The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781305967304
Author: Frank B. Cross, Roger LeRoy Miller
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 8, Problem 3RE
Summary Introduction
Case summary: Two persons, T and X had designed and manufactured a software, Hallowed for a videogame with the help of their friend, B. But before the launch of this software, a new videogame, halo 2, was released. The look, feel and source code of the two products are same.
To find: The possibility that the persons T and X sue for copyright infringement.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
BUSINESS LAW
Harvey plans to steal money from the company rainy-day fund. Before he can act on his plans, he is fired from his job. While cleaning out Harvey’s desk, Sue, his boss, finds Harvey’s plans to steal the rainy-day money. Under the ruling in Faulkner:
True or false ?
Lucy cannot stand the fact that her ex-husband, Ethan, is about to get remarried. After all, it was a horrible breakup, and Ethan was really mean to her. Lucy decides to get her revenge by telling Ethan’s employer that Ethan stole large amounts of money from his previous employer, even though Lucy knows it is not true. If Lucy follows through on her plan, she will have:
a) not committed the tort of defamation because the statement would not harm Ethan’s reputation.
b) committed the tort of defamation because it is an untrue statement intended to harm Ethan’s reputation, and she stated it to another person.
c) not committed the tort of defamation, because she only made the statement to one person.
Paula Plaintiff owns Paula’s Boutique, one of the most popular stores in town. William Wicked owns the store next to Paula’s Boutique. William has been jealous of Paula’s success. William, in an effort to increase his own business, begins to tell his customers that Paula is dishonest and unethical. William even puts a sign in his front window warning potential customers not to shop at Paula’s Boutique because of her deceitful and unethical practices.
Paula is upset when she finds out what William has been doing. Paula has always been honest and ethical with her customers and now her business is suffering because of William’s dishonesty. Paula decides that something must be done about this situation.
What advice would you give Paula?
Discuss the possible tort claim Paula might have against William. Be sure to include the elements of the tort and relate those elements to the scenario.
If Paula decides to pursue a claim against William, should she consider a lawsuit, mediation, or…
Chapter 8 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Stephen Glass made himself infamous as a dishonest journalist by fabricating material for more than forty articles for The New Republic and other publications. At the time, he was a law student at Georgetown University. Once suspicions were aroused, Glass tried to avoid detection. Later, Glass applied for admission to the California bar. The California Supreme Court denied his application, citing “numerous instances of dishonesty” during his “rehabilitation” following the exposure of his misdeeds. How do these circumstances underscore the importance of ethics?arrow_forwardAnswer the question: Ahmed is an employee of Bristol Manufacturing Company. Bristol manufactures plastics, which creates large amounts of toxic waste that must then be disposed of. Ahmed is responsible for making sure this toxic waste is properly disposed of. To cut costs, Ahmed decides to divert the liquid waste into a local stream, instead of properly disposing of it. This is a direct violation of the Clean Water Act, a national law that protects the United States’ waterways. Sanford is the director of the division in which Ahmed works and knows that Ahmed is doing this. When the authorities discover Ahmed’s unlawful actions, can Bristol be held criminally liable? a) Bristol cannot be held criminally liable, even if Sanford knew of Ahmed’s actions. b)Bristol can be held criminally responsible if Sanford knew of Ahmed’s criminal actions.arrow_forwardMr. Chan works in Malaysia but is a citizen of Singapore where his company is organized andheadquartered. Mr. Chan is an expatriate, who is a citizen of the company's home countryworking in a foreign country. Ms. Hamidah is Mr. Chan's executive secretary in Malaysia, butunlike Mr. Chan, she is a citizen of Malaysia and is considered a host-country national. Sheis an employee hired by a foreign company to work in her own country. Mr. Alex works for thesame company as Mr. Chan and Ms. Hamidah in Malaysia, but he is an Australian. Anemployee like Mr. Alex who is a citizen of one country but works in another country for acompany that is headquartered in a third country, is called a third-country national. Mr.Chan, Ms. Hamidah, and Mr. Alex are examples of MNC’s staffing approach. MNCs facedifferent challenges with employee selection leading them to use certain staffing approaches.The international HR department must have an innovative idea about the skills and availabilityof human…arrow_forward
- Ganny has an idea and hires a photographer to execute his idea, Ganny pays for his or her expenses including models, film, processing, assistants, and special equipment, Does the copyright belong to Ganny? Explain your answer.arrow_forwardLefa is a Junior Security Guard at Company X. He applies for a promotion and he is informed that for him to be considered for a possible promotion, he will have to cut his dreadlocks. However, Lefa is a Rastafarian and he does not cut his dreadlocks due to his religious beliefs. Thabo is hired instead because Lefa refused to cut his dreadlocks. Answer the following questions: 4.3.1. Outline the dispute resolution procedure that Lefa should follow to refer an unfair discrimination dispute against his employer Identify and explain a potential justification that the employer may use for his choice to hire Thabo in these circumstances. Discuss whether the employer was justified in its decision not to appoint Lefa.arrow_forwardSue is a fifty-five year old employee of company A. Her children are out of college and her parents have both died. Company A offers a child care program to all employees along with an elder care program. However, Sue, like many other employees, has no need for these services, neither now or in the future. Should the firm retain these programs? Should alternative benefits for employees who have no use for such services be offered?arrow_forward
- Tyrone, a U.S. citizen, works for U.S. Oil at its production plant in Iraq. Tyrone has been with U.S. Oil for fifteen years and has always received excellent evaluations. Tyrone applies for a promotion with U.S. Oil to a supervisory role but is not hired for the position. The person hired for the position has been with the company for only two years and is much younger than Tyrone, who is forty-five. Can Tyrone sue U.S. Oil under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, even though he is not working within the United States? a)Yes, Tyrone can, because employees working abroad for U.S. employers are protected under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. b) No, Tyrone can’t, because any lawsuit brought by Tyrone would have to be under Iraqi law. c) No, Tyrone can’t, because employees working abroad for U.S. employers are not protected under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.arrow_forwardDrew is an officer of Energy Fuel, Inc. Drew knows that an Energy engineer recently developed a new, inexpensive method for converting hydrogen into fuel. Drew takes advantage of this information to buy Energy stock from Gert and, after the discovery is announced, to sell the stock to Holly at a profit. Gert claims that this is a violation of federal law. Is Gert correct? If so, what federal law has Drew violated, and what are its possible penalties?arrow_forwardAfter meeting with a supervisee, the supervisor believes that one of the supervisee’s clients is in danger of harming herself. The supervisee disagrees, he believes that the client is not at risk and decides not to take any action, despite requests by the supervisor. The supervisor decides to contact the client herself and makes arrangements to have her committed to a psychiatric unit. Has the supervisee acted ethically? Professionally? Has the supervisor acted ethically? Professionally?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education