Microeconomics
13th Edition
ISBN: 9781337617406
Author: Roger A. Arnold
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 7.3, Problem 2ST
To determine
Explain the endowment effect.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
Rosa received a corgi pillow as a raffle prize; she would have been willing to pay $18 to buy it herself. Based on the endowment effect, we would expect Rosa to be willing to sell the pillow.
what does it mean when we say changing the endowment? (in economics term)
eCONOMIC
Which of the following scenarios best illustrates the endowment effect? Question 14 options: Sam buys a piece of art for $1,000 but refuses to sell it for anything less than $2,000. John buys a new bicycle for $500 but is willing to sell it for $300 if he needs to. Rachel gets a free concert ticket but is willing to sell it for $40 if she can't go. Susan receives a gift card for $50 but is willing to trade it for two gift cards worth $25 each.
Chapter 7 Solutions
Microeconomics
Ch. 7.1 - Prob. 1STCh. 7.1 - Prob. 2STCh. 7.1 - Prob. 3STCh. 7.2 - Prob. 1STCh. 7.2 - Prob. 2STCh. 7.3 - Prob. 1STCh. 7.3 - Prob. 2STCh. 7 - Prob. 1QPCh. 7 - Prob. 2QPCh. 7 - Prob. 3QP
Ch. 7 - Prob. 4QPCh. 7 - Prob. 5QPCh. 7 - Prob. 6QPCh. 7 - Prob. 7QPCh. 7 - Prob. 8QPCh. 7 - Prob. 9QPCh. 7 - Prob. 10QPCh. 7 - Prob. 11QPCh. 7 - Prob. 12QPCh. 7 - Prob. 13QPCh. 7 - Prob. 14QPCh. 7 - Prob. 15QPCh. 7 - Prob. 16QPCh. 7 - Prob. 1WNGCh. 7 - Prob. 2WNGCh. 7 - Prob. 3WNGCh. 7 - Prob. 4WNGCh. 7 - Prob. 5WNGCh. 7 - Prob. 6WNGCh. 7 - Prob. 7WNG
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- What is agent theory?arrow_forwardFor the rest of this question consider a two goods economy where Kim and Jung can trade Ferraris (good x) and VR headsets (good y) with each other. Kim and Jung both enjoy driving Ferraris and having more VR headsets (so more friends can play the same game). They start at the same (high) level of income. Kim has an initial endowment of (x0k, y0k) = (10,30) and Jung has an initial endowment of (x0j, y0j) = (30,10) d) Assume that a social planner could redistribute initial wealth (the amounts of ? and ? that Kim and Jung have). Can they reallocate resources so that Kim and Jung reach the allocation (Xk, Yk) = (20,20) and (Xj, Yj) = (20,20) as a general equilibrium (i.e. post-trade) allocation? Can the social planner redistribute resources to make the allocation where Jung owns all the resources in the economy a general equilibrium allocation?arrow_forwardDo you think Pareto Efficiency is enough to explain welfare economics?arrow_forward
- For the rest of this question consider a two goods economy where Kim and Jung can trade Ferraris (good x) and VR headsets (good y) with each other. Kim and Jung both enjoy driving Ferraris and having more VR headsets (so more friends can play the same game). They start at the same (high) level of income. Kim has an initial endowment of (x0k, y0k) = (10,30) and Jung has an initial endowment of (x0j, y0j) = (30,10) c) Assume that Kim has preferences Uk (Xk, Yk) = 3Xk + 3Yk and Jung has preferences Uj (Xj, Yj) = Xj + 3Yj. Will Kim and Jung trade? Calculate the general equilibrium allocation for Kim and Jung. Compute the utility at the endowment point and at the general equilibrium allocation. Is the new allocation on the contract curve?arrow_forwardWhat is the endowment effect? Question 7 options: The tendency of people to be willing to sell a good they already own even if they are offered a price that is greater than the price they would be willing to pay to buy the good if they didn't already own it The tendency of people to be unwilling to sell a good they already own even if they are offered a price that is greater than the price they would be willing to pay to buy the good if they didn't already own it The tendency of people to be unwilling to sell a good they already own even if they are offered a price that is less than the price they would be willing to pay to buy the good if they didn't already own it The tendency of people to be willing to sell a good they do not own even if they are offered a price that is greater than the price they would be willing to pay to buy the good if they didn't already own itarrow_forwardWrite the two views of the basis for determining the social discount rate?arrow_forward
- Define the Fisher effect. To what extent do empirical tests confirm that the Fisher effect exists in practice?arrow_forwardConsider a market with M= 2 consumers and L = 2 goods. The preferences of each consumer are u₁(x₁) = min (x₁, x2} (6) U₂(x2) = X1X2 (7) Draw the Edgeworth box for this economy, where endowments are ₁ = (0,1) and ₂ = (1,0). Be sure to label the budget constraint, endowment point, equilibrium price ratio, equilibrium allocation, and the indifference curves of each consumer. Please do fast ASAP fastarrow_forwardFor the rest of this question consider a two goods economy where Kim and Jung can trade Ferraris (good x) and VR headsets (good y) with each other. Kim and Jung both enjoy driving Ferraris and having more VR headsets (so more friends can play the same game). They start at the same (high) level of income. Kim has an initial endowment of (x0k, y0k) = (10,30) and Jung has an initial endowment of (x0j, y0j) = (30,10) a) Illustrate the initial endowment in an Edgeworth box. Clearly label the axes and explain the dimensions of the box. Show the indifference curve each of them is on at the endowment point. b) Consider an allocation where Kim gets (xk, yk) = (40,40) and Jung gets the remaining Ferraris and VR headsets. Show where this point is in the Edgeworth box. Is this allocation Pareto efficient? Is it equitable? How likely is this to arise in practice?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning