The associations NCAA and NFHS set a new goal of improving player safety by setting the standards for non-wood baseball bats. Company M makes non-wood bats. Four out of eleven non-wood bats of company M were decertified. Company M filed a suit against NCAA and NFHS under section 1 of the Sherman Act. To find: The trade of M was restrained by NCAA and NFHS under section 1 of the Sherman act.

Question

Business Ethics. Jason Trevor owns a commercial bakery in Blakely. Georgia. that produces a variety of goods sold in grocery stores. Trevor is required by law to perform internal tests on food produced at his plant to check for contamination. On three occasions, the tests of food products containing peanut butter were positive for salmonella contamination. Trevor was not required to report the results to U.S. Food and Drug Administration officials, however, so he did not. Instead. Trevor instructed his employees to simply repeat the tests until the results were negative. Meanwhile, the products that had originally tested positive for salmonella were eventually shipped out to retailers.Five people who ate Trevor's baked goods that year became seriously ill, and one person died from a salmonella infection. Even though Trevor's conduct was legal, was it unethical for him to sell goods that had once tested positive for salmonella? Why or why not? (See Business Ethics.)

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 27, Problem 6BCP

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The associations NCAA and NFHS set a new goal of improving player safety by setting the standards for non-wood baseball bats. Company M makes non-wood bats. Four out of eleven non-wood bats of company M were decertified. Company M filed a suit against NCAA and NFHS under section 1 of the Sherman Act.

To find: The trade of M was restrained by NCAA and NFHS under section 1 of the Sherman act.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Business Ethics. Jason Trevor owns a commercial bakery in Blakely. Georgia. that produces a variety of goods sold in grocery stores. Trevor is required by law to perform internal tests on food produced at his plant to check for contamination. On three occasions, the tests of food products containing peanut butter were positive for salmonella contamination. Trevor was not required to report the results to U.S. Food and Drug Administration officials, however, so he did not. Instead. Trevor instructed his employees to simply repeat the tests until the results were negative. Meanwhile, the products that had originally tested positive for salmonella were eventually shipped out to retailers.Five people who ate Trevor's baked goods that year became seriously ill, and one person died from a salmonella infection. Even though Trevor's conduct was legal, was it unethical for him to sell goods that had once tested positive for salmonella? Why or why not? (See Business Ethics.)

BUSINESS LAW 3 - David Ungar holds a Dunkin’ Donut's franchise. The terms of his franchise agreement require him to use only those ingredients furnished by Dunkin’ Donuts. He is also required to buy its napkins, cups, and so on, with the Dunkin’ Donut's trademark on them. Is this an illegal tying arrangement? What if Dunkin’ Donuts maintains that it needs these requirements to maintain its quality levels on a nationwide basis? [Ungar v. Dunkin’ Donuts of America, Inc., 429 U.S 5 - Hines Cosmetic Co. sold beauty preparations nationally to beauty shops at a standard or fixed- price schedule. Some of the shops were also supplied with a free demonstrator and free advertising materials. The shops that were not supplied with them claimed that giving the free services and materials constituted unlawful price discrimination. Hines replied that there was no price discrimination because it charged everyone the same. What it was giving free was merely a promotional campaign that was not…

Philippine company that has a bad corporate governance.