The person RB had applied to the University of Kansas School of Law, wherein during the admission process he knowingly provided false information regarding his criminal history. In the past, he had been convicted of domestic battery and driving under influence. He was accepted in the University but his criminal background was found out. Later, he was notified of the intention of dismissal and granted an opportunity to explain himself in writing, but he asked for a hearing. The hearing was denied and he was dismissed from the University. To explain : The action of the school to dismiss the person RB denying him due process.

Question

Stephen Glass made himself infamous as a dishonest journalist by fabricating material for more than forty articles for The New Republic and other publications. At the time, he was a law student at Georgetown University. Once suspicions were aroused, Glass tried to avoid detection. Later, Glass applied for admission to the California bar. The California Supreme Court denied his application, citing “numerous instances of dishonesty” during his “rehabilitation” following the exposure of his misdeeds. How do these circumstances underscore the importance of ethics?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 7BCP

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person RB had applied to the University of Kansas School of Law, wherein during the admission process he knowingly provided false information regarding his criminal history. In the past, he had been convicted of domestic battery and driving under influence. He was accepted in the University but his criminal background was found out. Later, he was notified of the intention of dismissal and granted an opportunity to explain himself in writing, but he asked for a hearing. The hearing was denied and he was dismissed from the University.

To explain : The action of the school to dismiss the person RB denying him due process.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Stephen Glass made himself infamous as a dishonest journalist by fabricating material for more than forty articles for The New Republic and other publications. At the time, he was a law student at Georgetown University. Once suspicions were aroused, Glass tried to avoid detection. Later, Glass applied for admission to the California bar. The California Supreme Court denied his application, citing “numerous instances of dishonesty” during his “rehabilitation” following the exposure of his misdeeds. How do these circumstances underscore the importance of ethics?

Tyrone, a U.S. citizen, works for U.S. Oil at its production plant in Iraq. Tyrone has been with U.S. Oil for fifteen years and has always received excellent evaluations. Tyrone applies for a promotion with U.S. Oil to a supervisory role but is not hired for the position. The person hired for the position has been with the company for only two years and is much younger than Tyrone, who is forty-five. Can Tyrone sue U.S. Oil under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, even though he is not working within the United States? a)Yes, Tyrone can, because employees working abroad for U.S. employers are protected under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. b) No, Tyrone can’t, because any lawsuit brought by Tyrone would have to be under Iraqi law. c) No, Tyrone can’t, because employees working abroad for U.S. employers are not protected under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.

Answer the question: Ahmed is an employee of Bristol Manufacturing Company. Bristol manufactures plastics, which creates large amounts of toxic waste that must then be disposed of. Ahmed is responsible for making sure this toxic waste is properly disposed of. To cut costs, Ahmed decides to divert the liquid waste into a local stream, instead of properly disposing of it. This is a direct violation of the Clean Water Act, a national law that protects the United States’ waterways. Sanford is the director of the division in which Ahmed works and knows that Ahmed is doing this. When the authorities discover Ahmed’s unlawful actions, can Bristol be held criminally liable? a) Bristol cannot be held criminally liable, even if Sanford knew of Ahmed’s actions. b)Bristol can be held criminally responsible if Sanford knew of Ahmed’s criminal actions.