The company, TFCBP, hired a forty-seven-year-old person, AL, for a warehouse position who was subject to a thirty-day prohibition period. The work performance was evaluated at the end of thirty days period by TFCBP and it decided not to retain AL. The person AL filed a case against the company TFCBP, alleging them of discrimination on the basis of age and race. The company TFCBP filed a summary of judgment motion. The performance of AL was presented as evidence to the court. The motion was granted. The appeal was filed by AL. To Find: The decision of the court in the absence of evidence presented to defend the case.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 3, Problem 3CT

Summary Introduction

Case summary:The company, TFCBP, hired a forty-seven-year-old person, AL, for a warehouse position who was subject to a thirty-day prohibition period. The work performance was evaluated at the end of thirty days period by TFCBP and it decided not to retain AL. The person AL filed a case against the company TFCBP, alleging them of discrimination on the basis of age and race. The company TFCBP filed a summary of judgment motion. The performance of AL was presented as evidence to the court. The motion was granted. The appeal was filed by AL.

To Find:The decision of the court in the absence of evidence presented to defend the case.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

T.W.E., a large manufacturer, prohibited its employees from distributing union leaflets to other employees while on the company’s property. Richard, an employee of T.W.E., disregarded the prohibition and passed out the leaflets before his work shift began. T.W.E. discharged Richard for his actions. Has T.W.E. committed an unfair labor practice? Explain.

Lend Co. discovered that one of its employees, Dana, is an alcoholic. Her manager realized that Dana's alcoholism must be the reason for her absenteeism. To help Dana overcome her alcoholiśm, the employer provided her with counseling services and also asked her to make a firm choice between treatment and discipline. Lend Co. also offered outpatient treatment, and Dana participated in the program without success. When all of these efforts failed, Lend Co. offered to provide inpatient treatment, and Dana refused. Lend Co. fired Dana. According to the courts: O A. Dana has a valid claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act because she willingly participated in the outpatient treatment, even though it did not produce positive results. O B. Lend Co. is not liable under the Americans with Disabilities Act because it offered a reasonable accommodation, and Dana refused. O C. Lend Co, is liable under the Americans with Disabilities Act because it failed to offer Dana time off from…

Which of the following are required for a plaintiff to establish a prima facie case of disability discrimination? Select all that apply. 1. that her employer has 10 or more full time employees 2. that she was forced to work in a hostile work environment. 3. that she is someone who, with or without reasonable accommodation, can perform the “essential functions” of the employment position that such individual holds or desires. 4. that she is disabled 5. that she was subjected to unlawful discrimination because of her disability