Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
17th Edition
ISBN: 9781337094757
Author: Richard A. Mann, Barry S. Roberts
Publisher: Cengage Learning
Question
Chapter 31, Problem 6Q
Summary Introduction

To discuss: Whether person S will get a claim or both L and M should refuse to pay the claim to person S.

Blurred answer
Students have asked these similar questions
Madison and Tilson agree to form a limited partnership with Madison as general partner and Tilson as the limited partner, each to contribute $12,500 as capital. No papers are ever filed, and after ten months the enterprise fails, its liabilities exceeding its assets by $30,000. Creditors of the partnership seek to hold Madison and Tilson personally liable for the $30,000. Explain whether the creditors will prevail.
Anthony and Karen were partners doing business as the Petite Garment Company. Leroy owned a dye plant that did much of the processing for the company. Anthony and Karen decided to offer Leroy an interest in their company, in consideration for which Leroy would contribute his dye plant to the partnership. Leroy accepted the offer and was duly admitted as a partner. At the time he was admitted as a partner, Leroy did not know that the partnership was on the verge of insolvency. About three months after Leroy was admitted to the partnership, a textile firm obtained a judgment against the partnership in the amount of $50,000. This debt represented an unpaid balance that had existed before Leroy was admitted as a partner.The textile firm brought an action to subject the partnership property, including the dye plant, to the satisfaction of its judgment. The complaint also requested that, in the event the judgment was unsatisfied by sale of the partnership property, Leroy’s home be sold and…
Charles and L. W. Clement were brothers who had formed a partnership that lasted forty years until Charles discovered that his brother, who kept the partnership’s books, had made several substantial personal investments with funds improperly withdrawn from the partnership. He then brought an action in equity seeking dissolution of the partnership, appointment of a receiver, and an accounting. Should Charles succeed? Explain.

Chapter 31 Solutions

Smith and Roberson’s Business Law

Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
  • A, B and C were in general partnership business. Because of wrong decision taken by Mr.C the business got losses, which even the business assets cannot cover those liabilities and all of the partners will be subjected for unlimited liabilities. Who will be liable for the business debts and has to use personal property to pay for the losses. Select one: a. Partner B b. Partner C c. Partner A d. All the partners
    VIOLETS Company purchased 5,000 shares of POPPY Company par ₱100 at ₱120 in March 2020 VIOLETS received a share dividend of 1 share for every 5 owned on August 30, 2020. On September 15, 2020, the firm received a cash dividend of ₱10 per share. On October 1, 2020, VIOLETS was granted the right to purchase 1 share at ₱105 for every 4 rights held. The share had a market value of ₱115 and the right had a value of ₱5 on the date the rights were received. On December 15, 2020, the company sold 2,000 rights at ₱7.50 and exercised the remaining rights. What is the average unit cost of the total investment as of December 31, 2020?
    Albert, Betty, and Carol own and operate the Roy Lumber Company, a limited liability partnership (LLP). Each contributed one-third of the capital, and they share equally in the profits and losses. Their LLP agreement provides that all purchases exceeding $2,500 must be authorized in advance by two partners and that only Albert is authorized to draw checks. Unknown to Albert or Carol, Betty purchases on the firm’s account a $5,500 diamond bracelet and a $5,000 forklift and orders $5,000 worth of logs, all from Doug, who operates a jewelry store and is engaged in various activities connected with the lumber business. Before Betty made these purchases, Albert told Doug that Betty is not the log buyer. Albert refuses to pay Doug for Betty’s purchases. Doug calls at the mill to collect, and Albert again refuses to pay him. Doug calls Albert an unprintable name, and Albert then punches Doug in the nose, knocking him out. While Doug is lying unconscious on the ground, an employee of Roy…
  • Anderson and Tallstrom are partners in Rancho Murieta Investors (RMI). Anderson owns 80 percent of RMI; Tallstrom owns the other 20 percent and is the managing partner of RMI. Hellman obtained judgments against Anderson in his individual capacity for more than $440,000. After various unsuccessful attempts to enforce the judgments, Hellman obtained an “Order Charging Debtor John B. Anderson’s Partnership Interest” in RMI. Despite the charging order, Hellman has not received any monies in satisfaction of the judgments because RMI had not generated profits and was not expected to do so in the near future. Explain what Hellman’s rights are with respect to the unsatisfied charging order.
    Theo, a member of TGI partnership, withdrew from the partnership and duly notified the other members. The firm was an at-will partnership and the parties parted amicably, posting a notice in the local newspaper of the dissolution of their firm. Cosmo, a customer who had conducted business with Theo several times, did not see the newspaper notice and was not informed of the dissolution. Later, Theo approached Cosmo concerning a transaction similar to those Cosmo had engaged in before with Theo acting on behalf of TGI. Cosmo placed an order, gave a substantial down payment to Theo, and received a receipt on TGI stationery from him. Theo thereafter absconded with the down payment, and TGI failed to honor the contract. Cosmo sued the other members of TGI partnership. Discuss their potential liability.
    The following statements are true, except * -A limited partner is liable for partnership debts up to the extent of his capital contribution -An industrial partner can also be a capitalist partner at the same time. -An industrial partner who engages in business for himself can be excluded from the partnership. -A capitalist partner may engage in the same line of business as that of the partnership -answer not given   The following partnership accounts represent a liability of a partner to the partnership, except * -Receivable from partner -Loan to partner -Due from partner -all of the above -answer not given   A partner’s capital account is credited for the following transactions, except * -Share in net income -loan from the partner -Original and additional investment -both A and C -answer not given
  • Zenith Steel Company operates a prosperous business. In January, Zenith’s chief executive officer (CEO) and president, Roe, who is also a member of the board, was voted a $1 million bonus by the board of directors for the valuable services he provided to the company during the previous year. Roe receives an annual salary of $850,000 from the company. Black, Inc., a minority shareholder in Zenith Steel Company, brings an appropriate action to enjoin the company from paying the $1 million bonus. Explain whether Black will succeed in its attempt.
    BZ” is a recreational club which was organized to operate golf course for its members with an original authorized capital stock of P100M. The articles of incorporation nor the by laws did not provide for the distribution of dividends although there is a provision that after dissolution, the assets shall be given to a charitable corporation. Which of the following statement is true based on existing This is a stock corporation since its articles of incorporation and by-laws are silent, it is presumed that it can declare dividends. This is a non-stock corporation because the articles of incorporation did not provide for the distribution of dividends. The stockholders or members must amend the articles of incorporation and state clearly whether the corporation is a stock corporation or a non-stock corporation. This is a non-stock corporation because the assets after dissolution are to be given to a charitable institution.
    John Bunker has assets of $130,000 and liabilities of $185,000 owed to nine creditors. Nonetheless, his cash flow is positive, and he is making payment on all of his obligations as they become due. I. M. Flintheart, who is owed $22,000 by Bunker, files an involuntary petition in bankruptcy under Chapter 7 against Bunker. Bunker contests the petition. What result? Explain.
  • The stock in Hotel Management, Inc., a hotel management corporation, was divided equally between two families. For several years, the two families had been unable to agree on or cooperate in the management of the corporation. As a result, no meeting of shareholders or directors had been held for five years. There had been no withdrawal of profits for five years, and last year the hotel operated at a loss. Although the corporation was not insolvent, such a state was imminent because the business was poorly managed and its properties were in need of repair. As a result, the owners of half the stock brought an action in equity for dissolution of the corporation. Will they succeed? Explain.
    Hutchins and O’Neil, as general partners in the Haddon View Investment Co., became limited partners in Car Wash Investments. The general partner in Car Wash was the Minit Man Development Company. Coopers and Lybrand accountants handled the accounting work for both Minit Man and Car Wash. They performed audits and prepared financial statements that allegedly revealed two healthy companies. Nevertheless, both Car Wash and Minit Man went out of business. As a result, Hutchins and O’Neil lost a total of $252,000. They sued Coopers and Lybrand, alleging malpractice, breach of contract, concealment, fraud, and deceit in the accountants’ work for Car Wash and Minit Man. Coopers and Lybrand argued that Hutchins and O’Neil could not sue the firm because Car Wash and Minit Man were the clients, not Hutchins and O’Neil. Were the accountants correct?
    Paul Bunyan is the owner of noncumulative 8 percent preferred stock in the Broadview Corporation, which had no earnings or profits in 2012. In 2013, the corporation had large profits and a surplus from which it might properly have declared dividends. The directors refused to do so, however, instead using the surplus to purchase goods necessary for the corporation’s expanding business. The corporation earned a small profit in 2014. The directors at the end of 2014 declared a 10 percent dividend on the common stock and an 8 percent dividend on the preferred stock without paying preferred dividends for 2013. a. Is Bunyan entitled to dividends for 2012? For 2013? b. Is Bunyan entitled to a dividend of 10 percent rather than 8 percent in 2014?
    • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
    Recommended textbooks for you
  • Understanding Business
    Management
    ISBN:9781259929434
    Author:William Nickels
    Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
    Management (14th Edition)
    Management
    ISBN:9780134527604
    Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter
    Publisher:PEARSON
    Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...
    Management
    ISBN:9781305947412
    Author:Cliff Ragsdale
    Publisher:Cengage Learning
  • Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...
    Management
    ISBN:9780135191798
    Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. Laudon
    Publisher:PEARSON
    Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...
    Management
    ISBN:9780134728391
    Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. Griffin
    Publisher:PEARSON
    Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
    Management
    ISBN:9780134237473
    Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De Cenzo
    Publisher:PEARSON
  • Understanding Business
    Management
    ISBN:9781259929434
    Author:William Nickels
    Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
    Management (14th Edition)
    Management
    ISBN:9780134527604
    Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter
    Publisher:PEARSON
    Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...
    Management
    ISBN:9781305947412
    Author:Cliff Ragsdale
    Publisher:Cengage Learning
    Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...
    Management
    ISBN:9780135191798
    Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. Laudon
    Publisher:PEARSON
    Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...
    Management
    ISBN:9780134728391
    Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. Griffin
    Publisher:PEARSON
    Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
    Management
    ISBN:9780134237473
    Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De Cenzo
    Publisher:PEARSON