Concept explainers
INTERPRET DATA Look at the two graphs in Figure 52-21. In which experiment did the parentals in the experimental group guard the eggs more closely? In which experiment did the experimental parentals guard the young more closely? Account for these differences.
RESULTS:
Experiment 1: As indicated on the y-axis, which measures level of parental care, parentals reduced their level of guarding the eggs. Eight of the males in the experimental group abandoned their nests, and egg defense was significantly lower in this group compared with that in the control group. However, after eggs hatched, there was little difference in parental care of the young between the two groups.
Experiment 2: During the egg phase, there was little difference in level of parental care between experimental and control groups. However, after eggs hatched, the experimental parentals significantly decreased their level of guarding the nest.
CONCLUSION: Male bluegill sunfish adjust their level of parental care according to their level of perceived paternity.
In Experiment 1, parentals provided less care when they perceived that the eggs may have been fertilized by sneaker males. After the eggs hatched, olfactory cues indicated that the offspring were indeed their own, and their level of care increased.
In Experiment 2, parentals cared for the eggs even though some had been swapped. However, after they hatched, olfactory cues from the offspring indicated that they were not the parental’s own offspring. The level of parental care decreased significantly.
SOURCE: B.D. Neff, Nature, Vol. 422 (April 17, 2003): 716–719.
Figure 52-21 Decisions about parental care
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 52 Solutions
Biology (MindTap Course List)
- Discuss the costs and benefits of allomothering behavior, and describe the conditions under which the frequency of allomaternal behavior varies across different primates. References are the books "Primate Behavioral Ecology" by Karen Strier and "Planet Without Apes" by Craig Stanfordarrow_forwardYou were given two examples of learning in class. One related to wasps using landmarks to find nesting sites. The other related to mate choice in birds where the females were exposed to potential mates with artificial crests on their heads. What is the difference in the learning between the two studies? Group of answer choices the wasp study looked at the relatedness among individuals doing the learning both studies demonstrated that the behavior was purely genetic with no learning involved the bird study studied learning and development, permanent changes in behavior as a result of juvenile experience the wasp study studied learning and development, permanent changes in behavior as a result of juvenile experiencearrow_forwardWhich of the following is an example of a question about mechanism (not function)? A. What stimuli triggers a mother bird to feed her nestling? B. How does parental care benefit the mother's inclusive fitness? C. Why do some species have parental care but not others? D. Do mother birds get better at caring for their offspring over time?arrow_forward
- As a follow‑up experiment, researchers placed the Daphnia that were exposed to the Notonecta chemical cues into a tank without chemical cues. The Daphnia reproduced asexually, and the offspring developed in the tank without chemical cues. Predict the relative size of the crest height and width of offspring raised in the tank without chemical cues as compared to the parent Daphnia.arrow_forwardThe digger bee’s “postcopulatory courtship” consists of elaborate tactile stimulation that the male provides his partner after she has accepted his sperm. Why is this behavior a Darwinian puzzle, and what might its adaptive value be? Dont' write from any online source.arrow_forwardFemale parasitoid wasps search for insect hosts in which to lay eggs, and they can often discriminate among individual hosts that are more or less suitable for their offspring. Behavioral ecologists have asked whether or not the wasps’ willingness to lay eggs in less suitable hosts varies with the female’s age. On the basis of life history theory, what pattern of change would you predict? Does life history theory make any other predictions about animal behavior?arrow_forward
- why altruistic behavior represents and evolutionary paradox. What is the primary hypothesis for the mechanism that led to the evolution of alarm calling?arrow_forwardWhich of the following questions is most closely associated with anultimate cause of a behavior?a. How does a squid alter its color to blend in with its environment?b. How does a hummingbird’s body shape influence its ability tohover?c. How do alarm calls affect prairie dog fitness?d. Which cues do monarch butterflies use during migration?arrow_forwardUse Verbal description of results from graph and then Interpret the graph for Exclusive range sccenario in foraging lab. The interpretations must include Were the results expected and Did they support the hypotheses? If so, state the biological significance of the results from graph. If the results deviated significantly from expected results, discuss the hypotheses onthe basis of expected results and include an explanation of why this might be so. Lastly, state the conclusions drawn from the experiment and their biological relevance. Hypothesis: In the context of exclusive ranges, the foraging times would be significantly affected by the introduction of competition, as opposed to territoriality. This increased competition was expected to deplete food resources and result in harassment by competing individuals.arrow_forward
- Use Verbal description of results from graph and then Interpret the graph for Pre camouflage sccenario in foraging lab. The interpretations must include Were the results expected and Did they support the hypotheses? If so, state the biological significance of the results from graph. If the results deviated significantly from expected results, discuss the hypotheses onthe basis of expected results and include an explanation of why this might be so. Lastly, state the conclusions drawn from the experiment and their biological relevance. Hypothesis: In the scenario involving prey camouflage, the hypothesis is that species taking extended periods to forage, especially novice foragers, would be at heightened risk of predation due to their prolonged exposure.arrow_forwardWhich research question does not refer to proximate causes of behavior? a.) How do rhesus macaques find their food? b.) how do pigeons that are experimentally displaced find their way back to their home loft? c.) How does dispersal affect the survival of Belding's ground squirrels? d.) Do mother goats learn the odor of their offspring? e.) How do hummingbirds “know” when it is time to return to their overwintering grounds?arrow_forwardUse Verbal description of results from graph and then Interpret the graph for Pre camouflage sccenario in foraging lab. The interpretations must include Were the results expected and Did they support the hypotheses? If so, state the biological significance of the results from graph. If the results deviated significantly from expected results, discuss the hypotheses onthe basis of expected results and include an explanation of why this might be so. Lastly, state the conclusions drawn from the experiment and their biological relevance. Hypothesis: n the scenario involving prey camouflage, the hypothesis is that prey species will exhibit seasonal variations in their choice of beans for consumption based on the available background vegetation, with a preference for pinto beans during the first half of winter when they are more visually similar to their surroundings and a preference for pea beans during the second half of winter when they better match the changing background vegetation.arrow_forward
- Biology (MindTap Course List)BiologyISBN:9781337392938Author:Eldra Solomon, Charles Martin, Diana W. Martin, Linda R. BergPublisher:Cengage LearningBiology: The Dynamic Science (MindTap Course List)BiologyISBN:9781305389892Author:Peter J. Russell, Paul E. Hertz, Beverly McMillanPublisher:Cengage LearningBiology Today and Tomorrow without Physiology (Mi...BiologyISBN:9781305117396Author:Cecie Starr, Christine Evers, Lisa StarrPublisher:Cengage Learning