An individual named Su filed a lawsuit against a distributor company Sc, for distributing “unreasonably dangerous product”- a utility lighter. The person S, who lived with her four daughters A, V, Je, and Ja, alleged that the lighter she bought from Sc company was “unreasonably dangerous” as it caused her three-year-old daughter Je’s death. To find: The expectation applied to this case is of Su or Je.

Question

Sample Question and Answer: Question: James was elderly, disabled, and afflicted with very bad arthritis. One day, his 20 year-old neighbor pulled James’s chair out from under James. The girl said she didn’t mean to hurt him. James was not amused and sued the girl for damages. Will James likely be successful? Yes_____ No_____ Reason [Please state the rule(s) of law and your analysis] Answer: James would likely win for the tort of battery which is the intentional harmful or offensive touching of another (the “rule of law”). Analysis: Jokes and pranks are capable of resulting in battery. The chair was pulled out intentionally, which caused offensive contact between James’s body and the floor, in that, the chair was arguably within James’s zone of personal bodily integrity and, thus, an extension of his body. The fact that James was not physically injured is irrelevant. All that matters is that the girl intended the act or knew with substantial certainty of the consequences…

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 7, Problem 9BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: An individual named Su filed a lawsuit against a distributor company Sc, for distributing “unreasonably dangerous product”- a utility lighter. The person S, who lived with her four daughters A, V, Je, and Ja, alleged that the lighter she bought from Sc company was “unreasonably dangerous” as it caused her three-year-old daughter Je’s death.

To find:The expectation applied to this case is of Su or Je.

(b)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

An individual Su filed a lawsuit against s distributor company Sc for distributing “unreasonably dangerous product”- a utility lighter. The person S, who lived with her four daughters A, V, Je, and Ja, alleged that the lighter she bought from Sc company was “unreasonably dangerous” as the lighter caused her three-year-old daughter Je’s death.

To Explain : How the court should rule.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Sample Question and Answer: Question: James was elderly, disabled, and afflicted with very bad arthritis. One day, his 20 year-old neighbor pulled James’s chair out from under James. The girl said she didn’t mean to hurt him. James was not amused and sued the girl for damages. Will James likely be successful? Yes_____ No_____ Reason [Please state the rule(s) of law and your analysis] Answer: James would likely win for the tort of battery which is the intentional harmful or offensive touching of another (the “rule of law”). Analysis: Jokes and pranks are capable of resulting in battery. The chair was pulled out intentionally, which caused offensive contact between James’s body and the floor, in that, the chair was arguably within James’s zone of personal bodily integrity and, thus, an extension of his body. The fact that James was not physically injured is irrelevant. All that matters is that the girl intended the act or knew with substantial certainty of the consequences…

For years, Delaney has lived in a house on Shiflet Street that has a 15-foot setback, which was legal when it was built. Zoning regulations changed to now require a 20-foot setback in her neighborhood. Her home isn't hurting anyone, so Delaney was allowed to keep her home the way it is. What is this an example of? illegal nonconforming use special exception legal nonconforming use buffer zoning

FAMILY OF KUGA VICTIM TO BRING CLASS-ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST FORDThe family of Reshall Jimmy, who died when his Ford Kuga burst into flames, will be pursuinga class-action lawsuit against the vehicle manufacturer. The family’s lawyer, Rod Montano,announced the expected lawsuit during a briefing at the National Press Club on Tuesday(January 17, 2017). Ford announced on Monday that it was recalling the vehicles. In December2015, the automaker released a statement after several Kuga’s caught fire. It notified ownersthat it was investigating reports of engine fires in that model and asked them to take theirvehicle to their dealer for a maintenance check.Still no closureFord has come up with excuses to protect their brand instead of giving the family closure, saysa relative of Reshall Jimmy, who died when his Ford Kuga caught fire in December 2015.Rushall's brother, Kaveen Jimmy said on Monday following Ford’s press briefing in Pretoria:“They have not been doing the right thing… all of the…