Interpretation:
The relation of NIMBY argument with productivity and sustainability of a project.
Concept Introduction:
NIMBY is a lack of acceptance of a new facility by local residents citing the environmental sustainability of the project. It may be a grass-root political effort to block the planned location of a facility by a local area resident.
Explanation of Solution
Every planned location for a project although having all favorable factors could face potential roadblocks from its local resident. NIMBY is a lack of acceptance of a new facility by local residents citing the environmental sustainability of the project. It may be a grass-root political effort to block the planned location of a facility by local area residents. In such cases, people oppose development in their vicinity while they may not necessarily be against similar development elsewhere. Sometimes people are against the potentially hazardous impact on the local environment due to industrial waste, change in the scenic landscape of the area, potential demographic change due to the new facility, etc. Factories, shopping malls, mental health facilities, highways, wind turbines, prisons, etc are all examples of new facilities whose potential location might create a substantial NIMBY problem.
Because of this NIMBY argument, a most prime location for a project may not be viable and will have productivity issues. The project will have to compromise on productivity when the secondary location is finalized or the project may not be implemented itself.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 8 Solutions
Practical Operations Management
- Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?arrow_forwardScenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?arrow_forwardDescribe the meaning of sustainability and how it's actually applies in a business ?arrow_forward
- What whys by using an eco-map could nimpact your relationship with the character (wallis) in the movie "Beast of the Southern Wild) by Doris Betts?arrow_forwardCurrently, none of the company’s competitors has a production facility in Latin America. To reach this untapped market, the chief executive officer (CEO) is considering opening an additional manufacturing facility in Latin America. The operations management team has been directed to analyze the factors (including global) that need to be considered when deciding where to locate a new facility and report the recommended factors for consideration to the CEO. The team will also need to analyze how a life cycle assessment will help the company reduce its ecological impact, including making a case to the CEO that the benefits are worth funding the effort. How will a furniture company Increase its customer base in the untapped Latin American market? Reducing the company’s ecological footprint? Reducing production cost and Enabling multicultural collaboration opportunities between the operation’s functional teams (marketing and sales, finance, and operations) in the U.S. and Latin America…arrow_forwardHow can I describe design elements, technology, and equipment that you could use to enhance the environmental sustainability of a facility? Noting that “sustainability” here refers toenvironmental responsibility – greenness –, not fiscal performance or structural soundness.arrow_forward
- Topic: “What are some causes of rising food prices and the challenges faced by rural farmers in Mt. Royal, Carriacou.” A. Based on the topic above, what are the theory/theories that provide an explanation for the problem you are studying?arrow_forwardList and Expalin any sustainable practices being currently implemented in the resort discussing the pros and cons to the practices.arrow_forwardHow would they describe production technology in terms of sustainability?arrow_forward
- 19) What is the EBM, if total basic employment is 128,500 and total employment is 350.000? 20) What does the EBM indicate in question 19? 21) Based on question 19, If the population is 798,112, what is the PER. 22) What does the PER indicate?arrow_forwardWhat are three high-risk industries in sustainability? Name them and give one reason why each of them is high risk.arrow_forwardTOYOTA SA TO INVEST OVER R4BN IN CAR ASSEMBLY AND PARTS Toyota SA Motors (TSAM) has announced a R4.28bn investment in local vehicle assembly and partssupply. Speaking at the company’s annual State of the Motor Industry address at Kyalami on Thursday,president and CEO Andrew Kirby said the lion’s share of R2.43bn would go towards the production ofa new passenger-car model from October 2021 at the Prospecton plant in KwaZulu-Natal.The new car, which he did not name, will replace the Corolla model line that will end in 2020. TSAMalso announced it will build a Toyota Hybrid Synergy Drive vehicle, in a first for the continent. Kirbysaid the investment will inject R2.85bn a year into the South African economy and create about 1,500new jobs. He noted that the deal was made possible due to industrial policy certainty in the form ofthe Automotive Production and Development Programme, the government’s incentive plan for themotor industry. The next phase of the APDP runs from 2021 to 2035.TSAM…arrow_forward
- Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage Learning