A law was enacted by the state legislature that required the motorcycle operators or passengers to wear a protective helmet. A licensed motorcycle operator, JA, filed a case to declare the act as unconstitutional. JA emphasized that the act violated the equal protection act as it discriminates between motorcyclist and motorist. To find: The reason for not raising the substantive due process clause and for raising the equal protection clause.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: A law was enacted by the state legislature that required the motorcycle operators or passengers to wear a protective helmet. A licensed motorcycle operator, JA, filed a case to declare the act as unconstitutional. JA emphasized that the act violated the equal protection act as it discriminates between motorcyclist and motorist.

To find: The reason for not raising the substantive due process clause and for raising the equal protection clause.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The substantive due process clause is focused on the content of legislation and not on the fairness of the procedure. Therefore, it was not applied to the given case.

The issue of equal protection clause is raised as there is a possible discrimination between motorcycle operators and motorists. It is because the law was applied to only a particular set of members. Therefore, the issue of equal protection was raised because both, the motorcyclists and motorists are considered to be on an equal platform.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

Stephen Glass made himself infamous as a dishonest journalist by fabricating material for more than forty articles for The New Republic and other publications. At the time, he was a law student at Georgetown University. Once suspicions were aroused, Glass tried to avoid detection. Later, Glass applied for admission to the California bar. The California Supreme Court denied his application, citing “numerous instances of dishonesty” during his “rehabilitation” following the exposure of his misdeeds. How do these circumstances underscore the importance of ethics?

The Case of Baylor University Patty Crawford, the Title IX coordinator at Baylor from November 2014 to October 2016, was hired to coordinate the institution’s Title IX compliance when this case took place (Baylor University, n.d.). Like all Title IX coordinators, Crawford’s role was a comprehensive administrative role that bears the responsibility of ensuring that campuses prevent and respond to gender discrimination, including sexual misconduct. This role spans duties related to grievance process management, victim assistance, organization management, and climate management (Lake, 2017). In addition to managing the institution’s compliance, Title IX coordinators also craft comprehensive training and awareness strategies to ensure students, employees, and other campus stakeholders are aware of how to identify and report sexual misconduct and what resources are available to students regardless of whether they choose to proceed with the grievance process. Crawford alleged that she was…

BUSINESS LAW 101 I am trying to do an I.R.A.C. Brief a Case from business Law. So far I have this: David KRASNER, Plaintiff, v. HSH NORDBANK AG, and Roland Kiser in his personal and official capacities, Defendants. United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 7, 2010. 680 F. Supp. 2d 502 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) FACTS David KRASNER is suing HSH NORDBANK AG, and Roland Kiser, his employer, for sexual discrimination under Title VII under the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Krasner clams Sexual Harassment towards women runs rampant in his work environment. No violation was found from the investigation that was conducted. After which he was fired prompting him to request a right to sue letter from the EEOC. He was granted the letter and proceeded with the lawsuit. ISSUE A person must be a victim of Sexual Harassment in order to clam and sue for sexual harassment. MY QUESTION: (The Aplication part of it.) Below is the link to the Case. This part is asking…

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: A law was enacted by the state legislature that required the motorcycle operators or passengers to wear a protective helmet. A licensed motorcycle operator, JA, filed a case to declare the act as unconstitutional. JA emphasized that the act violated the equal protection act as it discriminates between motorcyclist and motorist.

To find: The reason for not raising the substantive due process clause and for raising the equal protection clause.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The substantive due process clause is focused on the content of legislation and not on the fairness of the procedure. Therefore, it was not applied to the given case.

The issue of equal protection clause is raised as there is a possible discrimination between motorcycle operators and motorists. It is because the law was applied to only a particular set of members. Therefore, the issue of equal protection was raised because both, the motorcyclists and motorists are considered to be on an equal platform.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: A law was enacted by the state legislature that required the motorcycle operators or passengers to wear a protective helmet. A licensed motorcycle operator, JA, filed a case to declare the act as unconstitutional. JA emphasized that the act violated the equal protection act as it discriminates between motorcyclist and motorist.

To find: The reason for not raising the substantive due process clause and for raising the equal protection clause.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The substantive due process clause is focused on the content of legislation and not on the fairness of the procedure. Therefore, it was not applied to the given case.

The issue of equal protection clause is raised as there is a possible discrimination between motorcycle operators and motorists. It is because the law was applied to only a particular set of members. Therefore, the issue of equal protection was raised because both, the motorcyclists and motorists are considered to be on an equal platform.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: A law was enacted by the state legislature that required the motorcycle operators or passengers to wear a protective helmet. A licensed motorcycle operator, JA, filed a case to declare the act as unconstitutional. JA emphasized that the act violated the equal protection act as it discriminates between motorcyclist and motorist.

To find: The reason for not raising the substantive due process clause and for raising the equal protection clause.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The substantive due process clause is focused on the content of legislation and not on the fairness of the procedure. Therefore, it was not applied to the given case.

The issue of equal protection clause is raised as there is a possible discrimination between motorcycle operators and motorists. It is because the law was applied to only a particular set of members. Therefore, the issue of equal protection was raised because both, the motorcyclists and motorists are considered to be on an equal platform.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 4, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: A law was enacted by the state legislature that required the motorcycle operators or passengers to wear a protective helmet. A licensed motorcycle operator, JA, filed a case to declare the act as unconstitutional. JA emphasized that the act violated the equal protection act as it discriminates between motorcyclist and motorist.

To find: The reason for not raising the substantive due process clause and for raising the equal protection clause.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The substantive due process clause is focused on the content of legislation and not on the fairness of the procedure. Therefore, it was not applied to the given case.

The issue of equal protection clause is raised as there is a possible discrimination between motorcycle operators and motorists. It is because the law was applied to only a particular set of members. Therefore, the issue of equal protection was raised because both, the motorcyclists and motorists are considered to be on an equal platform.

Answer 6

Chapter 4, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: A law was enacted by the state legislature that required the motorcycle operators or passengers to wear a protective helmet. A licensed motorcycle operator, JA, filed a case to declare the act as unconstitutional. JA emphasized that the act violated the equal protection act as it discriminates between motorcyclist and motorist.

To find: The reason for not raising the substantive due process clause and for raising the equal protection clause.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The substantive due process clause is focused on the content of legislation and not on the fairness of the procedure. Therefore, it was not applied to the given case.

The issue of equal protection clause is raised as there is a possible discrimination between motorcycle operators and motorists. It is because the law was applied to only a particular set of members. Therefore, the issue of equal protection was raised because both, the motorcyclists and motorists are considered to be on an equal platform.

Answer 7

Chapter 4, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: A law was enacted by the state legislature that required the motorcycle operators or passengers to wear a protective helmet. A licensed motorcycle operator, JA, filed a case to declare the act as unconstitutional. JA emphasized that the act violated the equal protection act as it discriminates between motorcyclist and motorist.

To find: The reason for not raising the substantive due process clause and for raising the equal protection clause.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The substantive due process clause is focused on the content of legislation and not on the fairness of the procedure. Therefore, it was not applied to the given case.

The issue of equal protection clause is raised as there is a possible discrimination between motorcycle operators and motorists. It is because the law was applied to only a particular set of members. Therefore, the issue of equal protection was raised because both, the motorcyclists and motorists are considered to be on an equal platform.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

Ch. 4 - Prob. 1RE Ch. 4 - Prob. 2RE Ch. 4 - Prob. 3RE Ch. 4 - Prob. 4RE Ch. 4 - Prob. 1IS Ch. 4 - Prob. 2IS Ch. 4 - Prob. 1BS Ch. 4 - Prob. 2BS Ch. 4 - Prob. 3BCP Ch. 4 - Prob. 4BCP

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 4 Solutions