of land but the family M sometimes didn’t say anything. The family M asked for permission from neighbor F to grow mow grass on his piece of land and once they apologized neighbor F for forgetting the ski on his land. To find: The validity of claim of Adverse possession by M on F’s land.

Question

Is the job exempt or non-exempt under the (FLSA)? Why or why not?Case 1.Harry Phipps, Senior Professional Sales RepresentativeHarry Phipps was employed by K & K Pharmaceutical Company as a senior professional salesrepresentative. Phipps’ position required him to travel across doctors’ offices and hospitals where hepromoted the benefit of K & K’s drug, Provita, to the prescribing doctors. K & K used this method in thehope that when doctors realized the benefit of Provita, they would prescribe the drug for their patients.By law, Phipps could not sell the drug directly to doctors. The company provided Phipps with a list oftarget doctors, and he was expected to complete ten visits per day, and each doctor had to be visited atleast once a quarter. K & K left the itinerary and method of achieving the targets up to Phipps. However,they did provide Phipps with a budget for the visits. He was also given pre-approved visual aids and hadreceived training in basic “marketing”…

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 26, Problem 5BCP

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The family M operated a business on their lakefront property for more than 40 years. M also used a piece of land belonging to the neighbor F for over 40 years with their permission. F also reminded them several times about the ownership of such a piece of land but the family M sometimes didn’t say anything. The family M asked for permission from neighbor F to grow mow grass on his piece of land and once they apologized neighbor F for forgetting the ski on his land.

To find: The validity of claim of Adverse possession by M on F’s land.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Is the job exempt or non-exempt under the (FLSA)? Why or why not?Case 1.Harry Phipps, Senior Professional Sales RepresentativeHarry Phipps was employed by K & K Pharmaceutical Company as a senior professional salesrepresentative. Phipps’ position required him to travel across doctors’ offices and hospitals where hepromoted the benefit of K & K’s drug, Provita, to the prescribing doctors. K & K used this method in thehope that when doctors realized the benefit of Provita, they would prescribe the drug for their patients.By law, Phipps could not sell the drug directly to doctors. The company provided Phipps with a list oftarget doctors, and he was expected to complete ten visits per day, and each doctor had to be visited atleast once a quarter. K & K left the itinerary and method of achieving the targets up to Phipps. However,they did provide Phipps with a budget for the visits. He was also given pre-approved visual aids and hadreceived training in basic “marketing”…

Ellen, a citizen of California, was seriously injured in an automobile accident while driving in California. She was injured due to the negligence of Sara, a citizen of Arizona, who ran a red light at an intersection. Ellen is seeking 1.5 million in damages. 1. Where may Ellen bring her suit? 2. Discuss the process Ellen would have to follow in order to fully litigate her claim. 3. If Sara is granted summary judgment at the trial court level, what may Ellen do next? Explain her options.

1. Life Company processes information furnished by others to transfer title to real estate from a seller to a buyer. In performing this task for a sale of land from Eren to Armin, the furnished information is mistaken. The contract between Eren and Armin that includes the mistake may be rescinded if the mistake concerns a. a detail on which the parties had a true “meeting of the minds.” b. a fact that is important and central to the contract. c. a third party, such as County Title. d. a term in the contract subject to only one reasonable interpretation.